The American journal of cardiology
-
The Starr-Edwards ball valve prosthesis is generally the standard by which other cardiac valve substitutes are compared. This report reviews information pertaining to several prostheses--the Beall mitral valve and the Bjork-Shiley, Braunwald-Cutter, Lillehei-Kaster and Smeloff-Cutter aortic and mitral valves--considered by some to have specific advantages over the Starr-Edwards valves. Hospital and late mortality rates after valve replacement are comparable for the four aortic valve prostheses reviewed and depend more on patient selection than on the specific prosthesis utilized. ⋯ On the basis of postoperative data, the five mitral valve prostheses reviewed do not appear to have substantial hemodynamic differences. For patients with a small left ventricular cavity the low profile prostheses, such as the Beall, Bjork-Shiley and Lillehei-Kaster, may be advantageous. Most available evidence indicates that patients receiving aortic or mitral valve prostheses should be given anticoagulant therapy postoperatively.
-
Advanced actuarial techniques are used to analyze late results in 912 patients who had isolated mitral or aortic valve replacement with ball valve prostheses from 1965 to 1974. Experience with noncloth-covered and cloth-covered valves is compared in terms of late survival, rate of thromboembolic complications and reoperation and the influence of anticoagulation. The cloth-covered prostheses have substantially reduced the incidence of emboli after mitral valve replacement (1.9 vs. 6 emboli per 100 patient years) and have thus far eliminated emboli after aortic valve replacement in patients receiving warfarin. ⋯ This should be prevented in the new model 2400 composite strut ("track") valve by a narrow metal track on the inner surface of each strut. The substantial recent reductions in operative mortality and in prosthesis-related complications pose important questions regarding timing of operations and selection of prostheses. These decisions must be individualized for each patient on the basis of a thorough analysis of late results using modern statistical methods.