Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Feb 2000
Factors influencing the reporting of adverse perioperative outcomes to a quality management program.
Quality management programs have used several data reporting sources to identify adverse perioperative outcomes. We compared reporting sources and identified factors that might improve data capture. Adverse perioperative outcomes between January 1, 1992, and December 31, 1994, were reported to the Department of Anesthesiology Quality Management program by anesthesiologists, hospital chart reviewers, and other hospital personnel using incident reports. The reports were compared for preoperative health status, severity of outcome, and associated human error. Subsequently, personnel representing the various sources were surveyed regarding factors that might affect their reporting of adverse outcomes. Of 37,924 anesthetics, 734 (1. 9%) adverse outcomes were reported, 519 (71%) of which were identified by anesthesiologists, 282 (38%) by chart reviewers, and 67 (9.1%) by incident report. There was no statistically significant difference in reporting rates by anesthesiologists according to preexisting disease, severity of outcome, or presence of human error. Thirteen cases involving human error, however, resulted in disabling patient injury, with a higher rate of self-reporting for these cases (92%, P < 0.05). Rates of reporting by chart reviewers varied (P < 0.05) according to severity of patient illness and severity of outcome. Incident reports identified only 67 adverse outcomes (9.1%), but included a significantly higher percentage of the adverse outcomes involving human error (23.3%, P < 0.05). Twenty attending anesthesiologists, 15 resident anesthesiologists, 29 operating room nurses, 19 postanesthesia care unit nurses, and 6 hospital chart reviewers responded to the survey. Only the potential to improve quality of patient care influenced or strongly influenced a decision by all groups to report an adverse outcome to a peer review process. Physician self-reporting is a more reliable method of identifying adverse outcomes than either medical chart review or incident reporting. ⋯ Physician self-reporting is a more reliable method of identifying adverse outcomes than either medical chart review or incident reporting. Reporting by chart reviewers is biased both by the severity of outcome and severity of patient illness, whereas incident reports tend to focus on human error. All groups feel compelled to report adverse outcomes when the data may result in improved patient care.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Feb 2000
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialForced-air warming decreases vasodilator requirement after coronary artery bypass surgery.
Postoperative hypothermia is common and associated with adverse hemodynamic consequences, including adrenergically mediated systemic vasoconstriction and hypertension. Hypothermia is also a known predictor of dysrhythmias and myocardial ischemia in high-risk patients. We describe a prospective, randomized trial designed to test the hypothesis that forced-air warming (FAW) provides improved hemodynamic variables after coronary artery bypass graft. ⋯ In conclusion, aggressive cutaneous warming with FAW results in a higher mean skin temperature and a decreased requirement for vasodilator therapy in hypothermic patients after cardiac surgery. This most likely reflects attenuation of the adrenergic response or opening of cutaneous vascular beds as a result of surface warming. IMPLICATIONS Forced-air warming after cardiac surgery decreases the requirement for vasodilator drugs and may be beneficial in maintaining hemodynamic variables within predefined limits.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Feb 2000
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe pharmacokinetics and analgesic efficacy of larger dose rectal acetaminophen (40 mg/kg) in adults: a double-blinded, randomized study.
Analgesic acetaminophen plasma concentrations are not known. We investigated in a randomized, double-blinded study the pharmacokinetics and analgesic efficacy of small- (AS; 20 mg. kg(-1)) and larger- (AL; 40 mg/kg) dose rectal acetaminophen and compared it with the combination (C) of rectal diclofenac (100 mg) and acetaminophen (20 mg/kg) in 65 women undergoing hysterectomy. Suppositories were administered after the induction of a standardized general anesthesia. Pain (measured by using a 10-cm visual analog scale) and morphine consumption (patient-controlled analgesia) were repeatedly assessed for 24 h. Acetaminophen plasma concentrations were measured by using a fluorescence polarization immunoassay. Antipyretic plasma concentrations (10-20 mg/L) after 40 mg/kg acetaminophen were not associated with improved analgesia or decreased opioid requirements; 20 mg/kg acetaminophen produced subtherapeutic plasma levels (<10 mg/L). Maximal plasma concentrations of 17.2 and 10.4 mg/L (P < 0.01, analysis of variance) were achieved after 4.2 and 3.6 h for the AL and AS groups, respectively. The only difference in clinical outcome was lower visual analog scale scores after acetaminophen/diclofenac (C 2.0 versus AS 3.2 and AL 3.4) 4 h after the induction (P < 0.05, analysis of variance). Acetaminophen pharmacokinetics in adults were similar to those observed in children. Analgesic plasma concentrations are likely to be higher than antipyretic plasma levels, which were only attained after twice the recommended rectal dose was administered. Analgesic plasma concentrations have yet to be determined but may be higher than those associated with antipyresis. ⋯ Acetaminophen pharmacokinetics were comparable in adults and children. Plasma concentrations known to reduce fever did not produce better pain relief and were only achieved after twice the conventional dose was administered. Analgesic plasma concentrations have yet to be determined but may be higher than those associated with antipyresis.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Feb 2000
Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical TrialPulmonary artery thromboendarterectomy: a comparison of two different postoperative treatment strategies.
