Giornale italiano di cardiologia : organo ufficiale della Federazione italiana di cardiologia : organo ufficiale della Società italiana di chirurgia cardiaca
-
G Ital Cardiol (Rome) · Jun 2018
Comparative Study[How to choose between intra-aortic balloon pump, Impella and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation].
The use of percutaneous mechanical circulatory support systems in the setting of both high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and cardiogenic shock is an emerging, controversial issue in contemporary clinical cardiology. The most common devices are the intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP), the Impella and the extracorporeal membrane oxygenator (ECMO). Technical progress, equipment improvement and growing cath-lab team expertise are allowing to offer critical patients different levels of assistance according to the selected device. ⋯ In these conditions mechanical support may be promising. The lack of benefit observed with the systematic use of the IABP (combined with the increased mortality associated with higher number of inotropic drugs) is actually prompting to increasingly consider Impella and ECMO use in critically ill patients. The development of multidisciplinary local protocols is considered pivotal to improve management and outcome of those patients requiring percutaneous circulatory support devices.
-
Although a new or worsening pericardial effusion is a diagnostic criterion for pericarditis, in clinical practice the presence of pericardial effusion does not necessarily imply the evidence of pericarditis. Up to 40-50% of cases of pericarditis do not show the presence of pericardial effusion (dry pericarditis). ⋯ A large, chronic pericardial effusion may have a good long-term prognosis even without routine drainage. In this paper, we will try to clarify common doubts and outline evidence-based approaches to diagnosis, therapy and follow-up of these patients, also addressing the possible complications and outcomes.