International journal of surgery
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Pain after surgery: can protective analgesia reduce pain? A randomised clinical trial.
To improve the patients postoperative pain experience using protective analgesia for patients undergoing third molar surgery under day case general anaesthesia. ⋯ There was no difference in the protective analgesia group compared with conventional analgesia group in improving postoperative pain experience. A different protective analgesia regime may be necessary, which employs a more aggressive and multimodal strategy for postoperative pain management.
-
Comparative Study
Incisional hernia rates following laparoscopic colorectal resection.
In published series with satisfactory follow-up incisional hernia rates following laparotomy vary between 4 and 18%, with up to 75% developing within two years of operation. This therefore represents the commonest complication following open abdominal surgery and a substantial added workload for the colorectal/general surgeon. ⋯ The well-documented advantages of laparoscopic surgery include reduced hospital stay, early return to activity, decreased analgesic requirements and improved cosmesis. However, the results of this study suggest that incisional hernia rates are not decreased by laparoscopic surgery, although the hernias may be smaller and more amenable to repair by laparoscopic approaches.
-
Mortality and morbidity in trauma remain a major problem in developing countries. Organized emergency response systems for transfer of trauma patients to hospitals are absent and the consequent delays could cause significant complications. ⋯ Transfer and delay in admission to a tertiary care center does not affect in-hospital mortality of trauma patients in a setting with no emergency response system. This may be due to self selection of patients who survive long enough to reach the hospital.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
Prophylactic antibiotics in open mesh repair of inguinal hernia - a randomized controlled trial.
The role of prophylactic antibiotics in mesh repair of inguinal hernia is unclear. A Cochrane meta-analysis in 2005 concluded that "antibiotic prophylaxis for elective inguinal hernia repair cannot be firmly recommended or discarded" and "further studies are needed, particularly on the use for mesh repair." So, we designed a study to define the role of prophylactic antibiotics in mesh repair of inguinal hernia. We conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blind, trial comparing wound infection rates in 450 patients (225 received intravenous Cefazolin, 225 received a placebo) undergoing primary inguinal hernia repair electively using polypropylene mesh. 334 patients who completed a followup period of one month were analyzed. ⋯ Most of the infections occurred between the 7th and 12th post-operative day after discharge from the hospital. Antibiotic prophylaxis was associated with decreased incidence of wound infection when compared to control group, but the difference was not statistically significant. Based on our results we do not recommend the routine use of antibiotic prophylaxis in elective mesh repair of inguinal hernias.
-
Peri-operative monitoring technology has made great strides in the last 20 years with the introduction of minimally invasive devices to measure inter alia stroke volume, cardiac output, depth of anaesthesia and cerebral and tissue oxygen monitoring. Despite these technological advances, peri-operative management of the high risk major surgery patient has remained virtually unchanged. The vast majority of patients undergo a pre-operative assessment which is neither designed to quantify functional capacity nor predict outcome. ⋯ It is perhaps not surprising that outcome still remains poor in high-risk patients.(1) In this review, we will briefly describe the role of peri-operative optimization, some of the available monitors and indicate how their combined use might be beneficial in managing the high-risk surgical patient. We believe that although there is now evidence to suggest that the use of individual new monitors (such as assessment of fluid status, depth of anaesthesia, tissue oxygenation and blood flow) can influence outcome, it will only be their combination that will radically improve the peri-operative management and outcome of high-risk surgical patients. It is a matter of some urgency that large scale, prospective and collaborative studies be designed, funded and executed to prove or disprove this hypothesis.