Acta orthopaedica
-
Background and purpose - Preoperative posterior tilt of the femoral head as seen on lateral radiographs has been reported to affect the risk of fixation failure in cases of minimally displaced femoral neck fractures (Garden I-II). We investigated radiological risk factors of treatment failure. Patients and methods - We included 417 patients (68% women, median age: 78 years (50-108) with a minimally displaced femoral neck fracture (Garden I-II) treated with internal fixation in a retrospective cohort study. ⋯ A failure occurred in 13 of the 65 patients with a posterior tilt of at least 20° and in 5 of the 9 patients with an anterior tilt greater than 10°. Interpretation - A preoperative posterior tilt of 20° and an anterior tilt greater than 10° in cases of Garden I and II femoral neck fractures increase the risk of fixation failure necessitating additional surgery. In this group of patients, there is a need for future interventional studies regarding the feasibility of primary hip arthroplasty.
-
Background and purpose - Unnecessary radiographic and clinical follow-ups are common in treatment of pediatric fractures. We hypothesized that follow-up radiographs are unnecessary to monitor union of physeal fractures of the distal tibia. Patients and methods - All 224 (147 boys) children under 16 years old treated for a physeal fracture of the distal tibia during a 5-year period (2010-14) in Helsinki Children's Hospital were included in this study. ⋯ Median 3 (1-7) follow-up appointments and median 3 (0-6) radiographs were taken. Follow-up radiographs at or before cast removal did not alter treatment in any of the patients. 223 patients' fractures healed within 4-9 weeks in good alignment (≤ 5° angulation). Interpretation - Routine radiographic follow-up is unnecessary to monitor alignment and union of physeal fractures of the distal tibia.
-
Background and purpose - A risk-stratification algorithm for metal-on-metal hip arthroplasty (MoMHA) patients was devised by US experts to help clinicians make management decisions. However, the proposed algorithm did not cover all potential patient or surgical abnormalities. Therefore we adapted the US risk-stratification algorithm in MoMHA patients revised for adverse reactions to metal debris (ARMD) to determine the variability in the revision threshold, and also whether high-risk patients had inferior outcomes following revision. ⋯ Interpretation - When applying the adapted risk-stratification algorithm the threshold for ARMD revision changed over time, presumably due to increasing evidence, patient surveillance, and investigation since 2012. Lower blood metal ion thresholds were used from 2012 for ARMD revisions; however, there was evidence that centres attached different importance to metal ions when managing patients. High-risk patients did not have inferior outcomes following ARMD revision.