Giornale italiano di cardiologia : organo ufficiale della Federazione italiana di cardiologia : organo ufficiale della Società italiana di chirurgia cardiaca
-
G Ital Cardiol (Rome) · Jul 2020
Review[Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on admissions for acute coronary syndrome: review of the literature and single-center experience].
During the early phase of the lockdown following the COVID-19 pandemic, an alarm on the impact on cardiology admissions for cardiac causes, particularly in the field of acute coronary syndromes (ACS), has emerged. In order to evaluate this trend, we analyzed the literature data published since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic to date, in addition to our intensive cardiac care unit (ICCU) experience. ⋯ In conclusion, the lockdown imposed due to the spread of COVID-19 infection has led to a change in the number and type of cardiology admissions. It seems therefore necessary that patients, especially for time-dependent diseases such as ACS, continue to refer to hospital care; that contemporary standard of care for acute cardiac disease should be guaranteed, and that intensivist cardiologists acquire specific skills for the treatment of patients with clinical conditions normally treated by other specialists.
-
G Ital Cardiol (Rome) · Jul 2020
Review[Return to sport after the COVID-19 pandemic. How to behave?]
Italy, and all the world, has recently faced the arduous battle against the spread of a new coronavirus: SARS-CoV-2. This unexpected pandemic dramatically upended all areas of life, leading to a profound change in priorities, both in the medical as well as the social-economic field; and sports is no exception. Not surprisingly, the COVID-19 pandemic also walloped the world of sports. ⋯ Even the most popular sports in the world had to deal with the massive global threat of SARS-CoV-2. The Italian Sports Medical Federation (FMSI) has recently drawn up a protocol to be implemented when teams will receive from the authorities the permission to return to competitive activities. The purpose of this paper is to deepen the FMSI indications and allow wider dissemination and understanding.
-
G Ital Cardiol (Rome) · Feb 2020
[Temporary percutaneous ventricular assist devices for cardiogenic shock and high-risk percutaneous coronary intervention: a systematic literature review].
Percutaneous ventricular assist devices (pVADs) are frequently used for the treatment of patients with cardiogenic shock (CS) due to acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and as a support in percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for high-risk patients. CS is a clinical condition characterized by inadequate tissue perfusion due to cardiac dysfunction and for 80% of cases it is caused by AMI with left ventricular insufficiency. CS is responsible for about 50% of deaths in patients with myocardial infarction. Usually, PCIs do not require hemodynamic support, which could be however necessary in patients undergoing high-risk PCI. Presently, available pVADs in Europe are Impella 2.5, Impella CP, HeartMate PHP, TandemHeart, PulseCath iVAC2L. The aim of this review is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of pVADs in patients with refractory CS complicating AMI or undergoing high-risk PCI. ⋯ Our meta-analysis suggests similar results in terms of efficacy and safety between pVADs and control (IABP and medical therapy) for the treatment of patients with CS complicating AMI or undergoing high-risk PCI.