Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialAttenuation of cardiovascular responses to tracheal extubation: comparison of verapamil, lidocaine, and verapamil-lidocaine combination.
We recently showed that verapamil attenuated hemodynamic responses to tracheal extubation. The aim of the current study was to compare the efficacy of a combination of intravenous (I.V.) verapamil (0.1 mg/kg) and I.V. lidocaine (1 mg/kg) with that of each drug alone in suppressing the cardiovascular changes during tracheal extubation and emergence from anesthesia. One hundred adult patients (ASA physical status I) who were to undergo elective minor surgery were randomly assigned to one of four groups (n = 25 each): Group S = saline plus saline (control), Group V = verapamil 0.1 mg/kg I.V. plus saline, Group L = lidocaine 1 mg/kg I.V. plus saline, and Group V-L = verapamil 0.1 mg/kg I.V. plus lidocaine 1 mg/kg I.V. These medications were given 2 min before tracheal extubation. Anesthesia was maintained with 1.0%-2.0% sevoflurane and 60% nitrous oxide (N2O) in oxygen. Muscle relaxation was achieved with vecuronium, and a residual neuromuscular blockade was reversed with neostigmine 0.05 mg/kg (combined with atropine 0.02 mg/kg). Changes in heart rate (HR) and arterial blood pressure (AP) were measured during and after tracheal extubation. In the control group, the HR and systolic and diastolic AP increased significantly during tracheal extubation. Verapamil, lidocaine, and their combination attenuated the increases in these variables. The beneficial effect was the greatest with the combination of verapamil and lidocaine. These findings suggest that verapamil 0.1 mg/kg and lidocaine 1 mg/kg given I.V. concomitantly 2 min before tracheal extubation is a simple and more effective prophylaxis than verapamil or lidocaine alone for attenuating the cardiovascular changes associated with tracheal extubation. ⋯ Tachycardia and hypertension associated with tracheal extubation, which may lead to myocardial ischemia, represent a potential risk for patients with coronary arterial disease. To seek effective pharmacological prophylaxis against these complications, we compared the attenuation of hemodynamic changes among verapamil, lidocaine, and a verapamil/lidocaine combination using ASA physical status I patients and found the combination to be effective.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialThe effects of inhaled nitric oxide and its combination with intravenous almitrine on Pao2 during one-lung ventilation in patients undergoing thoracoscopic procedures.
The aim of this study was to assess whether hypoxemia during one-lung ventilation (OLV) can be prevented by inhaled nitric oxide (NO) (Part I) or by its combination with intravenous (IV) almitrine (Part II) in 40 patients undergoing thoracoscopic procedures. In Part I, 20 patients were divided into two groups: one received O2 (Group 1) and one received O2/NO (Group 2). In Part II, 20 patients were divided into two groups: one received O2 (Group 3) and one received O2/NO/almitrine (Group 4). In Groups 2 and 4, NO (20 ppm) was administered during the entire period of OLV, and almitrine was continuously infused (16 microg x kg(-1) x min[-1]) in Group 4. Arterial blood gases were measured during two-lung ventilation with patients in the supine position, after positioning in the lateral decubitus position, and then every 5 min for a 30-min period during OLV. During OLV, Pao2 values decreased similarly in Groups 1 and 2. After 30 min of OLV, the mean Pao2 values in Groups 1 and 2 were 132 +/- 14 mm Hg (mean +/- sem) and 149 +/- 27 mm Hg (not significant [NS]), and the Pao2 value was less than 100 mm Hg in four patients in Group 1 and five patients in Group 2. Pao2 values were greater in Group 4 than in Group 3 after 15 and 30 min of OLV. After 30 min of OLV, the mean Pao2 values were 146 +/- 16 mm Hg in Group 3 and 408 +/- 33 mm Hg in Group 4 (P < 0.001). Pao2 was less than 100 mm Hg during OLV (NS) in four patients in Group 3 and in no patient in Group 4. We conclude that NO inhalation alone has no effect on Pao2 evolution during OLV, although its combination with IV almitrine limits the decrease of Pao2 during OLV. This beneficial effect of NO/almitrine could be attributed to an improvement in ventilation-perfusion relationships. ⋯ Decrease in oxygenation during one-lung ventilation is quite common. Our study showed that inhaled nitric oxide alone did not influence Pao2 evolution. We then tried adding intravenous almitrine to nitric oxide with amazingly good results on Pao2. This nonventilatory technique should be of great use during special thoracic acts, such as thoracoscopic procedures.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 1997
Is epidural anesthesia in labor associated with chronic low back pain? A prospective cohort study.
