Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Apr 1992
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialComparison of propofol versus ketamine for anesthesia in pediatric patients undergoing cardiac catheterization.
Intravenous propofol was compared with ketamine in 20 pediatric patients undergoing cardiac catheterization. The study patients were randomly assigned to treatment groups so that 10 patients received ketamine and 10 patients received propofol. The hemodynamic responses and recovery characteristics of the two groups were compared. ⋯ Time to full recovery (mean +/- SD) was significantly less in the propofol group (24 +/- 19 min vs 139 +/- 87 min, P less than 0.001). In the ketamine group only, significant correlations (P less than 0.05) included time to full recovery with duration of anesthetic (r = 0.71) and time to full recovery with total drug dose per kilogram (r = 0.82). The authors conclude that propofol anesthesia is a practical alternative for pediatric patients undergoing elective cardiac catheterization and may be preferable to ketamine because of the significantly shorter recovery time.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Apr 1992
Comparative StudyComparison of the endotracheal tube and laryngeal mask in airway management by paramedical personnel.
An evaluation of the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) as a means of airway support when used by paramedical personnel was performed. Forty medical and paramedical students attempted to intubate the tracheas of 40 healthy anesthetized adults with the LMA and a cuffed endotracheal tube (ETT). The number of attempts to achieve correct placement and the time taken to adequately ventilate the lungs were recorded for both devices. ⋯ Five students were unable to intubate the trachea after three attempts with the ETT, but all positioned the LMA satisfactorily on their first try in a mean time of 40 s. We conclude that unskilled operators with minimal training can safely and successfully ventilate unconscious patients more rapidly using the LMA than the ETT. These results suggest the LMA should be available in all areas where resuscitation is performed.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Apr 1992
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialA comparison between preincisional and postincisional lidocaine infiltration and postoperative pain.
We conducted a randomized, double-blind trial to compare the efficacy of preincisional and postincisional wound infiltration with 1% lidocaine (40 mL) on the postoperative pain of 37 patients scheduled for elective inguinal herniotomy. The demand for additional postoperative analgesics occurred earlier in those who received lidocaine infiltration after incision (165 min) than in those who received preincisional lidocaine (225 min, P less than 0.05). The preincisional lidocaine infiltration group also had fewer patients requiring supplemental analgesics (58%) than the postincisional group (94%) (P less than 0.05). We conclude that preincisional infiltration of the surgical wound with lidocaine is a more effective method of providing postoperative analgesia than is postincisional infiltration.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Apr 1992
ReviewPreoperative cardiac evaluation for noncardiac surgery: a functional approach.
The preoperative assessment of the high risk patient undergoing noncardiac surgery has traditionally been based on history, physical examination, and preoperative testing. We propose a method of assessing preoperative risk based on the presentation of coronary artery disease, exercise tolerance, and extent of the surgical procedure. Since this is an evolving field, as new information and perioperative management techniques become available, the preoperative evaluation of the high risk patient will change. ⋯ In the patient at risk of but without overt symptoms of coronary artery disease, the number of clinical risk factors can determine the probability of coronary artery disease in the individual patient. The decision to perform preoperative revascularization should be based on its anticipated improvement of both the short- and long-term prognosis of the patient considering the risk of such procedures. The objective assessment of LVEF should be performed in patients with a poor exercise tolerance with either a high risk of perioperative ischemia or a suspicion of cardiomyopathy.