Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 2001
Surgical stress induces endotoxin hyporesponsiveness and an early decrease of monocyte mCD14 and HLA-DR expression during surgery.
It is generally accepted that major surgery is associated with severe alterations of the host-defense mechanisms. We investigated the effect of surgical stress on the immune system. Specifically, we studied the relationship between perioperative lipopolysaccharide (LPS) hyporesponsiveness and monocyte human leukocyte antigen-DR (HLA-DR) and CD14 expression during the perioperative period in 20 patients who underwent partial gastrectomy. This study demonstrated that surgical stress rapidly depressed monocyte mCD14 and HLA-DR expression in comparison with preanesthesia levels. Monocyte mCD14 expression recovered to preoperative levels on the first postoperative day, and monocyte HLA-DR expression recovered by the seventh postoperative day. Consistent with our previous study, LPS-induced tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-alpha production ex vivo was significantly suppressed from the beginning of the operation. On the contrary, the plasma interleukin-10 concentration started to increase after the surgical incision was made. LPS hyporesponsiveness was least at the end of the operation and returned to preoperative levels on the first postoperative day. In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that LPS responsiveness, plasma interleukin-10 concentration, and monocytes mCD14 and HLA-DR expression altered from the early period of surgery. These alterations may be related to the impairment of the immune system during the perioperative period. ⋯ Recent studies demonstrate that surgical stress induces immune dysfunction. We found that surgical stress rapidly decreased monocyte mCD14 and human leukocyte antigen-DR expression, and endotoxin responsiveness. These findings suggest that early changes of the immune system caused by surgical stress contribute to postoperative complications such as sepsis and multiple organ failure.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 2001
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialThe intubating laryngeal mask airway after induction of general anesthesia versus awake fiberoptic intubation in patients with difficult airways.
We performed the current study to compare tracheal intubation (TI) using awake fiberoptic intubation (AFOI) and TI using the intubating laryngeal mask airway (ILMA) in patients with difficult airway. Our hypothesis was that patients with difficult airways could be safely intubated after induction of anesthesia using the ILMA. After ethics approval and informed consent, 38 patients who were identified to have difficult airways were randomly assigned to AFOI or TI using the ILMA. Patients in the AFOI group had the usual sedation and airway topicalization. Patients in the ILMA group were induced with propofol for ILMA insertion and succinylcholine for TI. The first TI attempt was done blindly via the ILMA and all subsequent attempts were performed with fiberoptic guidance. All patients in the ILMA group were successfully ventilated. Successful TI was achieved in all patients in both groups. However, in 10% of the patients in the ILMA group, TI was achieved by a second anesthesiologist who was more experienced with the use of the ILMA. In a postoperative questionnaire, patients in the ILMA group were more satisfied with their method of TI (P < 0.01). The ILMA is a useful device in the management of patients with difficult airways and may be a valuable alternative to AFOI when AFOI is contraindicated or in the patient with the unanticipated difficult airway. ⋯ The intubating laryngeal mask airway is a useful device in the management of patients with difficult airways and may be a valuable alternative to awake fiberoptic intubation (AFOI) when AFOI is contraindicated or in the patient with the unanticipated difficult airway.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 2001
Can initial distribution volume of glucose predict hypovolemic hypotension after radical surgery for esophageal cancer?