The association between epidural anesthesia during labor and subsequent postpartum low back pain remains unclear. The objective of this follow-up cohort study was to determine whether epidural anesthesia was associated with chronic back pain 1 yr after delivery. We contacted 329 women by telephone and asked them to complete a standardized questionnaire 1 yr (+/-1 mo) after delivery. One hundred sixty-four women had received epidural analgesia for labor and delivery, and 165 had not. Subjects were asked to quantify their back pain (yes/no, numeric rating score, and interference with daily activities). Differences between the two groups were tested by using the chi2 test and the Mann-Whitney U-test, and logistic regression was used to control for confounding variables. The response rate was 244 of 329 (74%). Responders and nonresponders were similar in their demographic and clinical characteristics. There was no difference in the prevalence of back pain between women who had received epidural anesthesia (12 of 121, 10%) and those who had not (17 of 123, 14%). The adjusted relative risk of low back pain at 1 yr (epidural versus nonepidural) was 0.63 (95% confidence interval 0.25, 1.56). There were also no differences between the two groups on numeric rating scores or level of interference with activities. This prospective follow-up study demonstrated no association between epidural anesthesia for labor and delivery and chronic back pain 1 yr after delivery. ⋯ We evaluated the presence of low back pain 1 yr after delivery in two groups of women-those who chose epidural analgesia for labor and those who did not. There was no increased risk of back pain in women who had used epidural analgesia. This finding is consistent with those of other North American studies.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 1997
Clinical TrialThe effect of age on retrieval of local anesthetic solution from the epidural space.
We conducted this prospective study to determine whether advancing age is correlated with retrieval of local anesthetic solution from the epidural space. Three hundred forty-six patients (ASA physical status I or II, 20-93 yrs of age, 177 female and 169 male patients) undergoing epidural anesthesia were enrolled. The epidural space was identified by a loss of resistance technique using air, and a catheter was introduced 3 cm. Three milliliters of 2% lidocaine with epinephrine was injected as a study dose by hand at a rate of 1 mL/s with the patient in the supine position. The syringe was immediately aspirated to retrieve the local anesthetic solution. A retrieved volume of 0.5 mL or more with a glucose concentration less than 6 mg/dL was defined as retrieval positive, and a volume of less than 0.5 mL was defined as retrieval negative. There was a significant correlation between age and retrieval volume among all the patients (Y = 0.008X-0.222, P < 0.0001) with a significant increase in the positive retrieval incidence and volume from the patients in their 50s (11%, 0.6 +/- 0.3 mL) to the patients in their 60s (26%, 1.0 +/- 0.6 mL) (P < 0.05 for both). The incidence of positive retrieval and the retrieval volume were greater in the patients in their 60s and older (30%, 1.1 +/- 0.63 mL) than in the younger than 60 (10%, 0.6 +/- 0.3 mL) (P < 0.0001 and P < 0.001). The glucose concentration was 2.3 +/- 1.2 mg/dL in the positive cases. We conclude that there is a weak positive correlation between age and the local anesthetic solution retrieved from the epidural space. ⋯ We conducted a study in 346 patients to determine whether advancing age could be correlated with retrieval of local anesthetic solution from the epidural space. We found a weak positive correlation between advanced age and the amount of solution retrievable from the epidural space. Further studies are required to determine whether this phenomenon may call for dose adjustments in patients aged more than 60 yrs.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 1997
Clinical TrialPostoperative pharmacokinetics and sympatholytic effects of dexmedetomidine.
Dexmedetomidine is a selective alpha2-adrenoceptor agonist with centrally mediated sympatholytic, sedative, and analgesic effects. This study evaluated: 1) pharmacokinetics of dexmedetomidine in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) in surgical patients; 2) precision of a computer-controlled infusion protocol (CCIP) for dexmedetomidine during the immediate postoperative period; and 3) dexmedetomidine's sympatholytic effects during that period. Dexmedetomidine was infused postoperatively by CCIP for 60 min to eight women, targeting a plasma concentration (Cp) of 600 pg/mL. Before, during, and after infusion, blood was sampled to determine plasma concentrations of norepinephrine, epinephrine, and dexmedetomidine, and CSF was sampled to determine dexmedetomidine concentrations (C[CSF]). Heart rate and arterial blood pressure were measured continuously from 5 min before until 3 h after the end of infusion. During the infusion, Cp values generally exceeded the target value: median percent error averaged 21% and ranged from -2% to 74%; median absolute percent error averaged 23% and ranged from 4% to 74%. After infusion, C(CSF) was 4% +/- 1% of Cp. Because C(CSF) barely exceeded the assay's limit of quantitation, CSF pharmacokinetics were not determined. During the infusion, norepinephrine decreased from 2.1 +/- 0.8 to 0.7 +/- 0.3 nmol/L; epinephrine decreased from 0.7 +/- 0.5 to 0.2 +/- 0.2 nmol/L; heart rate decreased from 76 +/- 15 to 64 +/- 11 bpm; and systolic blood pressure decreased from 158 +/- 23 to 140 +/- 23 mm Hg. We conclude that infusion of dexmedetomidine by CCIP using published pharmacokinetic parameters overshoots target dexmedetomidine concentrations during the early postoperative period. Hemodynamic and catecholamine results suggest that dexmedetomidine attenuates sympathetic activity during the immediate postoperative period. ⋯ We studied the pharmacokinetic and sympatholytic effects of dexmedetomidine during the immediate postoperative period and found that during this period, the published pharmacokinetic data slightly overshoot target plasma dexmedetomidine concentrations. We also found that heart rate, blood pressure, and plasma catecholamine concentrations decrease during dexmedetomidine infusion.