Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jun 2000
Clinical TrialThe effects of tramadol and morphine on immune responses and pain after surgery in cancer patients.
There has been growing interest in determining the possible immune consequences of opioid administration for the management of postoperative pain. We studied the effects of morphine and tramadol on pain and immune function during the postoperative period in 30 patients undergoing abdominal surgery for uterine carcinoma. Phytohemoagglutinin-induced T lymphocyte proliferation and natural killer cell activity were evaluated immediately before and after surgery, and 2 h after the acute administration of either 10 mg of morphine IM or 100 mg tramadol IM for pain. In all patients, phytohemagglutinin-induced lymphoproliferation was significantly depressed by surgical stress. However, in the morphine-treated group, proliferative values remained lower than basal levels for 2 h after treatment, whereas in tramadol-administered patients proliferative values returned to basal levels. Natural killer cell activity was not significantly affected by surgery nor by morphine administration, whereas tramadol significantly enhanced the activity of natural killer cells. Both drugs produced a comparable reduction in postoperative pain. We conclude that, as previously observed in the experimental animal, tramadol and morphine, when administered in analgesic doses, induce different immune effects. ⋯ Recent studies suggest that opioids can have an adverse impact on the immune system. Because surgical stress also induces immune dysfunction, the search for analgesic drugs devoid of immunosuppressive effects is of import. This study compared the effects on immune responses of morphine and of the atypical opioid analgesic, tramadol, given for postoperative pain to gynecological cancer patients. Tramadol and morphine showed comparable analgesic activity; however, tramadol, in contrast to morphine, induced an improvement of postoperative immunosuppression and, therefore, may be preferred to morphine for the treatment of postoperative pain.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jun 2000
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialA dose-response study of prophylactic intravenous ephedrine for the prevention of hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery.
We performed a randomized, double-blinded dose-finding study of IV ephedrine for prophylaxis for hypotension in 80 women who received an IV crystalloid preload and spinal anesthesia for elective cesarean delivery. One minute after the intrathecal injection, patients were given saline control or ephedrine 10, 20, or 30 mg IV for 30 s. Systolic arterial pressure (SAP) in the first 12 min after the spinal injection was greater in the 30-mg group compared with other groups (P < 0.05). Hypotension occurred in 7 patients (35%) in the 30-mg group compared with 19 (95%), 17 (85%), and 16 (80%) patients in the control and 10- and 20-mg groups, respectively (P < 0.0001). Maximum decrease in SAP was smaller in the 30-mg group (mean lowest SAP 87% of baseline, range 58%-105%) compared with other groups (P < 0.01). Reactive hypertension occurred in 9 patients (45%) in the 30-mg group (mean highest SAP 120% of baseline, range 104%-143%) compared with 2 (10%), 1 (5%), and 5 (25%) patients in the other groups (P = 0.009). Heart rate changes, total ephedrine requirement, incidence of nausea and vomiting, and neonatal outcome were similar among groups. The proportion of patients with umbilical arterial pH < 7.2 was 10.5%, 25%, 42%, and 22% in the control, 10-, 20-, and 30-mg groups, respectively (P = 0. 12). We conclude that the smallest effective dose of ephedrine to reduce the incidence of hypotension was 30 mg. However, this dose did not completely eliminate hypotension, nausea and vomiting, and fetal acidosis, and it caused reactive hypertension in some patients. ⋯ We investigated different doses of IV ephedrine as prophylaxis for hypotension during spinal anesthesia for cesarean delivery and found that the smallest effective dose was 30 mg. However, this dose did not completely eliminate hypotension, caused reactive hypertension in some patients, and did not improve neonatal outcome.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jun 2000
Toast and tea before elective surgery? A national survey on current practice.
A more tolerant approach to preoperative fasting guidelines for healthy adults undergoing elective surgery was recently recommended by a task force appointed by the American Society of Anesthesiologists. This recommendation liberalizes the intake of clear liquids and specifically allows a light breakfast (e.g., toast and tea or coffee) up to 6 h before elective surgery. We conducted a national survey to determine whether anesthesiologists giving anesthesia in an outpatient setting in the United States were currently following these recommendations, and whether institutional policy reflects these new guidelines. The population consisted of the entire active membership of the Society for Ambulatory Anesthesia, providing an initial sample size of 623 subjects. Most conservatively calculated, we had a response rate of 59.6%. A total of 62% of the respondents said they have an institutional policy in place to allow clear liquids orally 2-3 h before the induction of anesthesia. However, only 35% of the respondents said their institutions had a policy in place allowing a light breakfast 6 h before elective surgery. Nevertheless, only 3% of the responders said they would cancel the operation if a patient actually arrived at the facility after consuming a light breakfast, such as toast and tea 6 h before elective surgery, 32% would delay surgery to later that day, and 65% would proceed without delay. We concluded that most anesthesiologists practicing outpatient anesthesia in the United States have already changed their practice pattern to conform to the recent recommendations of the American Society of Anesthesiologists task force on preoperative fasting time. ⋯ Findings of this national survey conducted among active members of the Society for Ambulatory Anesthesia may encourage anesthesiologists throughout the world to take a more liberal attitude toward allowing clear liquids 2-3 h and a light breakfast 6 h before an elective surgery in healthy patients.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Jun 2000
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialOndansetron given before induction of anesthesia reduces shivering after general anesthesia.
The neurotransmitter pathways involved in the mechanism of postanesthetic shivering (PAS) are poorly understood. Meperidine, clonidine, and physostigmine are all effective treatments, indicating that opioid, alpha(2)-adrenergic, and anticholinergic systems are probably involved. We investigated the effect of ondansetron, a 5-HT(3) antagonist used to treat postoperative nausea and vomiting, on intraoperative core and peripheral temperatures and PAS. Eighty-two patients (age, 18-60 yr) undergoing orthopedic, general, or urological surgery were randomized into three groups in this double-blinded, placebo-controlled, study: Group O4 (n = 27) received ondansetron 4 mg IV, Group O8 (n = 27) received ondansetron 8 mg IV, and Group C (n = 28) received saline IV immediately before the anesthetic induction. Core (tympanic) and fingertip temperature (dorsum of middle finger) were recorded. Anesthesia was induced with IV fentanyl 1 microg/kg and propofol 2.0-2.5 mg/kg and maintained with 1 minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration isoflurane in 70% nitrous oxide/oxygen. The occurrence of shivering was documented clinically during recovery by nursing staff, who were unaware of the group assignment. PAS occurred in 16 of 28 (57%) patients in Group C, compared with 9 of 27 (33%) in Group O4 (P = 0.13) and 4 of 27 (15%) patients in Group O8 (P = 0.003). Within each group, core temperature decreased and peripheral temperature increased significantly, but there were no significant differences among the groups at any time interval. We conclude that ondansetron 8 mg IV given during the induction of anesthesia prevents PAS without affecting the core-to-peripheral redistribution of heat during general anesthesia. This suggests that serotonergic pathways have a role in the regulation of PAS. ⋯ In a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, clinical study, ondansetron 8 mg IV, given just before the induction, reduced the incidence of postanesthetic shivering compared with saline. The anticipated core-to-peripheral redistribution of body temperature during general anesthesia was not affected. This implies that ondansetron probably acts by a central inhibitory mechanism, and that 5-hydroxytryptaminergic pathways have a role in regulating postanesthetic shivering.