Angiology
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
Remote ischemic preconditioning stimulus does not reduce microvascular resistance or improve myocardial blood flow in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention.
Remote ischemic preconditioning (RIPC) may limit myocardial infarction by improving microvascular function and maintaining myocardial blood flow. We hypothesized that a RIPC stimulus would reduce coronary microvascular resistance and improve coronary blood flow during elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). ⋯ RIPC stimuli during elective PCI do not affect coronary microvascular resistance or coronary flow in humans.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
A plaster combining diclofenac and heparin: microcirculatory evaluation in 2 models of high-perfusion microangiopathy.
A medicated plaster containing diclofenac epolamine (DHEP) and heparin has been recently proposed for the treatment of local trauma (ie, ankle sprains) accompanied by a clinically significant edema and/or hematoma formation, based on the combined antiinflammatory, hemorheologic, and antiedema properties of diclofenac and heparin. The aim of this study was therefore to compare the effects of a combined DHEP/heparin and DHEP alone in 2 clinical experimental models of microangiopathy, in order to provide a pharmacologic rationale for association of diclofenac and heparin. The microcirculation was evaluated by measuring cutaneous blood flow (laser Doppler) and transcutaneous oxygen and carbon dioxide pressures (TcPO(2) and TcPCO(2)) in 10 healthy volunteers before and after producing 2 microcirculatory models of microangiopathy: the models were based on reactive hyperemia (RH) and on local histamine injection, which both produce a significant increase in skin flux and alterations of TcPO(2) and TcPCO(2). ⋯ The inclusion of heparin in the plaster thus improved the control of the microcirculation achieved with diclofenac alone, when an experimental model of venous/arterial hyperemia and microangiopathy was used. In conclusion, DHEP in association with heparin modulates microcirculatory changes better than DHEP alone. It should be interesting to investigate the product in comparable clinical conditions in which it may be useful to act pharmacologically both on inflammation and microcirculatory disturbances that delay the recovery of patients.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Reliability and efficacy of metoprolol and diltiazem in patients having mild to moderate mitral stenosis with sinus rhythm.
The authors evaluated the effects of beta blockers (metoprolol) and calcium channel blockers (diltiazem) in patients having mild to moderate mitral stenosis (MS) with sinus rhythm. Eighty patients with a complaint of dyspnea with diagnosed MS were included in this study. Patients were randomized into metoprolol and diltiazem groups. ⋯ With respect to oxygen uptake rates, a statistically significant decrease was determined in the metoprolol group, whereas no difference was found in diltiazem group. The authors conclude that metoprolol may be useful in patients with MS and can provide symptomatic relief. They did not observe any beneficial effect of diltiazem in these patients.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Venous thrombosis from air travel: the LONFLIT3 study--prevention with aspirin vs low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) in high-risk subjects: a randomized trial.
The LONFLIT1 and 2 studies established that in high-risk subjects after long (>10 hours) flights, the incidence of deep venous thrombosis (DVT) may be between 4% and 6%, The LONFLIT3 study aimed to evaluate methods of prevention in high-risk subjects. Of 467 subjects contacted for the study, 300 were included. These 300 subjects at high risk for DVT were randomized, after informed consent, into three groups: 1) a control group that had no prophylaxis; 2) an aspirin treatment group, in which patients were treated with 400 mg (tablets of oral, soluble aspirin; one dose daily for 3 days, starting 12 hours before the beginning of the flight); and 3) a low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) group, in which one dose of enoxaparine was injected between 2 and 4 hours before the flight. ⋯ DVT was asymptomatic in 60% of subjects; 85% of DVTs were observed in passengers in non-aisle seats. Mild gastrointestinal symptoms were reported in 13% of patients taking aspirin. One dose of LMWH is an important option to consider in high-risk subjects during long-haul flights.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Clinical Trial
Superficial vein valve repair with a new external valve support (EVS). The IMES (International Multicenter EVS Study).
The aim of this international multicenter trial was to evaluate the effects of a new surgical device (Gore External Valve Support-EVS) and technique for external valvuloplasty of the long saphenous vein (LSV). Patients with superficial venous disease and venous hypertension due to pure superficial venous incompetence were randomized into two treatment groups, the first treated with "conventional treatment" (ligation or stripping) and the second with external valvuloplasty with the EVS. Patients with uncomplicated varicose veins within the age range of 35-65 years were included. ⋯ In conclusion results of the first year show efficacy and tolerability of the EVS. In selected patients (superficial LSV incompetence, reflux-dilatation, functional SFJ cusps, incompetence mainly due to enlargement of the vein), the EVS could be an effective alternative to "destructive" ligation and/or stripping of the vein. Prolonged follow-up will indicate the clinical potentials of the EVS.