Women and birth : journal of the Australian College of Midwives
-
Marked differences exist between the maternal and neonatal outcomes of Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women and their babies compared with the outcomes for other Australian women and their babies. Australian government policies underline the need to increase the number of practising Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander midwives and nurses as a strategy for delivering culturally appropriate healthcare to improve health outcomes for Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander families. Additional challenges are experienced by Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander midwifery students providing Continuity of Care (COC) to Australian Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander childbearing women. One such example is the challenge presented due to the close connections and relationships that exist within some Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander cultures in terms of the maintenance of a professional relationship, in particular, the maintenance of professional boundaries. Whilst there is a growing body of evidence on the benefits to women of continuity of midwifery care models, little is known about the experiences of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander women who receive COC from Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander midwifery students. ⋯ Increasing the number of Australian Aboriginal and/or Torres Strait Islander midwives is essential to improving health outcomes for Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander childbearing women and their families. Caseload midwifery models with Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander midwives across Australia are needed. Health services, in partnership with Universities and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities, have a vital role to play in the development and expansion of these models.
-
Although surveys have identified that women are generally highly satisfied with maternity care provision, those aspects of care that women highlight as most important for achieving satisfaction and a satisfactory maternity care experience have not been reported. The aim of this study was to investigate how women understand and experience their maternity care and to report which aspects of care women highlight as most important. ⋯ Our study showed that women from a range of settings are more concerned with staff and relational issues than facilities. Differences in perceptions among primiparous versus multiparous women, at different stages of pregnancy and among women from rural and remote compared to urban settings highlight the need to include women with a diversity of experience when trying to understand the aspects of maternity care most important to women.
-
This research focuses on how women understand and experience labour as related to two competing views of childbirth pain. The biomedical view is that labour pain is abnormal and anaesthesia/analgesia use is encouraged to relieve the pain. The midwifery view is that pain is a normal part of labour that should be worked with instead of against. ⋯ Equal numbers of women expressed concerns with childbirth pain during the prenatal interviews, while more women choosing doctors spoke about pain after their births. Women had negative experiences when their planned pain relief method, either natural or medical, did not occur. The quandary facing women when it comes to labour pain relief is not choosing what they desire, but rather preparing themselves for the possibility that they may have to accept alternatives to their original preferences.