International journal of surgery
-
Clinical handover (handoff, sign out) is frequently implicated as a cause of adverse events in hospitalised patients. Complex social interactions such as handover are subject to the teamwork skills of the participants and there is increasing evidence that the quality of teamwork in handover affects outcome. Teamwork skills have been assessed in one-to-one handovers but the applicability of these measurement tools to healthcare team shift handovers remains unproven. This study aimed to assess the feasibility of measurement of teamwork skills in shift handover and the applicability of adapted teamwork skills rating scales to a shift handover environment. ⋯ Teamwork skills vary widely between handovers and can be consistently scored using both rating scales. It is feasible to use adapted teamwork skill rating scales in shift handover and they appear to measure different constructs to traditional handover measures such as interruptions and communication checklist completion. The assessment of teamwork skills is a necessary complement to the assessment of completeness of information transfer when evaluating the overall quality of handover.
-
A best evidence topic in neurosurgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was: In patients undergoing craniostomy for the evacuation of chronic subdural haematoma, does the use of two burr-holes compared to one burr-hole improve clinical outcomes? A total of 238 papers were identified using the reported search protocol. Four of these articles represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. ⋯ Two studies demonstrated shorter hospital stay with two burr-hole craniostomy. Furthermore, one study showed increased rates of wound infection with one burr-hole craniostomy. Therefore, the clinical bottom line is that performing either two burr-hole craniostomy or one burr-hole craniostomy does not provide specific differences in patient outcome improvement following surgery for chronic subdural haematoma, however further research is required owing to the flawed methodology of existing studies.
-
Recent studies show a significant rate of adverse events in hospitalized patients in developing/transitional countries--with approximately 18% of them related to surgical procedures. Understanding and preventing these errors requires adequate training in patient safety research methods--however, relevant training programs are currently lacking. We developed, delivered and evaluated a training program to address this gap. ⋯ We have developed a viable, WHO-driven training program that can be delivered to clinical and non-clinical researchers to develop their competencies and thereby build capacity in developing/transitional countries to carry out surgical safety research. All program materials are available in English and Spanish for research, training and dissemination.
-
C-reactive protein (CRP) has been used as an indicator of postoperative complications in abdominal surgery. Its short half-life makes it a reliable marker of the systemic inflammatory response secondary to a surgical procedure or to the appearance of complications, rapidly returning to normal values with the recovery of the patient. ⋯ According to these results, an early and persistent elevation of CRP after colorectal surgery with anastomosis, is a marker of anastomotic leakage. A cut-off value > 140 mg/L on POD3 maximizes sensitivity and specificity.
-
Weight loss is the most commonly used metric in comparing outcomes after bariatric surgery. This is frequently presented in the form of percentage of excess weight loss (%EWL). Patients' weight is measured at several time points prior to surgery. The time point selected as the preoperative weight can have significant effects upon the measurement of %EWL. This study aimed to investigate whether there was any standardization in the selection of preoperative weight amongst UK bariatric surgery healthcare professionals. ⋯ Variation in the measurement of the preoperative weight will lead to variations of calculated %EWL between different bariatric units or even between different disciplines in the same unit. This will make comparison of published outcome data difficult. This study highlights the urgent need for standardization.