Injury
-
Comparative Study
Nail-medullary canal ratio affects mechanical axis deviation during femoral lengthening with an intramedullary distractor.
Callus distraction of the femur using an intramedullary distractor has several advantages over the use of external fixators. However, difficulty in controlling the mechanical axis during lengthening may cause deformities and knee osteoarthritis. Purpose of the study is to answer the following questions: (1) is lengthening with an intramedullary device associated with a medial or lateral shift of the mechanical axis? (2) Which factors are associated with varisation/valgisation of the mechanical axis during lengthening? ⋯ Level IV, therapeutic study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.
-
Resuscitation can be delayed, or impaired, by insufficient vascular access. This study examines whether dual-intraosseous needles, inserted into a single porcine humerus, can facilitate rapid and concomitant fluid and medication delivery. ⋯ This is the first published study evaluating dual-intraosseous needles in a single bone. Despite limitations, this preliminary study (using a porcine humerus) suggests that dual-intraosseous needles are feasible. For critically-ill patients with limited insertion sites, dual-intraosseous (a.k.a. 'double-barrelled resuscitation') may facilitate rapid and concurrent resuscitation.
-
While there is conflicting evidence regarding the importance of anatomic reduction for tibial plateau fractures, there are currently no studies that analyse our ability to grade reduction based on fluoroscopic imaging. The purpose of this study was to determine the accuracy of fluoroscopy in judging tibial plateau articular reduction. ⋯ Using both AP and lateral views for 5mm displacement had the highest accuracy, specificity, and ICC. Outside of this scenario, agreement was poor to moderate and accuracy was low. Applying this clinically, direct visualization of the articular surface may be necessary to ensure malreduction less than 5mm.
-
The aim of every patient with hip fracture is to regain previous function but we know little about the outcome, especially patient-reported outcome. We wanted to investigate what factors influence the result one year after hip fracture, including fast-track for hip fracture patients, as well as investigating the patients' satisfaction with their rehabilitation and to what degree they regained their pre-fracture function. ⋯ General complications seem to be the major risk factor, being the only factor affecting functional outcome and together with local complications affecting pain and satisfaction. To avoid general complications, co-operation between orthopaedic surgeons and internists may be crucial in the aftercare of hip fracture patients. A majority did not receive adequate rehabilitation and efforts need to be made to improve the rehabilitation process.