Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jul 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialClonidine added to the anesthetic solution enhances analgesia and improves oxygenation after intercostal nerve block for thoracotomy.
We evaluated the effect of adding clonidine to bupivacaine on postoperative pain control and oxygenation after intercostal nerve blockade (ICB) for thoracotomy, and attempted to distinguish a systemic from a local effect of clonidine. ICB with 2 mg/kg 0.5% bupivacaine was performed in 36 patients undergoing thoracotomy. Patients were randomized to one of three groups: 1) a control group that received bupivacaine with saline for ICB and an IM injection of saline, 2) an IM group that received bupivacaine with saline for ICB and an IM injection of 2 micrograms/kg clonidine, and 3) a block group that received bupivacaine with 2 micrograms/kg clonidine for ICB and an IM injection of saline. Blood gases, visual analog scale (VAS) scores, and analgesic demand were determined hourly for 8 h after arrival in the postoperative care unit (PCU). Patients in the block group had significantly lower VAS scores, higher arterial oxygen tension, and lower analgesic demand for the first 4 h in the PCU, compared with the two other groups. No difference was noted thereafter. We conclude that the addition of clonidine to bupivacaine for ICB leads to a short-term effect enhancing postoperative pain control and improving arterial oxygenation, probably mediated by a direct effect on the nerves. ⋯ Severe pain after thoracotomy can lead to impaired ventilation. We studied the effect of adding clonidine to bupivacaine for intercostal nerve blockade after thoracotomy. Clonidine administered directly on the nerves enhanced analgesia and improved oxygenation for a short time compared with systemic administration or control.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jul 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe effect of clonidine or midazolam premedication on perioperative responses during ketamine anesthesia.
The use of ketamine as a sole anesthetic induces marked central sympathetic stimulation, causing increased heart rate, blood pressure (BP), and oxygen consumption (VO2). Both alpha 2-agonists and benzodiazepines have been used to attenuate these potentially harmful ketamine-induced responses. This double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study was designed to compare the perioperative metabolic, hemodynamic, and sympathoadrenal responses to IM clonidine (2 micrograms/kg) and midazolam (70 micrograms/kg) premedication during ketamine anesthesia. VO2 was measured continuously using indirect calorimetry in 30 ASA physical status I patients. The patients received ketamine, mivacurium, and fentanyl for the induction of anesthesia. Anesthesia was maintained using a ketamine infusion and fentanyl boluses i.v. Preoperatively, both VO2 and BP decreased significantly after the administration clonidine and midazolam compared with placebo (P < 0.01). Intraoperatively, VO2 was higher in the midazolam group than in the placebo and clonidine groups (P < 0.05). Postoperatively, there were no significant differences in BP and VO2, although they stayed at lower level in the clonidine group during the whole postoperative period. Clonidine decreased pre- and postoperative plasma catecholamine concentrations (P < 0.05). Our results indicate that a midazolam-ketamine combination may induce potentially harmful metabolic stimulation, whereas the sympatholytic effects of clonidine on ketamine-anesthetized patients may be beneficial, as perioperative VO2 was decreased. ⋯ Ketamine causes sympathetic stimulation with an ensuing increase in oxygen consumption. Anticipating that clonidine might attenuate this response, we measured oxygen consumption in patients undergoing surgery during ketamine anesthesia. Patients treated with a clonidine-ketamine combination had lower intra- and postoperative oxygen consumption than those treated with a midazolam-ketamine combination.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jul 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialPreemptive caudal bupivacaine and morphine for postoperative analgesia in children.
