Circulation
-
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation in children is not well studied; many of the current recommendations for advanced pediatric life support (APLS) are based on anecdotal experience rather than scientific study. The following are unique issues in APLS requiring a consensus decision: What are the best methods of vascular access and of drug delivery and dosages? What constitutes minimal paramedic training and equipment? There are also many shared controversies between APLS and ACLS, including the use of calcium, epinephrine vs isoproterenol, methoxamine, and bicarbonate. This article presents the scientific basis for these controversial issues and highlights areas where information is lacking. A discussion of these questions generated a consensus on some issues and hopefully will stimulate further study to answer the questions that were raised.
-
Current basic life support (BLS) protocols do not address the physiologic effects of accidental hypothermia in prehospital care. The extreme levels of bradycardia, bradypnea, and peripheral vasoconstriction that often accompany profound hypothermia may complicate the accurate diagnosis of cardiopulmonary arrest in the unmonitored patient. ⋯ This dilemma had led to disagreement among clinicians and researchers in hypothermia about prehospital care protocols for the severely hypothermic patient. This article reviews the controversy and recommends the application of a normal BLS protocol to hypothermic patients presenting in apparent cardiopulmonary arrest.
-
Blood flow during closed-chest CPR may result from variations in intrathoracic pressure rather than selective compression of the cardiac ventricles. During chest compression, the thoracic and abdominal cavities are subjected to positive pressure fluctuations. It has been suggested that compression of the abdomen may improve left heart outflow during CPR by limiting diaphragmatic movement or improving venous return. ⋯ Selective abdominal binding also increases systolic pressures during CPR but does not improve subdiaphragmatic venous return. Although abdominal binding may increase common carotid flow, it has not been shown to improve cerebral or myocardial perfusion when compared with conventional CPR alone. These CPR adjunct techniques have not been shown to improve outcome from cardiac arrest and should remain experimental until further well-designed studies addressing regional vital organ flow and outcome of resuscitation are performed.
-
The addition of interposed abdominal compressions (IACs) to otherwise standard CPR enhances artificial circulation both in anesthetized dogs with ventricular fibrillation and in electrical models of the circulation that demonstrate fundamental mechanisms generating flow. Manual abdominal compressions cause both central aortic and central venous pressure pulses but, because of differences in venous and arterial capacitance, the former are usually greater than the latter. ⋯ However, no study has demonstrated that IAC-CPR improves either short- or long-term survival after cardiac arrest in man. Accordingly, the method remains experimental and cannot be recommended for basic life support at the present time.
-
Comparative Study
Vest inflation without simultaneous ventilation during cardiac arrest in dogs: improved survival from prolonged cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Myocardial and cerebral blood flow can be generated during cardiac arrest by techniques that manipulate intrathoracic pressure. Augmentation of intrathoracic pressure by high-pressure ventilation simultaneous with compression of the chest in dogs has been shown to produce higher flows to the heart and brain, but has limited usefulness because of the requirement for endotracheal intubation and complex devices. A system was developed that can produce high intrathoracic pressure without simultaneous ventilation by use of a pneumatically cycled vest placed around the thorax (vest cardiopulmonary resuscitation [CPR]). ⋯ Vest CPR was compared with manual CPR with either conventional (300 newtons) or high (430 newtons) sternal force. After induction of ventricular fibrillation, each technique was performed for 26 min. Defibrillation was then performed.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)