Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Dec 1996
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe safety and efficacy of oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate for preoperative sedation in young children.
Oral transmucosal fentanyl citrate (OTFC) is a labeled preoperative pediatric sedative. Doses greater than 15 micrograms/kg are associated with a high incidence of post-operative nausea and vomiting and occasional respiratory depression. We studied the safety and efficacy of OTFC in children 6 yr old and younger at a dose of 15 micrograms/kg. ⋯ One OTFC patient developed rigidity during induction. Emergence and recovery were not delayed by OTFC despite a 50% incidence of postoperative vomiting. We do not recommend the use of OTFC in a 15 micrograms/kg dose as a routine preoperative sedative in children 6 yr old and younger.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Dec 1996
Comparative StudyPreoperative anxiety and fear: a comparison of assessments by patients and anesthesia and surgery residents.
We sought to compare self-assessment of preoperative anxiety levels and selection of worst fears by surgical patients with the assessments made by the anesthesia and surgery residents providing intraoperative care for those patients. One hundred inpatients at a Veterans Affairs hospital (Group 1) and 45 patients at a University hospital (Group 2) were asked to complete a brief questionnaire; the residents were asked to complete the same questionnaire. Group 1 results showed that median patient visual analog scale (VAS) scores were lower for anxiety about anesthesia compared to surgery (16 vs 22, P < or = 0.05). ⋯ The fear chosen with the greatest frequency by Group 2 patients was "pain after the operation". Sixty percent of anesthesia residents matched their patients' fear choice (P < or = 0.001). This study indicates a variable ability of anesthesia and surgery residents to predict patient anxiety and fear which may be due, in part, to difficulty in understanding a Veterans Affairs hospital patient population.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Dec 1996
Comparative StudyThe effects of long-term prone positioning in patients with trauma-induced adult respiratory distress syndrome.
Prone positioning improves gas exchange in some patients with adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), but the effects of repeated, long-term prone positioning (20 h duration) have never been evaluated systemically. We therefore investigated 20 patients with ARDS after multiple trauma (Injury Severity Score [ISS] 27.3 +/- 10, ARDS score 2.84 +/- 0.42). Patients who fulfilled the entry criteria (bilateral diffuse infiltrates, severe hypoxemia, pulmonary artery occlusion pressure [PAOP] < 18 mm Hg, and PaO2/fraction of inspired oxygen [FIO2] < 200 mm Hg at inverse ratio ventilation with positive end-expiratory pressure [PEEP] > 8 mm Hg for more than 24 h) were turned to the prone position at noon and were turned back to the supine position at 8:00 AM on the next day. ⋯ Short periods in the supine position were necessary to allow for nursing care, medical evaluation, and interventions such as placement of central lines. No position-dependent changes of systemic hemodynamic variables were observed. We conclude that, in trauma patients with ARDS undergoing long-term positioning treatment, lung function improves significantly during prone position compared to short phases of conventional supine position during which the beneficial effects are partly lost.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Dec 1996
Comparative StudyDelayed time response of the continuous cardiac output pulmonary artery catheter.
Previous studies of the accuracy of pulmonary artery catheters (PAC) which provide continuous cardiac output (CCO) monitoring have investigated the performance during steady-state conditions. We compared the response time to hemodynamic change using a CCO PAC and an ultrasonic flow probe (UFP). In five sheep, a CCO PAC was inserted, and an UFP for measurement of CCO was placed around the pulmonary artery via a left thoracotomy. ⋯ The time interval for 80% change was 14.5 +/- 4.1 min for CCO versus 1.8 +/- 0.9 min with UFP. The current study demonstrates clinically important time delays in the response of the CCO catheter. This delay must be considered when rapid alterations of the hemodynamic state may occur.