International journal of clinical pharmacy
-
Review Meta Analysis
Duloxetine for the reduction of opioid use in elective orthopedic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Background Duloxetine is currently approved for chronic pain management; however, despite some evidence, its utility in acute, postoperative pain remains unclear Aim of the review This systematic review and meta-analysis is to determine if duloxetine 60 mg given perioperatively, is safe and effective at reducing postoperative opioid consumption and reported pain following elective orthopedic surgery. Method CINAHL, Medline, Cochrane Central Registry for Clinical Trials, Google Scholar, and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched using a predetermined search strategy from inception to January 15, 2019. Covidence.org was used to screen, select, and extract data by two independent reviewers. ⋯ Adverse effects included an increase in insomnia with duloxetine but lower rates of nausea and vomiting. Meta-analysis revealed statistically significant [mean difference (95% CI)] lower total opioid use with duloxetine postoperatively at 24 h [- 31.9 MME (- 54.22 to - 9.6), p = 0.005], 48 h [- 30.90 MME (- 59.66 to - 2.15), p = 0.04] and overall [- 31.68 MME (- 46.62 to - 16.74), p < 0.0001]. Conclusion These results suggest that adding perioperative administration duloxetine 60 mg to a multimodal analgesia regimen within the orthopedic surgery setting significantly lowers total postoperative opioid consumption and reduces pain without significant adverse effects.
-
Meta Analysis
Systematic review and network meta-analysis of treatment for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis.
Background Biological drugs for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis have changed the therapeutic perspective, while small-molecule inhibitors and new promising drugs suggest new options. Aim Assess comparative efficacy and safety of biological and new small oral drugs: commercialized and under-investigation ones for patients naïve to biological drugs. Methods A systematic review was conducted to identify the randomized clinical trials phase 2 or 3, in adults with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis treated with biological drugs (infliximab, adalimumab, golimumab, vedolizumab and etrolizumab) or new oral small molecules (tofacitinib and ozanimod) as first line. ⋯ Conclusion This network meta-analysis suggests infliximab may be the best therapeutic option for moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis. Vedolizumab seems to have better outcomes in maintenance than in induction therapy and it appears superior to golimumab and adalimumab. Tofacitinib, ozanimod and etrolizumab show encouraging results.
-
Meta Analysis
Influence of dexmedetomidine on cardiac complications in non-cardiac surgery: a meta-analysis of randomized trials.
Background The cardiac protection of dexmedetomidine (Dex) in peri-operative period of patients with non-cardiac surgery is still controversial. Aim of the Review We aimed to evaluate the influence of Dex on cardiac complications in peri-operative period of non-cardiac surgery by using a meta-analysis. Methods PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane library and Springer databases were searched for relevant studies. ⋯ In subgroup analysis, the risk of bradycardia was significantly higher in 1.0 μg/kg Dex group than that in placebo group. Besides, a higher risk of hypotension in 0.5 μg/kg Dex group than that in placebo group was found. Conclusions Dex supplement might not reduce the risk of cardiac complications but increases the risk of hypotension and bradycardia in peri-operative period of patients who underwent non-cardiac surgeries.
-
Review Meta Analysis
Risk factors for QTc-prolongation: systematic review of the evidence.
Background QTc-interval prolongation has been associated with serious adverse events, such as Torsade de Pointes and sudden cardiac death. In the prevention of QTc-prolongation, special attention should go to high-risk patients. Aim of the review The aim of this review is to summarize and assess the evidence for different risk factors for QTc-prolongation (demographic factors, comorbidities, electrolytes, QTc-prolonging medication). ⋯ Very strong evidence was found for hypokalemia, use of diuretics, antiarrhythmic drugs and QTc-prolonging drugs of list 1 of CredibleMeds. Little or no evidence was found for hyperlipidemia, the use of digoxin or statins, neurological disorders, diabetes, renal failure, depression, alcohol abuse, heart rate, pulmonary disorders, hormone replacement therapy, hypomagnesemia, history of a prolonged QTc-interval/Torsade de Pointes, familial history of cardiovascular disease, and the use of only QTc-prolonging drugs of list 2 or 3 of CredibleMeds. Conclusion This systematic review gives a clear overview of the available evidence for a broad range of risk factors for QTc-prolongation.
-
Review Meta Analysis
Evaluation of pharmacist care for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
In chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the value of pharmacist care is not clear. Aim of the review A systematic review was conducted to clarify the impact of pharmacist care for outpatients with COPD. ⋯ Pharmacist care resulted in improvements in the medication compliance as well as reductions in hospital admissions and health-related costs. It is therefore a potent strategy for management of outpatients with COPD.