Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Oct 1996
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialAwakening, clinical recovery, and psychomotor effects after desflurane and propofol anesthesia.
We compared postanesthetic and residual recovery of desflurane versus propofol anesthesia. Twenty volunteers were anesthetized for 1 h at 1-wk intervals with either propofol (induction) plus desflurane (1.25 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration) in O2 (PD), propofol plus desflurane in N2O-O2 (PDN), propofol plus propofol infusion with N2O-O2 (PPN), or desflurane (induction) plus desflurane in O2 (DD). Awakening and clinical recovery were measured. ⋯ At 1 h after anesthesia, the subjects given desflurane for maintenance (PD, PDN, and DD) performed significantly (P < 0.05-0.01) better in several psychomotor tests compared with those whose anesthesia was maintained with propofol (PPN). However, subjects met criteria for home readiness as fast after PPN as after PDN anesthesia (mean times +/- SE until fitness for discharge were 126 +/- 20, 81 +/- 14, 70 +/- 7, and 106 +/- 14 min after PD, PDN, PPN, and DD, respectively). Awakening and early psychomotor recovery for as long as 1 h after anesthesia is faster after desflurane than after propofol, but there was no difference in time to home readiness or in residual effects thereafter between propofol and desflurane with N2O in O2.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Oct 1996
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialSpinal bupivacaine in ambulatory surgery: the effect of saline dilution.
The safety of lidocaine spinal anesthesia has recently been called into question by reports of both permanent and transient neurologic toxicity. This study explored the possibility of adapting the longer acting spinal bupivacaine to ambulatory surgery. Sixty patients presenting for ambulatory arthroscopy were randomized to four groups receiving the following spinal anesthetics: Group I (15 mg bupivacaine), 3 mL of 0.5% spinal bupivacaine in 8% dextrose; Group II (10 mg bupivacaine), 2 mL of the 0.5% spinal bupivacaine+1 mL saline; Group III (7.5 mg bupivacaine), 1.5 mL of the 0.5% spinal bupivacaine%1.5 mL saline; Group IV (5 mg bupivacaine), 1 mL of the 0.5% spinal bupivacaine+2 mL saline. ⋯ The intensity of sensory block also decreased from group to group with four patients in Group IV having pain intraoperatively that required further treatment. Therefore, Group III provided the optimum combination of adequate depth of anesthesia and rapid recovery. The results of this study indicate that spinal anesthesia with 7.5 mg of 0.5% bupivacaine in 8% dextrose diluted with an equal volume of saline provides an acceptable spinal anesthetic for ambulatory arthroscopy with a recovery profile appropriate to the ambulatory setting.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Oct 1996
Comparative StudyModerate primary pulmonary hypertension in patients undergoing liver transplantation.
Primary pulmonary hypertension (PPH) in patients with hepatic cirrhosis is often considered an unacceptable condition for liver transplantation because of increased morbidity and mortality during the procedure. We studied the incidence, characteristics, and final outcome of patients with PPH undergoing liver transplantation in our institution. Among the 226 patients undergoing 257 liver transplantations, eight (3.5%) fulfilled the conditions of PPH and responded to vasodilator therapy. ⋯ All patients with PPH required pulmonary vasodilator therapy after reperfusion of the new liver, while none in the group of patients without PPH required this therapy. Furthermore, after graft reperfusion, patients with PPH in which venovenous bypass was not used (n = 3), had a more compromised right ventricular function with a greater increase of central venous pressure (CVP) (90%) and MPAP (140%) when compared with patients with bypass or preservation of the recipient's vena cava (n = 5) in whom the increase of CVP and MPAP was 50% and 60%, respectively. Moderate PPH without a fixed level of pulmonary hypertension in patients undergoing liver transplantation is not related to an adverse outcome.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Oct 1996
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialTranscutaneous cranial electrical stimulation (Limoge's currents) decreases early buprenorphine analgesic requirements after abdominal surgery.
Transcutaneous cranial electrical stimulation with Limoge's currents (TCES) consists of high frequency, low intensity currents which decreased anesthetic requirements during elective surgery. This action is likely to be mediated by the release of central endogenous opioids. In the present study, we hypothesized that TCES applied intraoperatively may decrease early postoperative narcotic requirements. ⋯ Intraoperative isoflurane anesthetic requirements, as well as hourly postoperative scores for pain and sedation, were the same for the two groups. These data indicate that TCES reduces narcotic requirements for early postoperative analgesia. This technique might have potential to facilitate early postoperative analgesia in patients undergoing elective abdominal surgery.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Oct 1996
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialA comparison of the neuromuscular blocking effects of atracurium, mivacurium, and vecuronium on the adductor pollicis and the orbicularis oculi muscle in humans.
Both the orbicularis oculi (OO) and the adductor pollicis (AP) muscles have been used to indirectly quantify the extent of neuromuscular block of the respiratory muscles. To clarify any differences in response of these muscles to neuromuscular blocking drugs, the effects of two different doses of atracurium, mivacurium, and vecuronium on the AP and OO were studied. A new technique was used to measure the evoked mechanical response of the OO with accelerometry. ⋯ TOF 0.7 was shorter with the smaller dose of each drug, but there was no difference with the higher doses. It is concluded that it is possible to record the mechanical response of the OO muscle using a noninvasive method. There are differences between the responses of the OO and the AP to neuromuscular blockers that depend upon both the specific drug itself and the dose used.