Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 1992
Comparative StudyComparison of two techniques to inflate the bronchial cuff of the Univent tube.
The Univent tube is an endotracheal tube with a movable bronchial blocker. The blocker cuff reportedly exhibits high-pressure characteristics when inflated to seal any adult bronchus. This study was aimed at measuring the cuff volume that would seal the bronchus when two different techniques of cuff inflation were used. ⋯ The bronchial cuff was then inflated until air bubbles ceased to appear in the beaker. Direct measurement of compliance of the blocker cuff confirmed its high-pressure characteristics. Bronchial sealing volume ranged from 3 to 5 mL when measured with the NPT and from 4 to 6 mL when measured with the PPT.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 1992
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialEpidural patient-controlled analgesia: influence of bupivacaine and hydromorphone basal infusion on pain control after cesarean delivery.
Epidural administration of hydromorphone was evaluated using a patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) delivery system in 170 healthy women undergoing elective cesarean delivery with epidural bupivacaine who were randomly assigned to one of four epidural PCA treatment groups: group I, hydromorphone alone by bolus administration; group II, hydromorphone, with a continuous (basal) infusion; group III, hydromorphone in combination with 0.08% bupivacaine by bolus administration; or group IV, hydromorphone and bupivacaine, with a concurrent infusion of both drugs. Patients in group I required significantly less opioid medication (2.1 +/- 1.1 mg [mean +/- SD]) during the first 24 h than patients in group II (3.3 +/- 1.3 mg). ⋯ In addition, patients in all four groups had similar pain, sedation, discomfort, fatigue, and anxiety scores. The frequency of awakening at night to self-administer analgesic medication was not decreased when a basal infusion was used.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 1992
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialIsoflurane and nitrous oxide: comparative impact on cerebrospinal fluid pressure in patients with brain tumors.
The relative effects on cerebrospinal fluid pressure (CSFP) of equipotent concentrations of isoflurane and N2O were compared in 20 patients with brain tumors who had lumbar subarachnoid catheters in place. Patients were randomly assigned to receive one of two anesthetic sequences: group 1, 0.7% end-tidal isoflurane in O2, which was changed to 70% N2O in O2; or group 2, 70% N2O in O2, which was changed to 0.7% end-tidal isoflurane in O2. End-tidal PCO2 and percent end-tidal N2O and isoflurane were monitored by mass spectrometry from just before changing anesthetics (time = 0 min) until the end of a 20-min observation period (time = 20 min). ⋯ The patients in group 1 sustained an increase in CSFP that reached a maximum of 33% above the value at 0 min, despite a 3-mm Hg decrease in PaCO2 (P < 0.05). By contrast, CSFP remained unchanged in group 2. Although the absolute increase in CSFP after replacement of isoflurane/O2 by N2O/O2 anesthesia was relatively small (9 +/- 1 to 12 +/- 2 mm Hg; P < 0.05), the absence of a similar effect in patients where N2O was replaced by isoflurane suggests that replacement of isoflurane by an equipotent concentration of N2O is more likely to lead to an increase in CSFP in patients with altered intracranial dynamics than is replacement of N2O by isoflurane.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 1992
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialTracheal intubation without the use of muscle relaxants: a technique using propofol and varying doses of alfentanil.
We have noted that tracheal intubation can be accomplished in many patients after induction of anesthesia with propofol and alfentanil without the simultaneous use of muscle relaxants. This study was designed to evaluate airway and intubating conditions after administration of propofol and alfentanil in 75 ASA physical status I or II outpatients with Mallampati class I airways undergoing various surgical procedures. The patients were randomly assigned to one of five groups for induction of anesthesia. ⋯ Intubation of the trachea was performed and patient response was noted. Heart rate and arterial blood pressure were also recorded before induction of anesthesia, after induction, and then again after intubation of the trachea. The lungs of all patients were easily ventilated via mask, and the jaw was judged to be relaxed in all patients.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 1992
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialNalbuphine is better than naloxone for treatment of side effects after epidural morphine.
This study compared naloxone and nalbuphine when administered for treatment of side effects after epidural morphine, 5 mg, given for postcesarean analgesia. Patients requesting treatment for pruritus or nausea randomly received, in a double-blind fashion, up to three intravenous doses of either naloxone 0.2 mg (group 1; n = 20) or nalbuphine 5 mg (group 2; n = 20). The incidence of vomiting, the severity of nausea and pruritus, and the degree of sedation and pain were assessed before and 30 min after each dose. ⋯ Other than decreased pruritus after the second dose with both drugs, no further changes occurred. We conclude that nalbuphine is superior to naloxone for the treatment of side effects after epidural morphine. However, persistent symptoms may require supplemental therapy, as repeated doses proved less effective than the initial dose.