International journal of surgery
-
Conventional treatment for hemorrhagic shock includes the infusion of intravenous (IV) fluid and blood products in order to restore intravascular volume. However, even after normal heart rate and blood pressure are restored, the visceral organs often remain ischemic. This leads to organ dysfunction and also releases numerous cytokines and inflammatory mediators which activate the body's inflammatory response. ⋯ Subsequent human studies have shown that DPR after damage control surgery for hemorrhage or sepsis leads to faster abdominal closure, higher rate of primary fascial closure, and reduced abdominal complications. Peritoneal resuscitation has also shown benefits in the resuscitation after acute brain death, including reduced inflammatory mediators and organ edema. Use of DPR in potential organ donors leads to an increase in the number of organs procured per donor, most frequently by increasing the number of lungs procured.
-
The appropriate resuscitation of patients in hemorrhagic shock is critical to improving survival. Current strategies for massive transfusions utilize fixed ratio protocols to rapidly deliver plasma and platelets to the patient. ⋯ Efforts are ongoing to provide patient-specific transfusion therapy in order to avoid excess transfusions. Thromboelastography (TEG) or Rotational Thromboelastometry (ROTEM) are two viscoelastic analyzers capable of providing Viscoelastic testing.
-
Significant pelvic ring fractures are usually secondary to high-energy trauma, and when associated with other life-threatening injuries and hemodynamic instability, result in high mortality rates ranging from 40 to 60%. The major cause of death during the first 24 h after pelvic trauma is attributed to acute blood loss, with later mortality secondary to multisystem organ failure. In a majority of patients, the source of pelvic bleeding is from disruption of the presacral venous plexus and bony fracture sites, while arterial injury is present in only 10-15%. ⋯ The principles of care center on resuscitation, external stabilization of the pelvis, and hemorrhage control with angiography and embolization (AE) and/or preperitoneal pelvic packing (PPP). AE is effective in controlling arterial bleeding and its role in the management of hemodynamically unstable patients with pelvic fractures is supported by the EAST guidelines. However, since most patients suffer from venous bleeding, PPP can be an alternate life saving technique to control hemorrhage, especially if AE is not immediately available.
-
Major trauma is a leading cause of death, particularly amongst young patients. Conventional therapies for post-traumatic cardiovascular shock and acute pulmonary failure may sometimes be insufficient and even dangerous. New approaches to trauma care and novel salvage techniques are necessary to improve outcomes. ⋯ Moreover, we have identified several pre-ECLS patient characteristics useful in predicting ECLS treatment appropriateness in severe poly-traumatized patients. These might be helpful in deciding whether the ECLS should be initiated in patients who are severely complex and compromised. Future improvements in materials and techniques are expected to make ECLS even easier and safer to manage, leading to a further extension of its use in severely injured patients.
-
Review Meta Analysis Comparative Study
Percutaneous compression plate versus dynamic hip screw for treatment of intertrochanteric hip fractures: A overview of systematic reviews and update meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
Intertrochanteric hip fractures lead to high morbidity and mortality rates. As a minimally invasive technique, many studies reported the efficacy of PCCP for the treatment of intertrochanteric fractures, but the controversy still existed in some outcomes. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of PCCP and DHS by a overview of systematic reviews and well-designed, comprehensive update meta-analysis. ⋯ PCCP is recommended to treat intertrochanteric hip fractures as an alternative minimally invasive method. More high-quality, randomized controlled trials that are adequately powered are needed to further evaluate the efficacy of PCCP and DHS.