Heart rhythm : the official journal of the Heart Rhythm Society
-
Multicenter Study
Rate control and clinical outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation and obstructive lung disease.
Rate-control medications are considered first-line treatment for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). However, obstructive lung disease (OLD), a condition prevalent in those with AF, often makes it difficult to use those medications because of the lack of studies on new-onset AF in patients with OLD. ⋯ Among patients with AF-OLD, rate-control treatment using selective and nonselective BB was associated with a significant reduction in mortality compared with CCB use. Further prospective randomized trials are required to confirm these findings.
-
Second-generation cryoballoon (CB2)-based pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) has demonstrated encouraging clinical results for the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) and persistent AF. However, rhythm follow-up after PVI is mainly based on Holter electrocardiography of limited duration. ⋯ CB2-PVI seems safe and feasible in patients with an implanted cardiac device. A significantly higher AF/AT burden was seen in patients with an implanted cardiac device compared to a control group.
-
The role of cryoballoon ablation (CBA) for antral pulmonary vein isolation (APVI) has not been well established in persistent atrial fibrillation (PerAF). Isolation of the left atrial posterior wall (BOX) after APVI has been suggested to improve the efficacy of radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFA) in PerAF. ⋯ In PerAF, an initial approach of APVI by CBA or APVI + BOX by CF-RFA has a similar efficacy of 40%-50% without AADs. After repeat ablation for APVI + BOX by CF-RFA in ∼25%, sinus rhythm is maintained in 60%-70% of patients without AADs.
-
Functional mitral regurgitation (FMR) and atrial fibrillation (AF) are frequent heart failure (HF) complications. Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) can improve FMR; however, little is known about the influence of AF on FMR improvement. ⋯ FMR improvement is more common in CRT recipients in SR vs AF, despite a similar degree of LV remodeling. LA volume and MA diameter are greater in the AF group, causing the negative impact of AF on FMR improvement in CRT, as well as indicating a potential therapeutic target (ie, AF rhythm control).