The American journal of cardiology
-
Percutaneous coronary intervention can be safely performed in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS), including those with non-ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (MI), and unstable angina. Although there remains debate about whether an aggressive strategy involving early coronary arteriography and revascularization should be routinely performed in patients who present with non-ST-segment elevation MI and unstable angina, recent clinical trials suggest that an aggressive approach should be taken in both intermediate- and high-risk patients with ACS. There have been 4 clinical trials that have compared the outcomes of patients presenting with non-ST-segment elevation MI or unstable angina who were assigned to invasive or conservative strategies. ⋯ Event reductions were greatest in patients with non-ST-segment elevation MI or unstable angina at intermediate or high risk for an adverse outcome. Understanding that these subgroups comprise approximately 75% of patients presenting with non-ST-segment elevation MI or unstable angina, we believe that an invasive approach is indicated in most patients who develop non-ST-segment elevation MI or unstable angina. Regardless of the strategy used in ACS patients, lipid-lowering therapy is necessary to reduce recurrent ischemia events at the site of plaque instability and in atherosclerotic disease remote to the target lesion.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Impact of troponin T determinations on hospital resource utilization and costs in the evaluation of patients with suspected myocardial ischemia.
The evaluation and triage of patients with suspected myocardial ischemia in the emergency department remains challenging and costly. Previous studies of cardiac troponins have focused predominantly on patients with chest pain and have not randomized patients to different diagnostic strategies. Eight hundred fifty-six patients with suspected myocardial ischemia were prospectively randomized to receive a standard evaluation, including serial electrocardiographic and creatine phosphokinase-MB determinations (controls) or a standard evaluation with the addition of serial troponin T determinations (troponin group). ⋯ Total hospital charges were reduced in a similar fashion in troponin patients with and without acute coronary syndromes ($15,004 vs $19,202; p = 0.01, and $4,487 vs $6,187; p = 0.17, respectively) compared with controls. Troponin patients without acute coronary syndromes had fewer hospital admissions (25% vs 31%; p = 0.04), whereas troponin patients with acute coronary syndromes had shorter telemetry and coronary care unit lengths of stay (3.5 vs 4.5 days; p = 0.03) compared with controls. Thus, utilization of troponin T in a broad spectrum of emergency department patients with suspected myocardial ischemia improves hospital resource utilization and reduces costs.