Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Dec 2000
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialThe use of dexamethasone for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in females undergoing thyroidectomy: a dose-ranging study.
We sought to determine the minimum effective dose of dexamethasone in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in women undergoing thyroidectomy. Two hundred twenty-five women (n = 45 in each of five groups) undergoing thyroidectomy under general anesthesia were enrolled in this randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. Immediately after the induction of anesthesia, patients received IV dexamethasone at doses of 10 mg (D10), 5 mg (D5), 2.5 mg (D2.5), 1.25 mg (D1.25), or saline (S). ⋯ Dexamethasone 2.5 mg reduced the total incidence of nausea and vomiting. Dexamethasone 1.25 mg was not effective. Dexamethasone 5 mg IV is the minimum effective dose in preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in women undergoing thyroidectomy.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Dec 2000
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialThe comparison of hypertonic saline (7.5%) and normal saline (0.9%) for initial fluid administration before spinal anesthesia.
Hypertonic saline can be used for initial fluid administration before spinal anesthesia. It is effective in small-volume fluid resuscitation. This randomized double-blinded study compared the effects of 7.5% hypertonic saline (HS) and 0.9% normal saline (NS) in doses containing 2 mmol/kg of sodium in 40 ASA physical status I-II patients undergoing arthroscopy or other lower limb surgery under spinal anesthesia. ⋯ In all our patients, the plasma sodium concentrations were within the normal range after surgery and serum osmolality was within the normal range after spinal anesthesia. The time and the volume of the first micturition were similar in both groups, despite the much smaller amount of infused free water in the HS group. We conclude that 7.5% HS was as good as NS for the initial fluid administration before spinal anesthesia when the amount of sodium was kept unchanged.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Dec 2000
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialPerioperative myocardial ischemia in cataract surgery patients: general versus local anesthesia.
Patients having cataract surgery are usually elderly and have risk factors for ischemic heart disease. We sought to determine the incidence of perioperative myocardial ischemia in patients having cataract surgery and compare the influence of local anesthesia (LA) and general anesthesia (GA). Eighty-one patients undergoing cataract surgery with at least two risk factors for ischemic heart disease were monitored continuously for 24 h by using electrocardiogram leads II and V5 and a Holter recorder (Medilog 4500, Oxford Ltd, UK). ⋯ All intraoperative ischemic events were associated with tachycardia (> or =20% of baseline), whereas postoperative ischemic changes were mostly independent of heart rate. Only one of the ischemic patients (in the GA group) was admitted as a result of intractable chest pain. There were significantly less intraoperative episodes in the LA group, suggesting that LA may be safer than GA in patients during this type of surgery.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Dec 2000
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialMultimodal antiemetic management prevents early postoperative vomiting after outpatient laparoscopy.
Because no completely effective antiemetic exists for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), we hypothesize that a multimodal approach to management of PONV may reduce both vomiting and the need for rescue antiemetics in high-risk patients. After IRB approval, women undergoing outpatient laparoscopy were randomized to one of three groups. Group I (n = 60) was managed by using a predefined multimodal clinical care algorithm. ⋯ Return to normal daily activity and overall satisfaction were not different among groups. Multimodal management resulted in a 98% complete response rate and a 0% incidence of vomiting before discharge; however, this improvement did not result in an increased level of patient satisfaction when compared with routine monotherapy prophylaxis. We conclude that both multimodal management and routine monotherapy antiemetic prophylaxis resulted in an increased level of patient satisfaction than symptomatic treatment in this high-risk population.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Dec 2000
Comparative Study Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical TrialRespiratory efficacy of subglottic low-frequency, subglottic combined-frequency, and supraglottic combined-frequency jet ventilation during microlaryngeal surgery.
We tested the respiratory efficacy of different jet ventilation techniques (subglottic low-frequency versus subglottic combined-frequency and subglottic combined-frequency versus supraglottic combined frequency) in patients undergoing microlaryngeal surgery. The PaCO(2) and the quotient of arterial oxygen tension (PaO(2)) over FIO(2) were measured. After anesthetic induction (propofol, remifentanil, vecuronium), an endotracheal Mon-Jet catheter (Xomed, Jacksonville, FL) for subglottic jet ventilation and a laryngoscope for supraglottic jet ventilation (Carl Reiner G.m.b.H., Vienna, Austria) were inserted. In Group 1 (n = 18), subglottic low-frequency (15 breaths/min), combined-frequency (600 and 15 breaths/min), and low-frequency jet ventilation was subsequently performed (15 min each). In Group 2 (n = 19), the sequence was supraglottic, subglottic, and supraglottic combined-frequency jet ventilation. The driving pressures were initially adjusted to achieve normocapnia and were not changed during the entire study period. The FIO(2) was measured endotracheally. The Wilcoxon's signed rank test was applied. In Group 1, PaCO(2) and PaO(2)/FIO(2) improved significantly after switching from subglottic low-frequency to subglottic combined-frequency jet ventilation (PaCO(2), from 46.6 +/-8.3 to 42.1+/-8.1 mm Hg; PaO(2)/FIO(2), from 311+/-144 to 361+/-141 mm Hg; P<0.05). In Group 2, PaCO(2) increased and PaO(2)/FIO(2) decreased significantly after switching from supraglottic to subglottic combined-frequency jet ventilation (PaCO(2), from 39.4+/-7.1 to 45.9+/-7.5 mm Hg; PaO(2)/FIO(2), from 415+/-114 to 351+/-129 mm Hg; P<0.05). We conclude that subglottic combined-frequency jet ventilation is less effective than supraglottic combined-frequency ventilation, but more effective than subglottic low-frequency jet ventilation. ⋯ The combination of high and low respiratory frequencies (600 and 15 breaths/min) improves pulmonary gas exchange during subglottic jet ventilation via an endotracheal catheter. However, subglottic combined-frequency jet ventilation is less effective than supraglottic combined-frequency jet ventilation via a jet ventilation laryngoscope.