The Journal of bone and joint surgery. American volume
-
J Bone Joint Surg Am · Feb 2011
How much varus is optimal with proximal femoral osteotomy to preserve the femoral head in Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease?
Although proximal femoral varus osteotomy is an established operative treatment for Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease, there is a lack of data on how much varus at the osteotomy is optimal for preserving the spherical shape of the femoral head. The purpose of this study was to determine if there is a correlation between the amount of varus used and the Stulberg radiographic outcome at maturity and to determine if the varus angulation improved over time. ⋯ Contrary to the conventional belief, greater varus angulation does not necessarily produce better preservation of the femoral head following proximal femoral varus osteotomy. Given the results, our recommendation is to achieve 10° to 15° of varus correction when performing proximal femoral varus osteotomy on hips that are in the early stages of Legg-Calvé-Perthes disease.
-
This update summarizes recent research pertaining to the subspecialty of orthopaedic foot and ankle surgery that was published or presented between August 2009 and July 2010. The sources of these studies include The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery (American and British Volumes), Foot & Ankle International, and the proceedings of Specialty Day at the annual meeting of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons (AAOS), held on March 13, 2010, in New Orleans, Louisiana, and the summer meeting of the American Orthopaedic Foot & Ankle Society (AOFAS), held on July 7 through 10, 2010, in National Harbor, Maryland.
-
J Bone Joint Surg Am · Feb 2011
Comparative StudyVolar locking plate implant prominence and flexor tendon rupture.
Flexor tendon injury is a recognized complication of volar plate fixation of distal radial fractures. A suspected contributing factor is implant prominence at the watershed line, where the flexor tendons lie closest to the plate. ⋯ Flexor tendon rupture after volar plating of the distal part of the radius is an infrequent but serious complication. The plate used in Group 1 is prominent at the watershed line of the distal part of the radius, which may increase the risk of tendon injury. We found no ruptures in Group 2, perhaps as a result of the lower profile of the plate. Further studies are needed before recommending one plate over another. Regardless of plate selection, surgeons should avoid implant prominence in this area.
-
J Bone Joint Surg Am · Feb 2011
Comparative StudyComparison of three different pelvic circumferential compression devices: a biomechanical cadaver study.
Pelvic circumferential compression devices are designed to stabilize the pelvic ring and reduce the volume of the pelvis following trauma. It is uncertain whether pelvic circumferential compression devices can be safely applied for all types of pelvic fractures because the effects of the devices on the reduction of fracture fragments are unknown. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of circumferential compression devices on the dynamic realignment and final reduction of the pelvic fractures as a measure of the quality of reduction. ⋯ The Pelvic Binder, SAM Sling, and T-POD provided sufficient reduction in partially stable and unstable (Tile type-B1 and C) pelvic fractures. No undesirable overreduction was noted. The pulling force that was needed to attain complete reduction of the fracture parts varied significantly among the three devices, with the T-POD requiring the lowest pulling force for fracture reduction.