Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical TrialA randomized, blind comparison of remifentanil and alfentanil during anesthesia for outpatient surgery.
We compared remifentanil, an esterase-metabolized opioid, with alfentanil as part of balanced anesthesia with at least 0.8% isoflurane during outpatient surgery in a randomized, double-blind trial. One hundred two patients received remifentanil, and 99 patients received alfentanil. Patients who received remifentanil experienced significantly fewer stress responses to surgical stimuli (52.9% and 65.7%, P < 0.05); significantly fewer remifentanil patients responded to skin closure (11% and 22%, P < 0.05) than patients who received alfentanil. Significantly more patients in the alfentanil group required extra analgesia compared with the remifentanil group (P < 0.05). Time to respond to verbal command was shorter for alfentanil than remifentanil (median 7 min vs 9 min), and times to spontaneous respiration (median 5 min vs 8 min), adequate respiratory rate (median 6 min vs 9 min), and tracheal extubation (median 6 min vs 9 min) were significantly shorter for alfentanil in comparison with remifentanil (P < 0.05). Remifentanil patients, however, showed significantly better recovery of psychomotor and psychometric function between 30 and 90 min after surgery (P < 0.05). The incidences of hypotension intraoperatively and shivering postoperatively were significantly higher with remifentanil. No unexpected or serious adverse events were recorded with remifentanil; however, one patient who received alfentanil experienced severe recurrent respiratory depression after surgery. The metabolic profile of remifentanil allowed better intraoperative analgesia without compromising recovery. ⋯ The pharmacological profile of remifentanil, a new opioid for use in anesthesia, suggests that rapid recovery will occur after its use. This study of 200 outpatients shows that the differences suggested from kinetic studies are not always borne out in clinical practice, although later recovery variables did, in fact, favor remifentanil.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialTranexamic acid is effective in decreasing postoperative bleeding and transfusions in primary coronary artery bypass operations: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial.
We evaluated the effects of tranexamic acid (TA) administered before and after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) in a prospective, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of adult patients undergoing primary coronary artery bypass grafting surgery. Patients received placebo (n = 30) or TA 15 mg/kg before CPB, followed by a TA infusion of 1 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1) for 5 h (n = 30) or TA 15 mg/kg after CPB, followed by a TA infusion of 1 mg x kg(-1) x h(-1) for 5 h (n = 30). Demographic, medical, surgical, laboratory, mediastinal chest tube drainage (MCTD), hemoglobin loss, transfusion, and outcome data were collected. Allogenic blood product administration was tightly controlled. The demographic, medical, and surgical characteristics were similar in all three groups. The median postoperative MCTD and hemoglobin loss in the pre-CPB TA group (710 mL, 8.6 g) was significantly less (P < 0.001) compared with the control (1202 mL, 44.2 g) and post-CPB TA groups (1020 mL, 23.4 g). The percentage of patients who received no allogenic blood products was 27% for the pre-CPB TA group and 33% for the post-CPB TA group (not significant). These percentages were significantly lower than those in the placebo group (66%, P < 0.001). The median number of allogenic blood products administered to the pre-CPB TA group (0 units) was significantly less compared with the control group (4.5 units). The thromboelastogram and fibrinogen split product levels in the pre-CPB TA group indicated better platelet function and less activation of the fibrinolytic system compared with the other two groups (P < 0.05). There were no intergroup differences in reoperation, myocardial infarction, stroke, infections, or death. These data support the use of pre-CPB TA to decrease patient exposure to postcardiopulmonary bypass allogenic blood products. ⋯ In this randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we investigated the efficacy of tranexamic acid to decrease bleeding and blood transfusions after open-heart operations. Tranexamic acid administered before and during the operation was effective in decreasing both bleeding and transfusions. When tranexamic acid was administered immediately after the operation, it had a minor beneficial effect.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialA comparative efficacy study of hyperbaric 5% lidocaine and 1.5% lidocaine for spinal anesthesia.
We compared the clinical efficacy of 1.5% lidocaine in dextrose 7.5% in water, which is currently available as a commercial preparation but approved for use only in obstetrical patients, with the traditional 5% lidocaine in dextrose 7.5% in water for spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing lower abdominal procedures. Fifty-one male patients scheduled to undergo inguinal herniorrhaphy were randomly divided into two groups based on the spinal anesthetic received: Group I received 1.5% lidocaine in dextrose 7.5% in water, and Group II received 5% lidocaine in dextrose 7.5% in water. After intrathecal injection of the anesthetic, each patient was evaluated for the speed of onset, the time to recovery, and the quality of the surgical anesthesia and motor block that ensued by an anesthesiologist blinded to the technique. With the exception of the patients in Group I, who achieved a higher dermatome level of sensory analgesia, we were unable to demonstrate any significant clinical differences between the two lidocaine solutions. Our results indicate that lidocaine 1.5% in dextrose 7.5% in water is clinically indistinguishable from the 5% solution as a spinal anesthetic for lower abdominal surgery. ⋯ In this study, two concentrations of lidocaine are compared as spinal anesthetics in 51 male patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair. Patients were assessed for the onset, quality, and duration of the spinal block. The study results indicate that 1.5% lidocaine is as effective as the 5% solution as a spinal anesthetic for patients undergoing inguinal hernia repair.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialMyocardial ischemia and adverse cardiac outcomes in cardiac patients undergoing noncardiac surgery with sevoflurane and isoflurane. Sevoflurane Ischemia Study Group.
Sevoflurane is associated with less tachycardia and coronary vasodilation than isoflurane and thus might be associated with less myocardial ischemia. This multicenter study examined the incidence of myocardial ischemia and adverse cardiac outcomes in adults (40-87 yr) with cardiac disease having elective noncardiac surgery. Patients were randomized to receive either sevoflurane (S) (n = 106) or isoflurane (I) (n = 108) in conjunction with sodium thiopental, vecuronium, fentanyl, and 50%-70% N2O. Intraoperative hemodynamics were maintained within 20% of awake baseline with standard drugs. A Holter monitor was applied 3-24 h before surgery and maintained until 48 h after surgery. Electrocardiograms and blood samples for analysis of the MB isoenzyme fraction of creatine phosphokinase were obtained preoperatively and daily for 48 h postoperatively. Anesthetic exposure (1.79 +/- 0.15 [mean +/- SE] minimum alveolar concentration-hour) and duration of surgery (219 +/- 13 min) did not differ between groups. The incidence of ischemia in the pre-, intra- and postoperative periods, adverse cardiac outcomes (18% occurrence), intraoperative hemodynamic variations (+/-20% change from ward baseline), and administration of adjunct cardiovascular medications were similar between groups. In cardiac patients having noncardiac surgery, sevoflurane was comparable to isoflurane with respect to the incidence of intra- and postoperative myocardial ischemia and in the frequency of adverse cardiac outcomes. ⋯ Surgical patients with heart disease are at risk of heart complications, some of which could be induced by an anesthetic. We compared the incidence of cardiac complications between patients receiving sevoflurane and isoflurane. We found that the frequency of additional heart problems in cardiac patients receiving sevoflurane was not different from that associated with isoflurane.