Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR
-
Comparative Study
Comparison of two methods for ranking applicants for residency.
Ranking radiology residency applicants is a complex process. Multiple factors, such as the variability in evaluation of candidates and the sometimes excessive subjectivity experienced, may influence the final outcome. To address inconsistencies, Yale University's selection committee integrated a mathematical model of ranking. ⋯ In some but not all cases, the discrepancies were remedied. Reasons for discrepancies are discussed. The mathematical method used in parallel with the subjective method has proved useful in identifying misplaced applicants and provided assurance that the final rank list reflects the committee's evaluation of each applicant.
-
The aim of this study was to assess 15-year trends in nonprocedural clinical evaluation and management (E&M) services provided by interventional radiologists (IRs). ⋯ Interventional radiologist claims for nonprocedural clinical encounters with Medicare fee-for-service beneficiaries increased 12-fold over the 15 years from 1993 to 2008, as payment denial rates dropped by half. Evaluation and management services by IRs have grown fastest in the private office setting, which now represents the single most common location of these services.