International journal of surgery
-
Comparative Study
Emergency laparoscopic cholecystectomy in an unselected cohort: a safe and viable option in a specialist centre.
Patients presenting acutely with symptomatic gallstone-related disease have historically had their laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) deferred due to perceived increased operative risks in the acute setting, particularly conversion to open surgery. The aim of this study was to compare morbidity and mortality between unselected cohorts of patients undergoing elective and 'emergency' LC in a District General Hospital. ⋯ When performed by specialist laparoscopic surgeons, LC in the acute setting is safe with mortality and morbidity rates, including conversion to open surgery, comparable to elective LC.
-
Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathways has been shown to minimize the duration of hospital stay. The aim of this study was to identify which factors have the greatest impact at reducing the length of stay within an enhanced recovery programme. ⋯ Lower ASA grade, use of epidurals and avoidance of regular oral opiates are associated with an earlier discharge in an ERAS programme.
-
Caring for patients in traditionally designed, large teaching hospitals is often frustrating. Attempts at decreasing internal costs and inpatient length of stay are universally undertaken in order to address dwindling reimbursement, and patient care becomes more specialized and fractionated. These attempts have proven to be myopic, at best, and injurious to patient care and professional job satisfaction, at worst. This manuscript attempts to characterize the operational processes of our university operating room facility as well as make suggestions for operational improvements that can be applied to all hospitals. ⋯ Nowhere in the hospital is this drive for cost containment and increased patient volume more evident than in the operating theatre. Long-term improvements must embrace radical reduction of OR costs and increased operative patient through-put, (i.e. per 8 h day; per fiscal year) by re-engineering the processes of operative patient care. In the end, the ultimate goal of safe and high-quality patient care must not be compromised.
-
As with any technology-driven field, laparoscopic surgery has made tremendous progress in recent years. Since the performance of first laparoscopic cholecystectomy by Prof Dr Med Erich Mühe of Böblingen, Germany 1985, this procedure has overtaken open cholecystectomy as the treatment of choice in cholelithiasis. However due to the cost incurred thereof and surgical training needed, open cholecystectomy is still performed on a very large scale in most parts of the third world countries. We tried to modify the conventional cholecystectomy to a minimal access approach (with minimal required infrastructure) to suit majority of patients with cholelithiasis in lieu of cost and morbidity. ⋯ These results confirm that mini-lap cholecystectomy by our modified approach is safe, feasible and has lesser morbidity and postoperative pain as compared to conventional open cholecystectomy. The technique is cost effective, easy to practice and can benefit majority of patients who otherwise cannot afford the laparoscopic surgery. Hence it can serve as an alternative to the gold standard laparoscopic cholecystectomy with almost comparable results.