We designed this double-blind study to evaluate the efficacy of preemptive epidural bupivacaine and small-dose morphine for postoperative analgesia in children after herniorraphy. Sixty children, ASA physical status I or II, who were undergoing elective hernia repair under general anesthesia were randomly allocated into two groups. Group I (preemptive group) received 0.66 mL/kg 0.25% bupivacaine with morphine 0.02 mg/kg caudally after the induction of anesthesia but 15 min before surgery. Group II (postincisional group) received the same drug mixture after surgery. Pain was assessed using an objective pain scale (OPS). Time to first postoperative analgesics (TFA), the number of supplementary analgesic used, and the amount of morphine consumed over the ensuing 24-h period were noted. The OPS score was significantly less in Group I at 0.5, 4, and 8 h (P < 0.05) than in Group II after surgery. The median OPS score recorded over 24 h was 0 for Group I and 2 for Group II, which was significantly different (P < 0.05). The TFA in Group I (12.55 +/- 3.06 h) was significantly (P < 0.05) prolonged compared with Group II (10.62 +/- 3.18 h). The total postoperative morphine consumption in Group I (2.24 +/- 1.4 mg) was significantly (P < 0.05) less than that in Group II (3.34 +/- 2.29 mg). Nevertheless, the incidence of nausea and vomiting was not significantly different between the groups. In this study, we demonstrated that preemptive epidural bupivacaine and small-dose morphine administration is superior to the same mixture given at the conclusion of surgery for pain relief. ⋯ This study was performed on two groups of 30 children undergoing hernia repair. Group I received a bupivacaine-morphine mixture caudally before surgery, and Group II received the same drugs caudally at the completion of surgery. Postoperative assessment demonstrated longer and better pain relief in Group I.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jul 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialThe placement of the cuffed oropharyngeal airway with sevoflurane in adults: a comparison with the laryngeal mask airway.
We sought to determine the anesthetic duration of sevoflurane required to achieve good conditions for placement of a cuffed oropharyngeal airway (COPA) or a laryngeal mask airway (LMA). Forty adult ASA physical status I or II patients presenting for elective surgery received single-breath vital capacity inhaled induction with 5% sevoflurane via face mask; thereafter, ventilation was manually assisted. The patients were randomized to receive either a COPA or LMA placement. The time of anesthetic exposure was varied for consecutive patients using the staircase method. The mean (95% confidence interval) anesthetic time required for acceptable COPA placement (100 [55-145] s) was significantly shorter than that for LMA (160 [101-219] s). The 50% and 95% effective doses (from logistic analyses) for acceptable conditions associated with COPA or LMA placement were 90 s and 145 s or 164 s and 261 s, respectively. These findings suggest that COPA insertion is less stimulating than the LMA. ⋯ The cuffed oropharyngeal airway is a new airway device that is similar to a laryngeal mask airway in many ways. However, it requires shorter anesthetic duration for successful placement, which suggests that it can be placed with less stimulation. It may be an alternative to a laryngeal mask airway.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jul 1998
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialWarming intravenous fluids reduces perioperative hypothermia in women undergoing ambulatory gynecological surgery.
We evaluated whether warming i.v. fluids resulted in less hypothermia (core temperature < 35.5 degrees C) compared with room-temperature fluids. Thirty-eight adult outpatients undergoing elective gynecological surgery of > 30 min were randomized to two groups: fluid warming at 42 degrees C or control (room temperature fluids at approximately 21 degrees C). All patients received general anesthesia with isoflurane, tracheal intubation, standard operating room blankets and surgical drapes, and passive humidification of inspired gases. Tympanic membrane (core) temperatures were measured at baseline and at 15-min intervals after induction. The incidence of shivering and postoperative requirement for meperidine and/or radiant heat were evaluated. Core temperatures were lower in the control compared with the warm fluid group at the end of surgery (35.6 +/- 0.1 degrees C vs 36.2 +/- 0.1 degrees C; P < 0.05). More patients had final core temperature < 35.5 degrees C in the control compared with the warm fluid group (35% vs 0%; P < 0.05). There were no differences in time to discharge from the postanesthesia care unit or the incidence of shivering between the groups. We conclude that fluid warming, in conjunction with standard heat conservation measures, was effective in maintaining normothermia during outpatient gynecological surgery; however, there was no improvement in patient outcome. ⋯ Women who received i.v. fluid at body temperature had significantly higher core temperatures during and after outpatient gynecological surgery compared with women who received i.v. fluids at the temperature of the operating room.