Journal of hospital medicine : an official publication of the Society of Hospital Medicine
-
In the past two decades, the incidence of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS) has risen fivefold, mirroring the rise of opioid use disorder (OUD) among pregnant women. The resulting increases in length of stay and neonatal intensive care utilization are associated with higher hospital costs, particularly among Medicaid-financed deliveries. Pregnant women with OUD require comprehensive medical and psychosocial evaluation and management; this combined with medication-assisted treatment is critical to optimize maternal and newborn outcomes. Multidisciplinary collaboration and standardized approaches to screening for intrauterine opioid exposure, evaluation and treatment of NAS, and discharge planning are important for clinical outcomes and may improve maternal experience of care.
-
Review
A STEEEP Hill to Climb: A Scoping Review of Assessments of Individual Hospitalist Performance.
Although ensuring high-quality care requires assessment of individual hospitalist performance, current assessment approaches lack consistency and coherence. The Institute of Medicine's STEEEP framework for quality healthcare conceptualizes quality through domains of "Safe," "Timely," "Effective," "Efficient," "Equitable," and "Patient Centered." This framework may be applicable to assessing individual hospitalists. ⋯ Applying the STEEEP framework to the published literature on assessment of individual hospitalist performance revealed strengths and weaknesses. Areas of strength were assessments of transitions of care and application of consensus guidelines. Other areas, such as equity and some components of safe practice, need development. All domains would benefit from more practical approaches. These findings should stimulate future work on feasibility of multidimensional assessment approaches.
-
Review
A STEEEP Hill to Climb: A Scoping Review of Assessments of Individual Hospitalist Performance.
Although ensuring high-quality care requires assessment of individual hospitalist performance, current assessment approaches lack consistency and coherence. The Institute of Medicine's STEEEP framework for quality healthcare conceptualizes quality through domains of "Safe," "Timely," "Effective," "Efficient," "Equitable," and "Patient Centered." This framework may be applicable to assessing individual hospitalists. ⋯ Applying the STEEEP framework to the published literature on assessment of individual hospitalist performance revealed strengths and weaknesses. Areas of strength were assessments of transitions of care and application of consensus guidelines. Other areas, such as equity and some components of safe practice, need development. All domains would benefit from more practical approaches. These findings should stimulate future work on feasibility of multidimensional assessment approaches.