We recently reported that the initial distribution volume of glucose (IDVG) reliably measures the central extracellular fluid volume in the presence or absence of fluid gain or loss. We examined which variables, including IDVG, can predict subsequent hypovolemic hypotension produced by the continuous shift of the extracellular fluid from the central to the peripheral compartment early after radical surgery for esophageal cancer. IDVG and plasma volume were calculated after measuring cardiac index (CI), central venous pressure, and pulmonary artery wedge pressure immediately after admission to the intensive care unit. Intraoperative fluid balance and urine volume were also recorded. Postoperative hypovolemic hypotension was clinically defined as systolic blood pressure < 80 mm Hg responsive to IV fluid administration. Either IDVG < 105 mL/kg or CI < 3.4 L. min(-1). m(-2) was associated with subsequent hypovolemic hypotension (P = 0.002 for the former and P = 0.00 03 for the latter), while remaining variables were not. IDVG and CI were well correlated (r = 0.8 7, n = 25, P = 0.0001). Our results suggest that IDVG can help predict the subsequent hypovolemic hypotension early after radical surgery for esophageal cancer. ⋯ Routine cardiovascular variables immediately after major surgery cannot predict the subsequent hypovolemic hypotension produced by the shift of the extracellular fluid. Glucose dilution using glucose 5 g and a one-compartment model can predict it simply and rapidly.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 2001
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Clinical TrialThe efficacy and resource utilization of remifentanil and fentanyl in fast-track coronary artery bypass graft surgery: a prospective randomized, double-blinded controlled, multi-center trial.
We compared (a) the perioperative complications; (b) times to eligibility for, and actual time of the following: extubation, less intense monitoring, intensive care unit (ICU), and hospital discharge; and (c) resource utilization of nursing ratio for patients receiving either a typical fentanyl/isoflurane/propofol regimen or a remifentanil/isoflurane/propofol regimen for fast-track cardiac anesthesia in 304 adults by using a prospective randomized, double-blinded, double-dummy trial. There were no differences in demographic data, or perioperative mortality and morbidity between the two study groups. The mini-mental status examination at postoperative Days 1 to 3 were similar between the two groups. The eligible and actual times for extubation, less intense monitoring, ICU discharge, and hospital discharge were not significantly different. Further analyses revealed no differences in times for extubation and resource utilization after stratification by preoperative risk scores, age, and country. The nurse/patient ratio was similar between the remifentanil/isoflurane/propofol and fentanyl/isoflu-rane/propofol groups during the initial ICU phase and less intense monitoring phase. Increasing preoperative risk scores and older age (>70 yr) were associated with longer times until extubation (eligible), ICU discharge (eligible and actual), and hospital discharge (eligible and actual). Times until extubation (eligible and actual) and less intense monitoring (eligible) were significantly shorter in Canadian patients than United States' patients. However, there was no difference in hospital length of stay in Canadian and United States' patients. We conclude that both anesthesia techniques permit early and similar times until tracheal extubation, less intense monitoring, ICU and hospital discharge, and reduced resource utilization after coronary artery bypass graft surgery. ⋯ An ultra-short opioid technique was compared with a standard fast-track small-dose opioid technique in coronary artery bypass graft patients in a prospective randomized, double-blinded controlled study. The postoperative recovery and resource utilization, including stratification of preoperative risk score, age, and country, were analyzed.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · May 2001
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialA comparison of 0.0625% bupivacaine with fentanyl and 0.1% ropivacaine with fentanyl for continuous epidural labor analgesia.
We compared the analgesic efficacy and the degree of motor block achieved with epidural infusion of 0.0625% bupivacaine (Group B) versus 0.1% ropivacaine (Group R), both with 0.0002% fentanyl (2 microg/mL) in laboring patients. A prospective, double-blinded study was performed in 98 ASA physical status I-II parturients who were divided randomly into two groups to receive either bupivacaine or ropivacaine after catheter location had been tested with an initial bolus of lidocaine and fentanyl. The infusion rate was 15 mL/h in every case. When pain was perceived, 5-mL boluses of the assigned epidural analgesic were administered every 10 min until analgesia was achieved. We recorded pain intensity, level of sensory block, degree of motor block, hemodynamic variables, secondary effects, mode of delivery, neonatal outcome, and patient satisfaction. There were no statistically significant differences in any of the factors analyzed. Highly effective analgesia was achieved in both groups with a small incidence of motor block. These findings suggest that bupivacaine may be more potent than ropivacaine. ⋯ We compared different concentrations of epidural bupivacaine and ropivacaine thought to be equipotent. Both solutions were equally efficient in providing highly effective epidural analgesia for labor with minimal motor block. These findings suggest that bupivacaine may be more potent than ropivacaine.