International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature
-
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc · Apr 2021
ReviewSystematic review and meta-analysis: SGLT2 inhibitors, blood pressure and cardiovascular outcomes.
Clinical trials suggest that SGLT2 inhibitors reduce the risk of cardiovascular mortality in patients with type 2 diabetes, however the mechanism is unclear. Our objective was to test the hypothesis that blood pressure reduction is one potential mechanism underlying the observed improvements in cardiovascular outcomes with SGLT2 inhibitors. ⋯ Cardiovascular events are reduced in participants with type 2 diabetes treated with SGLT2 inhibitors compared with placebo. There was no significant relationship between the risk of developing adverse cardiovascular events and blood pressure reduction with SGLT2 inhibitors. There is insufficient evidence to suggest that blood pressure reduction is a significant contributor to the cardiovascular benefits observed.
-
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc · Apr 2021
Coronary lipid-rich plaque characteristics in Japanese patients with acute coronary syndrome and stable angina: A near infrared spectroscopy and intravascular ultrasound study.
Asians have a much lower incidence of adverse coronary events than Caucasians. We sought to evaluate the characteristics of coronary lipid-rich plaques (LRP) in Asian patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) and stable angina (SA). We also aimed to identify surrogate markers for the extent of LRP. ⋯ We confirmed that NIRS-IVUS plaque assessment could be useful to differentiate ACS from SA culprit lesions, and that a threshold maxLCBI4mm ≥ 400 was clinically suitable in Japanese patients. No surrogate maker for a high-risk LRP was found; consequently, direct intravascular evaluation of plaque characteristics remains important.
-
Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc · Apr 2021
Accuracy of OMI ECG findings versus STEMI criteria for diagnosis of acute coronary occlusion myocardial infarction.
In the STEMI paradigm of Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI), many NSTEMI patients have unrecognized acute coronary occlusion MI (OMI), may not receive emergent reperfusion, and have higher mortality than NSTEMI patients without occlusion. We have proposed a new OMI vs. Non-Occlusion MI (NOMI) paradigm shift. We sought to compare the diagnostic accuracy of OMI ECG findings vs. formal STEMI criteria for the diagnosis of OMI. We hypothesized that blinded interpretation for predefined OMI ECG findings would be more accurate than STEMI criteria for the diagnosis of OMI. ⋯ Blinded interpretation using predefined OMI ECG findings was superior to STEMI criteria for the ECG diagnosis of Occlusion MI. These data support further investigation into the OMI vs. NOMI paradigm and suggest that STEMI(-) OMI patients could be identified rapidly and noninvasively for emergent reperfusion using more accurate ECG interpretation.