La Radiologia medica
-
La Radiologia medica · May 1997
Comparative Study Clinical Trial[Comparison of magnetic resonance Spin-echo sequences and fat-suppressed sequences in bone diseases].
Thirty-two patients affected with skeletal conditions were examined with MRI using Short TI Inversion Recovery sequence and Spectral Presaturation with Inversion Recovery (SPIR) sequence as well as Spin-Echo (SE) T1-weighted sequence and Fast Spin-Echo (FSE) T2-weighted sequence to compare their value in the assessment of skeletal lesions. SPIR sequence was performed after intravenous injection of Gd-DTPA. The lesions included primary bone tumors (10 cases: 1 osteosarcoma, 1 periosteal sarcoma, 1 Ewing's sarcoma, 1 chondrosarcoma, 2 non-ossifying fibromas, 1 chondroma, 1 chondromyxoid fibroma, 1 desmoplastic fibroma and 1 bone cyst), metastases (7 cases: 3 prostate, 3 breast, 1 lung-squamous cell carcinoma), infections (12 cases: 9 osteomyelitis, 3 spondylodiscitis), sacroiliitis (1 case) and posttraumatic bone bruise (2 cases of bone marrow edema). ⋯ Quantitative evaluation showed statistically significant higher values of percent contrast (%C) and contrast-to-noise ratio (C/N) for STIR sequence compared with SPIR sequence (%C p < .004; C/N p < .040). This study suggests that STIR sequence and SE T1-weighted sequence provide high sensitivity in lesion detection and good anatomical definition. The use of a fat-suppressed sequence with Gd-DTPA can be useful for lesion characterization.
-
La Radiologia medica · May 1997
Comparative Study[Magnetic resonance of the brain: comparative assessment of conventional sequences versus fast sequences].
The conventional Spin-Echo sequences have been the most used acquisition techniques on Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) of the brain, since the beginning of 1990s. Recently, however, technological developments proposed such new fast acquisition techniques, with a dramatic reduction in acquisition time as Gradient Echo, Turbo Spin Echo, Gradient Spin Echo ed Echo Planar sequences. We investigated the comparative adequacy of the new fast sequences, in brain MR studies versus conventional sequences, on medium field strength MR equipment (.5 T). ⋯ In conclusion, the present study suggests that fast acquisition techniques can improve the conventional protocol of sequences, in the anatomical representation of the normal brain even with medium field strength equipment only on T2 and T1-IR weighted images. On T1-weighted imaging conventional SE acquisition technique is still the best choice. The time saving obtained with fast sequences can therefore be used for an overall improvement in the quality of images, and to apply accessory acquisition plans on routine exams.