Injury
-
Seasonality of pediatric trauma has been previously described, although the association of season with hour of presentation is less understood. Both factors have potential implications for resource allocation and team preparedness. ⋯ These data demonstrate the significant seasonal and temporal variation within pediatric trauma. These findings could be used to inform improvements in emergency response, and resource allocation in particular.
-
Shock index paediatric-adjusted (SIPA) was presented for early prediction of mortality and trauma team activation in paediatric trauma patients. However, the derived cut-offs of normal vital signs were based on old references. We established alternative SIPAs based on the other commonly used references and compared their predictive values. ⋯ The ATLS-based shock index achieved the highest PPV and specificity compared to SIPA, uSIPA, and SIPALS for adverse outcomes in paediatric trauma.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study
Splint versus no splint after ankle fracture fixation; Results from the multi-centre post-operative ankle splint trial (PAST).
There is considerable variation in the rehabilitation of ankle fractures. Ankle fractures treated surgically are often immobilized or splinted in the early post-operative period, despite the lack of robust evidence supporting this intervention. Thus, this randomized controlled trial aims to investigate the anecdote that splinting reduces pain and oedema. ⋯ A total of 104 comparable participants were included; 54 in the non-splint group and 50 in the splint group. There was no significance difference in ankle oedema, ankle oedema compared to contralateral ankle and pain scores between the two groups (P = 0.56, P = 0.25, P = 0.39 respectively). Patient satisfaction was higher in the early postoperative period in the non-splint group (P = 0.016). The AOFAS score was not significantly different across any time point (P = 0.534). In the splint group, there was a 46% rate of splint-related complaints and complications. Unplanned ER visits occurred in 46% of the splint group and 7.4% of the non-splint group (P < 0.001). There were 2 wound infections, 1 non-union and 1 deep vein thrombosis in the splint group. There was 1 wound infection and 1 deep vein thrombosis in the no-splint group (P = 0.481) CONCLUSION: The routine use of a splint does not add any perceivable benefit to the postoperative course of an ankle fracture fixation, particularly in the reduction of oedema and postoperative pain. Another key finding is that the absence of a splint does not appear to result in higher complication rates, instead leads to higher unplanned ER visits and lower early satisfaction rates.
-
Multicenter Study Observational Study
Comparison of in-situ release and submuscular anterior transposition of ulnar nerve for refractory cubital tunnel syndrome, previously treated with subfascial anterior transfer-A retrospective study of 24 cases.
Although cubital tunnel syndrome is the second most common type of compressive neuropathy in the upper extremities, the indication and optimal surgical method for recurrent or refractory cubital tunnel syndrome remains controversial. This study evaluates the functional outcomes of revision surgery for cubital tunnel syndrome. ⋯ The outcomes of this study imply that in-situ neurolysis may be as effective as anterior submuscular transfer of ulnar nerve for refractory cubital tunnel syndrome after anterior subfascial transfer.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study
Outcomes of cement augmentation in fragility trochanteric hip fractures - A multicenter randomized controlled trial follow-up.
Cement augmentation is considered to improve the bone-implant construct stability in hip fragility fractures, additionally biomechanical studies show that cement augmentation improves the pull-out strength and increases resistance to failure. Thus far, the advantage of these technique used in a clinical scenario is yet to be determined METHODS: a randomized, multicenter, single-blinded clinical trial was conducted in patients aged 65 years or older who were admitted to two level I trauma centers with a fragility intertrochanteric hip fracture during September 2015 and December 2017. Patients were stratified into 2 groups: patients between 65 and 85 years and older than 85 years. A balanced block randomization was performed using blocks of 6 patients: 3 patients assigned to the control group (no augmentation) and 3 patients to the intervention group. Follow-up visits were done at 1, 3, 6 and 12 postoperative months documenting the tip-apex distance (TAD) as well as followed up after 5 to 7 years of surgical procedure documenting EQ5D, Parker Mobility Score and mortality rates at these different time points. ⋯ The use of augmentation can be considered a safe procedure for the fixation of fragility hip fractures.