Vascular
-
Comparative Study
Comparison of supra-arch in situ fenestration and chimney techniques for aortic dissection involving the left subclavian artery.
Endovascular intervention involving the aortic arch, particularly in thoracic aortic dissection, remains challenging and controversial at current time when there is no commercially suitable grafts on most of the international markets. This study compared two endovascular treatments that maintain left subclavian artery perfusion using two modified techniques for type-B aortic dissection patients. ⋯ Although there were previous studies describing the similar techniques, this study appears to be the first study to compare in situ fenestration and chimney techniques for aortic dissection involving the left subclavian artery according to the MEDLINE search. Although we are unable to establish the superiority between two approaches due to small sample size and relative short period of follow-up, in situ fenestration may represent a more favorable option, especially among aortic dissections with short proximal landing zones in the study.
-
Thoracic endovascular aortic repair has become a preferred treatment strategy for thoracic aortic aneurysms and dissections. Yet, it is not well understood if the performance of endografts is affected by physiologic strain due to cyclic aortic motion during cardiac pulsation and respiration. We aim to quantify cardiac- and respiratory-induced changes of the postthoracic endovascular aortic repair thoracic aorta and endograft geometries. ⋯ Deformations are present across the thoracic aorta due to cardiopulmonary influences after thoracic endovascular aortic repair. The geometric deformations are greatest in the ascending aorta and decline at the stented thoracic aorta. Additional investigation is warranted to correlate aortic deformation to endograft performance.