Circulation
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical Trial
A randomized comparison of external and internal cardioversion of chronic atrial fibrillation.
Delivery of shocks within the right atrium has been reported to be more effective than conventional external shocks in converting atrial fibrillation (AF), but these two cardioversion techniques have never been compared prospectively. The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacies of external and internal cardioversion in patients with chronic AF unresponsive to prior attempts at electrical and/or pharmacological cardioversion. Low-dose amiodarone was used in all patients after cardioversion to suppress recurrences of AF. ⋯ Internal cardioversion is more effective than external cardioversion in restoring sinus rhythm and is as safe as external cardioversion in patients with chronic AF. The recurrence rate of AF is the same after both types of cardioversion. If conventional electrical cardioversion is ineffective, internal cardioversion should be attempted. The combination of low-dose amiodarone and external or internal cardioversion may result in maintaining sinus rhythm long-term in patients with refractory AF.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Alternative techniques of cardioplegia.
Although normothermic cardioplegia has been used with acceptable clinical results, no studies have previously been performed to determine the metabolic consequences of these various techniques of myocardial protection. Therefore, we have performed a randomized clinical trial to assess the effects of three cardioplegic techniques on myocardial metabolic recovery. ⋯ Intermittent cold cardioplegia inhibited mitochondrial function but prevented the degradation of adenine nucleotides. Warm antegrade cardioplegia had the greatest myocardial oxygen consumption, and warm retrograde cardioplegia had the greatest anaerobic lactate production. There were no differences in clinical outcomes between cardioplegic groups.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Clinical Trial
Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of intravenous diltiazem in patients with atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter.
Diltiazem, a calcium channel blocker, has been shown to be safe and effective in the treatment of patients in atrial fibrillation and/or atrial flutter. However, there have been no pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies of diltiazem in these patients. ⋯ First, the pharmacokinetics of diltiazem in patients with atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter is nonlinear with an apparent dose-dependent decrease in systemic clearance with increasing infusion rate. Second, using a sigmoidal Emax model, there is a strong relation between plasma diltiazem concentration and percent heart rate reduction. Third, the plasma concentrations of the principal metabolites desacetyldiltiazem and N-desmethyldiltiazem are low and are not expected to contribute significantly to the pharmacodynamics of intravenous diltiazem in these patients.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Aprotinin prevents cardiopulmonary bypass-induced platelet dysfunction. A scanning electron microscope study.
Administration of aprotinin during extracorporeal circulation reduces blood loss and improves platelet function. ⋯ By preserving platelet function, aprotinin improves postoperative hemostasis in all patients who receive high dose and in most who receive low dose.