Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene
-
J Occup Environ Hyg · Nov 2006
Comparative StudyPowered, air-purifying particulate respirator filter penetration by a DOP aerosol.
In 1995, new certification requirements for all nonpowered, air-purifying particulate filter respirators were put in place when 42 CFR 84 replaced 30 CFR 11. However, the certification requirements for all other classes of respirators, including powered air-purifying respirators (PAPRs), were transferred to 42 CFR 84 from 30 CFR 11 without major changes. Since the inception of 42 CFR 84, researchers have learned that the efficiency of electrostatic filter media, in contrast with mechanical filter media, can be rapidly degraded by oil aerosols. ⋯ While laboratory tests show that the filtration efficiency of this electrostatic PAPR filter degrades with exposure to DOP aerosol, the observed laboratory degradation may or may not affect workplace performance, as similar degradation has not been verified in workplace studies. Based on these laboratory results, a proposed method for evaluating high-efficiency PAPR filters is presented. This proposed method would ensure that high-efficiency PAPR filters (> or = 99.97% efficient and magenta in color) meet critical performance criteria when loaded.
-
J Occup Environ Hyg · Nov 2006
Comparative StudyA comparison of total, respirable, and real-time airborne particulate sampling in horse barns.
Measurements of total, respirable, and real-time airborne particulate were obtained in 12 horse barns in summer and winter. Respirable and total particulate concentrations were measured gravimetrically; real-time particulate was measured with an aerosol photometer. Total particulate (TP) ranged from nondetectable (ND) to 2.1 mg/m3 and from ND to 1.2 mg/m3 for winter and summer sampling, respectively. ⋯ The mean respirable fraction of particulate for summer and winter measurements was 0.63 and 0.34, respectively Real-time particulate (RTP) concentration was significantly correlated with TP for winter measurements and for pooled data but was not significantly correlated with RP for winter, summer, or pooled measurements. Peak, 10-sec average levels of RTP were estimated to range up to 22 mg/m3 in the samples collected. The data suggest that (a) airborne particulate concentrations and particle size distributions vary considerably among horse barns, and (b) real-time sampling, with an aerosol photometer, may be a more reliable measure of airborne TP than airborne RP in these environments.
-
J Occup Environ Hyg · Nov 2006
Comparative StudyIntegrated unit performance testing of powered, air-purifying particulate respirators using a DOP challenge aerosol.
Although workplace protection factor (WPF) and simulated workplace protection factor (SWPF) studies provide useful information regarding the performance capabilities of powered air-purifying respirators (PAPRs) under certain workplace or simulated workplace conditions, some fail to address the issue of total PAPR unit performance over extended time. PAPR unit performance over time is of paramount importance in protecting worker health over the course of a work shift or at least for the recommended service lifetime of the PAPR battery pack, whichever is shorter. The need for PAPR unit performance testing has become even more important with the inception of 42 CFR 84 and the recent introduction of electrostatic respirator filter media into the PAPR market. ⋯ The two loose-fitting helmet PAPRs indicate that unit performance testing without the breathing machine is a more stringent test than testing with the breathing machine under the conditions used. The PAPR with a loose-fitting hood gave inconclusive results as to which testing condition is more stringent. The PAPR unit equipped with electrostatic filters gave the highest maximum penetration values during unit performance testing.