International journal of surgery
-
A baseline assessment of surgical capacity is recommended as a first-step to surgical system strengthening in order to inform national policy. In Ethiopia, the World Health Organization's Tool for Situational Analysis (WHO SAT) was adapted to assess surgical, obstetric, and anesthesia capacity as part of a national initiative: Saving Lives Through Safe Surgery (SaLTS). This study describes the process of adapting this tool and initial results. ⋯ While the modified SaLTS Tool provided evaluation against Ethiopian national benchmarks, the resultant assessment was much lengthier than standard international tools. Analysis of results using the SARA framework allowed for comparison to global standards and provided insight into essential parts of the tool. An assessment tool for national surgical policy should maintain internationally comparable metrics and incorporation into existing surveys when possible, while including country-specific targets.
-
Review Meta Analysis
Effects of erector spinae plane block on postoperative pain and side-effects in adult patients underwent surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Recently, the effects of erector spinae plane block on postoperative pain have become increasingly controversial. This meta-analysis compared the effects of ESP block versus placebo on postoperative analgesia and side effects to determine whether the new technique is a reliable alternative for pain management. ⋯ ESP block as a novel technique exhibited superior postoperative analgesic effects, reducing the postoperative complications in spinal, thoracic, and abdominal surgeries during the early postoperative period. However, as a new nerve block technique, numerous large-sized RCTs are needed for further research.
-
Review
Orthopaedic surgery after COVID-19 - A blueprint for resuming elective surgery after a pandemic.
The COVID-19 outbreak was fraught with danger and despair as many medically necessary surgeries were cancelled to preserve precious healthcare resources and mitigate disease transmission. As the rate of infection starts to slow, healthcare facilities and economies attempt to return to normalcy in a graduated manner and the massive pent-up demand for surgeries needs to eventually be addressed in a systematic and equitable manner. ⋯ The world was ill prepared for the initial COVID-19 outbreak. However, with effective forward planning, institutions can ramp-up elective surgical caseload in a safe and equitable manner.
-
Comparative Study
Laparoscopic VS. Open splenectomy and oesophagogastric devascularisation for liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension: A retrospective cohort study.
We compared laparoscopic splenectomy combined with oesophagogastric devascularisation vs. open splenectomy combined with oesophagogastric devascularisation in patients with portal hypertension secondary to liver cirrhosis. ⋯ Laparoscopic splenectomy combined with oesophagogastric devascularisation is technically feasible and safe in selected patients. Compared with the open group, the laparoscopic group showed a less volume of blood loss, shorter length of hospitalisation, and fewer postoperative complications but similar long-term outcomes.
-
After the emergence of Covid-19 in China, Hubei Province, the epidemic quickly spread to Europe. France was quickly hit and our institution was one of the first French university to receive patients infected with Sars-COV2. The predicted massive influx of patients motivated the cancellation of all elective surgical procedures planned to free hospitalization beds and to free intensive care beds. Nevertheless, we should properly select patients who will be canceled to avoid life-threatening. The retained surgical indications are surgical emergencies, oncologic surgery, and organ transplantation. ⋯ We found that the performance of oncological or emergency surgery is possible, safe for both patients and caregivers.