JBI evidence synthesis
-
JBI evidence synthesis · Jan 2020
Experiences of transition to motherhood among pregnant women following assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review protocol of qualitative evidence.
This systematic review aims to identify and synthesize available qualitative evidence related to the experiences of transition to motherhood during pregnancy in women who conceived through assisted reproductive technology (ART). ⋯ This review will follow the JBI approach for qualitative systematic reviews. Databases that will be searched for published and unpublished studies include MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, ProQuest Health & Medical Collection, Google Scholar and Open Access Theses and Dissertations (in English), and Ichushi-Web, CiNii and the Institutional Repositories Database (in Japanese). Titles and abstracts will be screened by two independent reviewers in full. The full-text of selected studies will be assessed in detail, and findings and their illustrations will be extracted and aggregated. Any disagreements between the reviewers that arise at each stage will be resolved through discussion, or by a third reviewer.
-
JBI evidence synthesis · Jan 2020
Effectiveness of the Manchester Triage System on time to treatment in the emergency department: a systematic review.
The objective of this review was to synthesize the best available evidence on the effectiveness of the Manchester Triage System (MTS) on time to treatment (TtT) for patients who visit the emergency department (ED). ⋯ The MTS reduced the median TtT for patients triaged at the highest priority levels (orange and yellow), but it did not decrease the median TtT in all patients. The existing evidence base regarding the effectiveness of the MTS comes from two studies with methodological limitations that could not be pooled. The evidence indicates the MTS may confer benefit to some patients who visit the ED by reducing TtT, but not for all patients. Further research is needed before firm conclusions can be made.
-
JBI evidence synthesis · Jan 2020
Enhancing the verbal handover process for nurses in inpatient orthopedic wards: a best practice implementation project.
This evidence-based quality improvement project aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of a handover guide in improving handovers from registered nurses to enrolled nurses. ⋯ The project has successfully improved nurses' clinical handovers and contributed to safe patient care. Further audits are required to sustain the evidence-based practice change. Nursing leaders play a significant role in supporting the project and building a positive evidence-based practice environment.
-
JBI evidence synthesis · Jan 2020
Retention of doctors in emergency medicine: a scoping review protocol.
The primary question of the review is: What is known about retention of doctors in emergency medicine? ⋯ We will search medical literature databases including MEDLINE, Embase, HMIC, PsycINFO, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and the British Medical Journal collection. We will supplement this by searching business and management journals including Business Source Complete, ProQuest Business Database and Emerald Business and Management Journals. A structured iterative search of the gray literature will be conducted. Retrieved papers will be screened for inclusion by two reviewers. Data will be extracted and presented in tabular form and a narrative summary that align with the review's objective.
-
JBI evidence synthesis · Jan 2020
Use of huddles among frontline staff in clinical settings: a scoping review protocol.
This scoping review aims to provide an overview of the current evidence on huddles in healthcare settings involving frontline staff. ⋯ An initial limited search of PubMed and CINAHL Plus with Full Text will be performed, followed by analysis of the title, abstract and MeSH used to describe the article. Second, searches of PubMed, EBSCOhost and ProQuest will be conducted, followed by searches in reference lists of all articles that meet the inclusion criteria. Studies published in English from inception to the present will be considered. Retrieved papers will be screened for inclusion by at least two reviewers. Data will be extracted and presented in tabular form and a narrative summary that align with the review's objective.