Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jun 1999
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialAdding clonidine to lidocaine for intravenous regional anesthesia prevents tourniquet pain.
Tourniquet pain often complicates the use of the pneumatic tourniquet during surgical procedures performed under IV regional anesthesia. Clonidine-containing local anesthetic solutions have better analgesic properties than plain solutions when used for spinal, epidural, or peripheral blocks. We tested the hypothesis that the addition of clonidine may improve the quality of IV regional anesthesia, especially tourniquet tolerance. Forty patients were allocated randomly in a double-blinded, randomized study to receive 40 mL of 0.5% lidocaine and either 1 mL of isotonic saline or clonidine (150 microg). A double-cuffed tourniquet was kept inflated until patients complained of pain, leading to release of the distal cuff. Pain at the tourniquet site, at the surgical site, and in the distal part of the arm was rated on a visual analog scale (VAS) and a verbal rating scale (VRS) every 15 min during tourniquet placement and every 15 min for 1 h after tourniquet deflation. Motor blockade, sedation, arterial pressure, and heart rate were also recorded. VAS and VRS scores were significantly lower in the clonidine group 30 and 45 min after tourniquet inflation. The tolerance for the distal tourniquet was also significantly longer in the clonidine group (median [range]: 22 [10-40] vs 10 [5-20] min; P < 0.05); motor blockade was comparable between the two groups. Pain was not different in the two groups after tourniquet release. The clonidine group experienced a higher degree of sedation. We conclude that clonidine improves tourniquet tolerance when added to a local anesthetic solution. ⋯ A 150-microg dose of clonidine added to lidocaine improved tourniquet tolerance during IV regional anesthesia.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jun 1999
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialEpidural ropivacaine for the initiation of labor epidural analgesia: a dose finding study.
The purpose of our study was to determine the lowest concentration of ropivacaine that offers pain relief for the initiation of labor epidural analgesia. Women in active labor were enrolled in this prospective, randomized, double-blinded study to receive either ropivacaine 0.20% (Group I), ropivacaine 0.15% (Group II), or ropivacaine 0.10% (Group III). After placement of the epidural catheter, 13 mL of the study medication was administered. Fifteen minutes later, the adequacy of analgesia was assessed. If the woman reported that her degree of analgesia was not adequate, an additional 5 mL of the study medication was given, the degree of pain relief was reassessed 15 min later, and the study was concluded. A sequential study design was used to assess the success rates. We found that 26 of 28 (93%) women in Group I had adequate analgesia, compared with only 18 of 28 (64%) in Group II (P = 0.014) and 4 of 12 (33%) in Group III (P = 0.003). We conclude that ropivacaine 0.20% offers adequate analgesia significantly more often than either ropivacaine 0.15% or ropivacaine 0.10%. If one selects ropivacaine as the sole local anesthetic for the initiation of labor epidural analgesia, the minimal concentration should be 0.20%. ⋯ The lowest effective concentration of ropivacaine for the initiation of labor epidural analgesia has not been determined. We found that ropivacaine 0.20% offers adequate analgesia significantly more often than either ropivacaine 0.15% or ropivacaine 0.10%. If one selects ropivacaine as the sole local anesthetic for the initiation of labor epidural analgesia, the minimal concentration should be 0.20%.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jun 1999
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialMucosal pressure, mechanism of seal, airway sealing pressure, and anatomic position for the disposable versus reusable laryngeal mask airways.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jun 1999
The age-related effects of epidural lidocaine, with and without epinephrine, on spinal cord blood flow in anesthetized rabbits.
The effect of epidural or spinal epinephrine when added to local anesthetics on spinal cord blood flow (SCBF)are controversial. We evaluated the effects of epidural lidocaine, with or without epinephrine, on spinal cord blood flow in young and adult rabbits receiving 2% plain lidocaine, 2% lidocaine with epinephrine (1:200,000), or saline epidurally. Colored microspheres were injected through the left ventricle 10 min before and 7.5 and 30 min after epidural injection. The organs (brain, heart, kidneys, and the L6-7 segment of the spinal cord) were analyzed for regional blood flow determination. A significant decrease in mean arterial pressure was observed after the administration of lidocaine, with or without epinephrine, in both adult and young animals compared with saline. SCBF did not change over time in adult rabbits. Conversely, a significant decrease in SCBF was observed in the two groups of young rabbits receiving lidocaine. This decrease correlated with the decrease in mean arterial pressure but did not correlate with the use of epinephrine. We conclude that any reduction in blood pressure occurring in pediatric patients receiving a combined epidural-general anesthetic may result in decreased SCBF. ⋯ In young rabbits, any decrease in blood pressure was followed by a decrease in spinal cord blood flow, a decrease that did not correlate to the use of epinephrine and was not observed in adult animals. These data suggest that blood pressure should be monitored closely to promptly treat any decrease in blood pressure when combined epidural-general anesthesia is used in children.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jun 1999
Patients with malignant osteopetrosis are at high risk of anesthetic morbidity and mortality.
The anesthetic literature contains no focused discussion of the perioperative management and risks of children with malignant autosomal recessive osteopetrosis (osteopetrosis). We retrospectively analyzed the perioperative morbidity and mortality rates encountered in the anesthetic management of children with osteopetrosis. We compared the perioperative mortality rate for this patient population with that for other pediatric patients in our institution and that reported in the literature for children and other high-risk patients. We also investigated the inability to intubate the tracheas of children with osteopetrosis compared with other pediatric patients in our institution. Using Fisher's exact test, patients with osteopetrosis were found to have a higher likelihood of perioperative mortality compared with other children or all ASA physical status III, but not ASA physical status IV, patients (P < 0.05). Finally, we discovered that children with osteopetrosis were more likely to have tracheas that could not be intubated than other pediatric patients in our institution. We conclude that children with osteopetrosis are at risk of adverse respiratory events and mortality associated with these adverse events. ⋯ Osteopetrosis is a rare disease that increases perioperative morbidity and mortality. By performing a retrospective chart review, we found that this increased perioperative morbidity and mortality is primarily related to airway and respiratory factors. Anesthetic management strategies should consider the factors that cause the high frequency of adverse airway events in this patient population.