Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Aug 1999
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical TrialThe effects of rapacuronium on histamine release and hemodynamics in adult patients undergoing general anesthesia.
Neuromuscular blocking drugs may have variable effects on heart rate (HR) and blood pressure. Rapacuronium is a rapid-acting, steroidal-derived neuromuscular blocking drug whose hemodynamic effects have not been characterized. We studied the effects of 1, 2, and 3 mg/kg rapacuronium on histamine release, HR, and blood pressure in 47 ASA physical status II or III adult patients after the induction of anesthesia with etomidate/fentanyl/N2O. Plasma histamine concentrations were measured before induction and immediately before and 1, 3, and 5 min after the rapid administration of rapacuronium. Mean arterial pressure (MAP) decreased after rapacuronium administration, but there were no significant differences among the groups for changes in HR or MAP, and there was no correlation between changes in MAP or HR and increases in histamine levels. There were no changes in HR or MAP among five patients who had significant (> or = 1 ng/mL) increases in histamine from baselin. Seven patients had bronchospasm without increases in plasma histamine levels. Rapacuronium 2-3 mg/kg increased plasma histamine levels. However, clinically significant histamine-related sequelae did not occur in this population with 1- to 3-mg/kg doses of rapacuronium, and cardiovascular changes were not directly correlated with histamine release. Rapacuronium administration can produce hypotension via mechanisms that do not seem to be related to histamine release. ⋯ Rapacuronium, a new steroidal-derived muscle relaxant, may release histamine and produce slight changes in blood pressure and heart rate after administration.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Aug 1999
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialComparison of ramosetron and granisetron for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting after gynecologic surgery.
In a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study, we evaluated the efficacy of granisetron and ramosetron for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in major gynecologic surgery. One hundred twenty patients, ASA physical status I or II, aged 23-65 yr, received i.v. granisetron 2.5 mg or ramosetron 0.3 mg (n = 60 each) at the end of surgery. A standard general anesthetic technique and postoperative analgesia were used. The incidence of a complete response, defined as no PONV and no need for another rescue medication, 0-3 h after anesthesia was 87% with granisetron and 90% with ramosetron; the corresponding incidence 3-24 h after anesthesia was 85% and 90%; the corresponding incidence 24-48 h after anesthesia was 70% and 92% (P < 0.05). No clinically serious adverse events due to the drugs were observed in any of the groups. In conclusion, prophylactic therapy with ramosetron is more effective than granisetron for the longterm prevention of PONV after major gynecologic surgery. ⋯ We compared the efficacy of granisetron and ramosetron for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in major gynecologic surgery. Prophylactic therapy with ramosetron was more effective than granisetron for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting 24-48 h after anesthesia.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Aug 1999
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialPropofol versus propofol-ketamine sedation for retrobulbar nerve block: comparison of sedation quality, intraocular pressure changes, and recovery profiles.
We compared sedation quality, intraocular pressure (IOP) changes, and recovery profiles in patients who received propofol or propofol-ketamine sedation during placement of the retrobulbar nerve block (RBB). Seventy elderly patients undergoing cataract extraction according to a prospective, randomized, double-blinded protocol were preoperatively evaluated with a Mini-Mental State examination and baseline IOP. A hypnotic dose was provided with either propofol (Group P) or a propofol-ketamine (Group PK) combination. The IOP measurement was repeated, and the surgeon initiated the RBB. Supplemental study drug was given if needed. The level of sedation was considered acceptable if the patient exhibited minimal or no movement and grimacing with needle insertion. Patients were evaluated in terms of quality of sedation, cardiopulmonary stability, and recovery profile. Compared with patients in Group P, patients in Group PK had a significantly faster onset of acceptable sedation (Group P 235 +/- 137 s versus Group PK 164 +/- 67 s) and required significantly less supplemental sedation (Group P 1.1 +/- 1.9 mL versus Group PK 0.15 +/- 0.3 mL). Additionally, none of the Group PK patients required ventilatory assistance, but two patients in Group P required assisted mask ventilation. In conclusion, the addition of ketamine (13.2 +/- 3.3 mg) to propofol (44 +/- 11 mg) decreased the hypnotic requirement and improved the quality of sedation without prolonging recovery. ⋯ Anesthesiologists frequently perform retrobulbar blocks while simultaneously providing sedation. Using ketamine to supplement propofol sedation provided a faster onset and improved the quality of sedation during the retrobulbar block procedure.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Aug 1999
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialEarly and late reversal of rocuronium and vecuronium with neostigmine in adults and children.
We investigated the influence of the timing of neostigmine administration on recovery from rocuronium or vecuronium neuromuscular blockade. Eighty adults and 80 children were randomized to receive 0.45 mg/kg rocuronium or 0.075 mg/kg vecuronium during propofol/fentanyl/N2O anesthesia. Neuromuscular blockade was monitored by train-of-four (TOF) stimulation and adductor pollicis electromyography. Further randomization was made to control (no neostigmine) or reversal with 0.07 mg/kg neostigmine/0.01 mg/kg glycopyrrolate given 5 min after relaxant, or first twitch (T1) recovery of 1%, 10%, or 25%. Another eight adults and eight children received 1.5 mg/kg succinylcholine. At each age, spontaneous recovery of T1 and TOF was similar after rocuronium and vecuronium administration but was more rapid in children (P < 0.05). Spontaneous recovery to TOF0.7 after rocuronium and vecuronium administration in adults was 45.7 +/- 11.5 min and 52.5 +/- 15.6 min; in children, it was 28.8 +/- 7.8 min and 34.6 +/- 9.0 min. Neostigmine accelerated recovery in all reversal groups (P < 0.05) by approximately 40%, but the times from relaxant administration to TOF0.7 were similar and independent of the timing of neostigmine administration. Recovery to T1 90% after succinylcholine was similar in adults (9.4 +/- 5.0 min) and children (8.4 +/- 1.1 min) and was shorter than recovery to TOF0.7 in any reversal group after rocuronium or vecuronium administration. Recovery from rocuronium and vecuronium blockade after neostigmine administration was more rapid in children than in adults. Return of neuromuscular function after reversal was not influenced by the timing of neostigmine administration. These results suggest that reversal of intense rocuronium or vecuronium neuromuscular blockade need not be delayed until return of appreciable neuromuscular function has been demonstrated. ⋯ These results suggest that reversal of intense rocuronium or vecuronium neuromuscular blockade need not be delayed until return of appreciable neuromuscular function has been demonstrated. Although spontaneous and neostigmine-assisted recovery is more rapid in children than in adults, in neither is return of function as rapid as after succinylcholine administration.