European journal of clinical pharmacology
-
Eur. J. Clin. Pharmacol. · Jan 1984
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialComparison of a traditional paracetamol medication and a new paracetamol/paracetamol-methionine ester combination.
The SUR 2647 combination is a sachet formulation containing free paracetamol and its N-acetyl-methionate ester (SUR 2647). In a randomized, single-blind, between-patient study the onset of analgesia, duration and efficacy of the SUR 2647 combination vs paracetamol was investigated in out-patients after oral surgery. One group (n = 27) received sachets of SUR 2647 combination 2 b.i.d. (equivalent to 2 g paracetamol X 2) on the day of operation, and one sachet b.i.d. (equivalent to 1 g paracetamol X 2) for the following two days. ⋯ Mean pain scores showed that the SUR 2647 combination regime reduced pain significantly more than the paracetamol regime from 0.5 to 3.0 h after initiation of medication. The mean pain scores did not show a significant difference during the remaining observation period. Mild to moderate drowsiness was reported in both treatment groups, but it was more common in subjects given SUR 2647 combination.
-
The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of pancuronium were studied following intravenous infusion in eleven patients undergoing surgical anaesthesia. Measurement of the plasma concentrations (Cp) of the neuromuscular blocking agent ( NMBA ) and the concomitant intensities of paralysis allowed their simultaneous modelling. The pharmacokinetic parameters derived for pancuronium were in the range of previously reported values, except that the mean total systemic plasma clearance (0.79 +/- 0.28 ml X min-1 X kg-1) was reduced and the mean terminal phase half-life (169 min) was longer in these patients. ⋯ Using this latter approach, the ECp50 estimated during onset of paralysis was significantly higher than that estimated during offset of paralysis (p less than 0.05); no such difference was apparent between this latter parameter and the ECpss (50) of the integrated effect model (p greater than 0.05). No significant differences were observed between any of the pharmacodynamic parameter estimates generated from the data obtained from the two methods of assessment of neuromuscular function (mechanical vs. EMG response) (p greater than 0.05).