Diabetes & vascular disease research : official journal of the International Society of Diabetes and Vascular Disease
-
Obstructive sleep apnoea (OSA) is very common in patients with Type 2 diabetes (T2D), which is not surprising considering that obesity is a common risk factor for both conditions. In general population studies, OSA has been shown to be associated with several comorbidities including increased risk of road traffic accidents, T2D, hypertension and lack of nocturnal dipping of blood pressure, hyperlipidaemia, increased inflammation, increased risk of cardiovascular disease and mortality, increased risk of atrial fibrillation, worse quality of life, and erectile dysfunction. ⋯ This unclarity regarding the impact of OSA and CPAP in patients with T2D has possibly contributed to the lack of screening for OSA in patients with T2D in the UK despite the high prevalence of OSA in patients with T2D. In this commentary, I provide an overview about OSA with a particular focus on its role and impact in patients with T2D.
-
In patients with diabetes mellitus, around 50% of deaths due to cardiovascular causes are sudden cardiac deaths. The prevalence of diabetes in cohorts with chronic heart failure is increasing, and while sudden cardiac death is an increasingly rare mode of death in chronic heart failure patients as a whole, the risk of this outcome remains high in those with diabetes. This review summarises the current knowledge on the incidence of sudden cardiac death in patients with diabetes and chronic heart failure, before discussing the causes of the excess risk seen in those with these coexistent conditions. We then describe current strategies for risk stratification and prevention of sudden cardiac death in these patients before discussing the priorities for further study in this area.
-
Diabetes is associated with an increased cardiovascular risk. The role for aspirin in diabetes is of high clinical interest. Guidelines recommend that primary prevention of cardiovascular disease (CVD) in diabetes with aspirin should be based on the individual risk for CVD. ⋯ The use of aspirin in diabetic patients for secondary prevention of CVD is supported by key evidence. The aim of the review is to present recent studies on aspirin for prevention of CVD in diabetes and to highlight its role also in view of new mechanistic and clinical studies with aspirin. Novel aspects of aspirin, e.g. its potential role for the prevention of cancer, are also presented.
-
We performed a meta-analysis of studies evaluating the effect of intensive glucose control on major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes from 1990 to 2009. A search of the published literature and the Cochran Central Register for Controlled Trials was performed using pre-specified inclusion criteria consisting of randomised controlled trials evaluating intensive glycaemic control and reporting the individual endpoints of all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and non-fatal stroke. Incident rate ratios for these endpoints were calculated using standard meta-analytic techniques of pooled data from eligible trials. ⋯ Intensive glucose control did not affect the incident rate ratio for all-cause mortality (1.01, 95% confidence interval 0.86-1.18, p=0.54) or stroke (1.02, 95% confidence interval 0.88-1.20, p=0.62). However, there was a statistically significant 14% reduction in non-fatal myocardial infarction in patients randomised to intensive glucose control (0.86, 95% confidence interval 0.77-0.97, p=0.015). Although intensification of glucose control did not affect mortality or non-fatal stroke, the risk for non-fatal myocardial infarction was significantly reduced in patients with type 2 diabetes.
-
We performed a meta-analysis of studies evaluating the effect of intensive glucose control on major adverse cardiovascular events in patients with type 2 diabetes from 1990 to 2009. A search of the published literature and the Cochran Central Register for Controlled Trials was performed using pre-specified inclusion criteria consisting of randomised controlled trials evaluating intensive glycaemic control and reporting the individual endpoints of all-cause mortality, non-fatal myocardial infarction, and non-fatal stroke. Incident rate ratios for these endpoints were calculated using standard meta-analytic techniques of pooled data from eligible trials. ⋯ Intensive glucose control did not affect the incident rate ratio for all-cause mortality (1.01, 95% confidence interval 0.86-1.18, p=0.54) or stroke (1.02, 95% confidence interval 0.88-1.20, p=0.62). However, there was a statistically significant 14% reduction in non-fatal myocardial infarction in patients randomised to intensive glucose control (0.86, 95% confidence interval 0.77-0.97, p=0.015). Although intensification of glucose control did not affect mortality or non-fatal stroke, the risk for non-fatal myocardial infarction was significantly reduced in patients with type 2 diabetes.