International journal of surgery
-
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the leading causes of cancer death all over the world and right-sided colon cancer represents approximately 15% of all cases of CRC. Laparoscopic colectomies produce advantages in short-term outcome compared to open procedures and have recently benefited by a long term oncologic validation. This study was designed to compare the short- and medium-term surgical outcomes of totally laparoscopic (TLRC) and laparoscopic-assisted right colectomy (LARC) for neoplasia, hypothesizing they may be at least similar. ⋯ Although more appropriate indications must be set by future studies, we encourage the choice of a TLRC for the treatment of cancer of the right colon. TLRC is actually a feasible and safe technique, which has resulted in an encouraging short-term outcome, low incidence of major complications and preservation of oncologic principles, without affecting operative times.
-
A best evidence topic in neurosurgery was written according to a structured protocol. The question addressed was: In patients undergoing craniostomy for the evacuation of chronic subdural haematoma, does the use of two burr-holes compared to one burr-hole improve clinical outcomes? A total of 238 papers were identified using the reported search protocol. Four of these articles represented the best evidence to answer the clinical question. ⋯ Two studies demonstrated shorter hospital stay with two burr-hole craniostomy. Furthermore, one study showed increased rates of wound infection with one burr-hole craniostomy. Therefore, the clinical bottom line is that performing either two burr-hole craniostomy or one burr-hole craniostomy does not provide specific differences in patient outcome improvement following surgery for chronic subdural haematoma, however further research is required owing to the flawed methodology of existing studies.
-
Comparative Study
Accuracy of clinical coding from 1210 appendicectomies in a British district general hospital.
The primary aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of clinical coding in identifying negative appendicectomies. The secondary aim was to analyse trends over time in rates of simple, complex (gangrenous or perforated) and negative appendicectomies. ⋯ Clinical coding for negative appendicectomy was unreliable. Negative rates may be higher than suspected. This has implications for the validity of national database analyses. Using this form of data as a quality indictor for appendicitis should be reconsidered until its quality is improved.
-
Comparative Study
Neutrophil lymphocyte ratio in outcome prediction after emergency abdominal surgery in the elderly.
Accurate prediction of outcome after emergency surgery in elderly patients may assist decision-making. Many scoring systems require post-operative data (e.g. P-POSSUM) whilst others have failed to gain widespread use. Recent reports suggest that C-reactive protein (CRP) and the neutrophil lymphocyte (N/L ratio) ratio may predict surgical outcome. ⋯ N/L ratio is an easily calculable pre-operative measure that may have utility in the prediction of outcome after emergency abdominal surgery in the elderly. Further work to validate this measure in a larger, prospective setting and determine the underlying mechanisms that mediate outcome are necessary.
-
The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive accuracy of Lintula score in Turkish appendicitis patients. ⋯ Lintula score seems to be useful method to diagnose acute appendicitis among Turkish patients and may reduce the rate of negative appendectomy.