Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 1995
Comparative Study Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical TrialAnalgesic and hemodynamic effects of epidural clonidine, clonidine/morphine, and morphine after pancreatic surgery--a double-blind study.
This study characterizes analgesia an hemodynamics after epidural clonidine 8 micrograms/kg (Group C) or clonidine 4 micrograms/kg+morphine 2 mg (Group CM) in comparison to epidural morphine 50 micrograms/kg (Group M). Forty-five patients scheduled for pancreatectomy in combined general/epidural anesthesia were studied. The study drugs were administered 75 min postoperatively and for 10 h pain intensity (visual analog scale [VAS]), heart rate (HR), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and cardiac output (CO) were measured; filling pressures were kept > 5 mm Hg. ⋯ In Groups C and CM, HR, CO, and MAP were reduced significantly compared to baseline within the first 15-90 min, while stroke volume and systemic vascular resistance remained stable. We conclude, that hemodynamic alteration after epidural clonidine under conditions of stable filling pressures is caused mainly by a decrease in HR. It is not an effect of analgesia but of the intrinsic antihypertensive action of clonidine.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 1995
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe hemodynamic responses to an intravenous test dose in vascular surgical patients.
The study was designed to investigate the hemodynamic responses to intravenous (IV) injections of various epidural test doses in vascular surgical patients to determine whether previously established criteria in healthier populations were valid in this inherently sicker population. A double-blind, prospective randomized study was performed on 50 patients, not receiving beta-adrenergic antagonists, presenting for vascular surgery and requiring an arterial line. Patients were randomly assigned to receive a 3-mL injection of one of five solutions, either saline (Group 1), lidocaine 45 mg (Group 2), lidocaine 45 mg and epinephrine 5 micrograms (Group 3), lidocaine 45 mg and epinephrine 10 micrograms (Group 4), or lidocaine 45 mg and epinephrine 15 micrograms (Group 5). ⋯ The mean increase in HR and SBP within Group 5 was 17.0 +/- 5.9 bpm and 31.0 +/- 10.5 mm Hg, respectively. No differences were found between groups for time to maximum change for HR and SBP which for Group 5 were 64.5 +/- 37.4 s and 90.0 +/- 56.7 s, respectively. To achieve 100% sensitivity and specificity for HR increase, the criterion established was > or = 9 bpm.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 1995
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialThe incidence of gastroesophageal reflux with the laryngeal mask: a comparison with the face mask using esophageal lumen pH electrodes.
To test the hypothesis that the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) predisposes patients to gastroesophageal reflux, we randomly assigned 55 patients having elective surgery to receive standardized anesthesia with the LMA or with conventional face mask (FM) plus airway. A pH-sensitive probe with two electrodes, 10 cm apart, was passed nasally into the esophagus 1 h before induction of anesthesia, and recordings were made continuously until 30 min after surgery. At the distal electrode, 30 cm from the anterior nares, there was a significant difference in the incidence of reflux: 53.6% with the LMA versus 22.2% with the FM (P < 0.05). ⋯ Reflux events continued in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) in both groups with no significant difference between groups. There was no clinical evidence of aspiration of gastric contents in either group. Use of the LMA appears to result in increased reflux to the level of the mid to upper esophagus, and is associated with a more frequent incidence of multiple reflux events than use of the FM.