Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Apr 1997
Nalbuphine coadministered with morphine prevents tolerance and dependence.
Nalbuphine, an opioid mixed agonist-antagonist, prevents many morphine-related side effects. In this study, we compared the effects of nalbuphine versus naloxone on the prevention of morphine tolerance and dependence in Sprague-Dawley rats. Group 1 received a morphine 5 mg/kg intraperitoneal (I. ⋯ P.). We found that coadministration of nalbuphine or naloxone with morphine dose-dependently blocked the development of morphine tolerance and dependence. However, unlike naloxone, nalbuphine did not attenuate the antinociceptive effect of morphine.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Apr 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe use of 0.25% lidocaine with fentanyl and pancuronium for intravenous regional anesthesia.
The present study was designed to assess the efficacy of fentanyl and pancuronium combined with dilute lidocaine solution for intravenous regional anesthesia of the arm. Forty adult patients undergoing upper limb surgery were randomly allocated to receive either 0.6 mL/kg of 0.5% lidocaine (3 mg/kg) or 0.6 mL/kg of 0.25% lidocaine (1.5 mg/kg) with 1 microg/kg of fentanyl and 0.5 mg of pancuronium. The onset of sensory and motor blocks was significantly shorter in the 0.5% lidocaine group (P < 0.05). ⋯ One patient in the 0.25% lidocaine group experienced a transient diplopia after tourniquet release. Postoperative analgesia time was similar in the two groups. We conclude that the addition of fentanyl plus pancuronium to the lidocaine solution reduces the dose of the local anesthetic and possibly systemic toxicity.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Apr 1997
Cerebral oxygen saturation and blood flow during liver transplantation.
After reperfusion of a liver graft, transcranial Doppler determined middle cerebral artery flow velocity, increases more than expected from the arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO2). We evaluated if this indication of cerebral hyperperfusion is reflected in the jugular oxygen saturation (SjO2) (n = 31) and oxygen saturation (ScO2) (near-infrared spectrophotometry, n = 22). From the dissection phase to the anhepatic phase SjO2 71.0% (range 62.3%-78.5%), ScO2 70% (range 65%-77%), and PaCO2 34.9 mm Hg (range 30.8-38.3) remained statistically unchanged. ⋯ Notably, SjO2 also increased at reperfusion from 71.6% (66.5%-78.0% mm Hg) to 80.0% (76.8%-84.8%) in the four patients in whom PaCO2 decreased at reperfusion from 37.6 mm Hg (36.8-39.5) to 34.0 mm Hg (32.3-36.8). If the changes in SjO2 after reperfusion of the grafted liver should be explained as a reflection of changes in cerebral blood flow, in response to PaCO2, it would indicate a highly accentuated CO2 reactivity of 13%/mm Hg. The results support that cerebral blood flow and, in turn, oxygenation increase after reperfusion because the grafted liver liberates a vasodilating substance(s).
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Apr 1997
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialMorphine patient-controlled analgesia is superior to meperidine patient-controlled analgesia for postoperative pain.
The choice between morphine and meperidine for postoperative pain is usually based on the preference of the prescriber, as few objective comparative data are available. This blind, randomized study compared the efficacy and side effects of morphine and meperidine administered by patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) for postoperative pain. One hundred two consenting patients scheduled for major abdominal surgery were randomly assigned to receive PCA with morphine (0.75, 1.0, or 1.5 mg bolus dose size) or meperidine (9, 12, or 18 mg) for pain control. ⋯ Meperidine use was associated with poorer performance in the trailmaking tests and a greater incidence of dryness of the mouth. Severity of nausea, mood, and incidence of unusual dreams did not differ significantly between drugs. We conclude that meperidine should be reserved for those patients in whom morphine is judged inappropriate.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Apr 1997
Do not resuscitate orders in the perioperative period: patient perspectives.
The purpose of this study was to determine the perspectives and opinions of terminally ill patients regarding the management of their do not resuscitate (DNR) orders in the perioperative period. Eighteen patients who had DNR orders and were willing to discuss those orders and their intentions were identified by hospital nurses or hospice workers. An in-depth interview was conducted with each patient. ⋯ Others were satisfied with discussing the intent of their orders. For various reasons and for various procedures, many patients with DNR orders are willing to undergo anesthesia and surgery. Anesthesiologists' awareness of the variety of opinions and perspectives held by patients regarding their DNR orders will enhance their preoperative discussion.