Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Feb 1987
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialPain relief after major abdominal surgery: a double-blind controlled comparison of sublingual buprenorphine, intramuscular buprenorphine, and intramuscular meperidine.
In a double-blind randomized study of three groups of 18 patients scheduled for major abdominal surgery the efficacy and side effects of sublingual buprenorphine were tested and compared to intramuscular meperidine and buprenorphine. Single doses of either 75 mg of meperidine, 0.4 mg of sublingual buprenorphine, or 0.3 mg of intramuscular buprenorphine were used. Patients given buprenorphine as sublingual tablets were significantly more conscious in the immediate postoperative period (Glasgow Coma Scale) than when given buprenorphine or meperidine intramuscularly. ⋯ Three cases of respiratory acidosis in the meperidine group required IPPV treatment, and one case in the intramuscular buprenorphine group required treatment. Sedation and nausea were the most common side effects in all three groups. We conclude that sublingual buprenorphine is useful for relief of postoperative pain and exhibited administrative advantages, when the patients were able to cooperate.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Feb 1987
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialHemodynamic effects of esmolol in chronically beta-blocked patients undergoing aortocoronary bypass surgery.
The hemodynamic effects of esmolol were studied in 40 patients scheduled for elective coronary artery surgery to determine whether the administration of esmolol in chronically beta-blocked patients would result in additional attenuation of sympathetically mediated hemodynamic stress responses to noxious stimuli. Patients were randomly assigned to receive IV infusions of esmolol or 5% dextrose in water (D5W). All received their regular dose of beta-adrenergic blocker within 6 hr of surgery and were anesthetized with diazepam, pancuronium, and enflurane. ⋯ However the incidence and magnitude of SNP use in the control group was significantly (P less than 0.05) greater. Thus, the lower blood pressure, in the absence of changes in systemic vascular resistance, cardiac index, heart rate, and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure points toward a decrease in myocardial contractility, suggesting that the addition of esmolol to chronically used beta-blockers resulted in an additional negative inotropic effect. We conclude that in patients with coronary artery disease in whom chronic beta-blocker therapy is continued until the time of surgery, esmolol does not further attenuate the heart rate response but does attenuate the increase in blood pressure.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Feb 1987
Hypertonic saline as a resuscitation solution in hemorrhagic shock: effects on extravascular lung water and cardiopulmonary function.
To determine the effect of resuscitation with hypertonic saline on extravascular lung water, seven adult sheep were endotracheally intubated; mean arterial pressure (MAP), pulmonary artery pressure (PAP), pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), and central venous pressure (CVP) were monitored. A 5-French, thermistor-tipped catheter was used to measure extravascular lung water (EVLW). Colloid oncotic pressure (COP), serum electrolytes and osmolality, and arterial and mixed venous blood gas tensions were measured. ⋯ Throughout the study, EVLW did not vary despite a COP-PCWP gradient less than 4 mm Hg. Serum sodium levels and serum osmolality were significantly above baseline values after resuscitation. In this animal model of hemorrhagic shock, infusion of hypertonic saline effected resuscitation without compromising cardiopulmonary function or increasing EVLW.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Feb 1987
Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical TrialPlain or hyperbaric bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia.
Three ml of bupivacaine 0.5%, either plain or in 8% glucose, was injected intrathecally in three groups of twenty patients. Group 1 received bupivacaine 0.5% plain; group 2 received bupivacaine 0.5% in 8% glucose. Patients in groups 1 and 2 were kept sitting for 3 min after injection. ⋯ Motor blockade of the lower extremities was more intense in the patients who were kept sitting for 3 min (groups 1 and 2). It is concluded that both solutions are equally suitable for spinal anesthesia, provided patients receiving the plain solution are kept sitting for at least 2 min. When using hyperbaric bupivacaine, posture seems to have no influence on cephalad spread.