Pulmonary artery thromboendarterectomy (PTE) is a potentially curative surgical procedure for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. It is, nevertheless, associated with considerable mortality caused by postoperative complications, such as reperfusion pulmonary edema (RPE) (i.e., pulmonary infiltrates in regions distal to vessels subjected to endarterectomy) and right heart failure (RHF). However, there are no reports about the influence of different postoperative treatment strategies on complications and mortality. Therefore, we compared two different treatment strategies. In Group I (n = 33), positive inotropic catecholamines and vasodilators were avoided during termination of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) and thereafter, and mechanical ventilation was performed with low tidal volumes < 8 mL/kg, duration of inspiration:duration of expiration = 3:1, and peak inspiratory pressures < 18 cm H(2)O. In Group II (n = 14), positive inotropic catecholamines and vasodilators were regularly used for termination of CPB and thereafter, and ventilation was performed with high tidal volumes (10-15 mL/kg) and peak inspiratory pressures up to 50 cm H(2)O. Hemodynamics, the incidence of RPE and RHF, duration of ventilation, morbidity, and mortality were recorded. Cardiac index was comparable before surgery (2.11 +/- 0.09 vs 2.08 +/- 0.09 L. min(-1). m(-2)) and 20 min after CPB (2.26 +/- 0.09 vs 2.60 +/- 0.20 L. min(-1). m(-2)). RPE occurred in 6.1% (Group I) versus 14.3% (Group II), and RHF was observed in 9.1% (Group I) versus 21.4% (Group II). Mortality was 9.1% (Group I) versus 21.4% (Group II). Thus, the avoidance of positive inotropic catecholamines and vasodilators in combination with nonaggressive mechanical ventilation after PTE was associated with a low incidence of RPE, RHF, duration of ventilation, and mortality after PTE. ⋯ The avoidance of positive inotropic catecholamines and vasodilators in combination with nonaggressive mechanical ventilation was associated with a low incidence of reperfusion pulmonary edema and/or right heart failure after pulmonary artery thromboendarterectomy.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Feb 2000
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialPatient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor: the effects of the increase in bolus and lockout interval.
Most studies use a bolus size of <6 mL of 0.125% bu- pivacaine for patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) during labor. In this double-blinded, randomized study, we compared the efficacy of a larger bolus injected via a PCEA pump to a conventional PCEA setting. By using a combination of 0.125% bupivacaine with 1:800,000 epinephrine and 0.625 microg/mL sufentanil, the first PCEA setting was typical (4 mL/8 min), whereas the other combined a 12-mL bolus dose and a 25-min lockout interval, i.e., similar maximal hourly dose. Rescue analgesia was provided with 6 mL of 0.25% bupivacaine. Patient satisfaction and pain were scored on verbal and visual analog scales. Data were analyzed from 103 parturients in the 12-mL/25-min group and 100 in the 4-mL/8-min group. In the 12-mL/25-min group, the median pain score on a 0- to 10-cm visual analog scale was lower at 6-cm cervical dilation (1 [range = 0-8] vs 3 [0-8]) and at delivery (1 [0-10] vs 2 [0-10]). Satisfaction was also better (70% vs 38% "excellent" opinions, at 6-cm cervical dilation). Use of the pump (ratio of successful and total demands) was high and similar in both groups. Rescue analgesia was comparable. Doses of analgesics were greater in the 12-mL/25-min group (hourly bupivacaine dose = 13.9 +/- 5.3 [mean+/- SD] vs 9.4 +/- 4.1 mg). No differences were noted between groups for the severity of hypotension, ephedrine requirement, outcome of the delivery, and Apgar scores. ⋯ A patient-controlled epidural analgesia setting that allows a parturient to receive an increased analgesic dose improves satisfaction with patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor.