European journal of pharmacology
-
Naloxone is known to decrease, increase or have no effect on nociceptive thresholds. Here, using two commonly accepted pain-related behaviors (licking and flinching) associated with injection of noxious formalin into a hind paw in rats, naloxone (0.1-1 mg/kg s.c.) simultaneously decreases and increases nociceptive responding in the same animal. Licking, which is reduced by naloxone, is enhanced by low doses but attenuated by high doses of morphine. ⋯ Both actions of naloxone can be interpreted in terms of a leftward shift in the formalin concentration-response curves. This study demonstrates that naloxone can increase formalin-induced flinching while simultaneously decreasing licking behavior. These findings suggest that, on its own, an unexpected decrease in a single nociceptive index may be an inadequate criterion for demonstrating antinociception.
-
Intrathecally administered mu-opioid (morphine; DAMGO ([D-Ala2,N-MePhe4,Gly5-ol]enkephalin)) and delta-opioid (DPDPE ([D-Pen2,D-Pen5] enkephalin); DADLE ([D-Ala2,D-Leu5]enkephalin)) receptor preferring agonists were systematically challenged with the competitive opiate antagonists naloxone or naltrindole in the rat. Naloxone produced a dose-dependent reduction in agonist effect with the intrathecal IC50 being similar for all agonists (2.1-5.4 micrograms). In contrast, the naltrindole antagonist profile was (IC50 in micrograms) DPDPE (4.0); morphine (23.5); DADLE (> 30) and DAMGO (> 30). Three points are emphasized: (1) antagonism of DPDPE and not DAMGO by naltrindole suggests two distinct opioid sites; (2) a similar potency for naloxone against these agonists suggests that the agonists may act upon spinal sites for which naloxone has comparable affinity or that they may act upon separate sites which are functionally coupled and that the action of naloxone on one or the other site is responsible for the antagonism; and (3) given the modest cross-tolerance between DADLE and mu agonists, the failure of naltrindole to antagonize DADLE suggests that in the rat this peptide acts through a delta site different from that acted upon by DPDPE.