Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesiologists use a myriad of drugs during the provision of an anesthetic. Many of these drugs have side effects that are dose related, and some lead to severe immune-mediated adverse reactions. Anaphylaxis is the most severe immune-mediated reaction; it generally occurs on reexposure to a specific antigen and requires the release of proinflammatory mediators. ⋯ Management of anaphylaxis includes discontinuation of the presumptive drug (or latex) and anesthetic, aggressive pulmonary and cardiovascular support, and epinephrine. Although a serum tryptase confirms the diagnosis of an anaphylactic reaction, the offending drug can be identified by skin-prick, intradermal testing, or serologic testing. Prevention of recurrences is critical to avoid mortality and morbidity.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 2003
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialSpinal mechanisms contribute to analgesia produced by epidural sufentanil combined with bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia.
When used alone, lipid-soluble epidural opioids are thought to produce analgesia supraspinally via systemic absorption. However, spinal opioids and local anesthetics have been shown to act synergistically at the spinal level in animal studies. We, therefore, tested the hypothesis that sufentanil requirements will be less when given epidurally than IV in patients simultaneously given epidural bupivacaine after major abdominal surgery. Forty patients were anesthetized with isoflurane and epidural bupivacaine for major abdominal surgery. After surgery, each was given a continuous epidural infusion of bupivacaine at a rate of 5 mg/h and sufentanil patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). In a randomized, double-blinded fashion, the sufentanil was given either epidurally or IV. PCA settings were the same in each group. For 60 hrs after surgery, the following variables were measured: pain scores at rest, during mobilization, and during coughing; extension of sensory block; side effects; and sufentanil consumption. Pain scores, extension of sensory block, and the incidence of side effects did not differ between the two groups. Consumption of sufentanil in the epidural group was half that of the IV group (48 h after surgery: 107 +/- 57 microg versus 207 +/- 100 microg for the epidural and IV groups, respectively; P < 0.05). We conclude that spinal mechanisms contribute to the analgesia produced by epidural sufentanil in combination with a local anesthetic. ⋯ When combined with epidural bupivacaine, the sufentanil requirement was 50% less when given epidurally than IV. Epidural sufentanil thus appears to have a spinal mechanism of action.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 2003
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialA silicone-based wire-reinforced tracheal tube with a hemispherical bevel reduces nasal morbidity for nasotracheal intubation.
We tested the hypothesis that a silicone-based wire-reinforced tracheal tube with a hemispherical bevel is superior to a polyvinyl chloride (PVC)-based precurved tube with a conventional diagonal bevel for nasotracheal intubation. Eighty anesthetized paralyzed adults (ASA physical status I-II) requiring nasotracheal intubation for tonsillectomy were randomly allocated into two equal-sized groups for airway management with the silicone tracheal tube or PVC tracheal tube. Intubation was subdivided into three phases: 1). passage through the nose into the pharynx, 2). laryngoscope-guided passage into the glottic inlet, and 3). laryngoscope-guided passage into the trachea. A specific sequence of airway maneuvers was followed at each stage if it was unsuccessful. The number of attempts and intubation time were documented by an unblinded observer. The frequency of epistaxis and postoperative nasal complications was documented by blinded observers. There were no intubation failures. The number of attempts at pharyngeal (47 versus 56; P = 0.04) and tracheal (43 versus 55; P = 0.005) placement was smaller for the silicone tracheal tube, but the number of attempts at glottic placement was more (72 versus 49; P < 0.0001). Intubation time was similar. The frequency (32% versus 80%; P < 0.0001) and severity of epistaxis were less for the silicone tracheal tube. The total number of postoperative nasal symptoms was smaller for the silicone tracheal tube (10 versus 21; P < 0.05). We conclude that the pharyngeal and tracheal placement phases of nasotracheal intubation require fewer attempts with the silicone tracheal tube than the PVC tracheal tube but that the glottic placement phase requires more attempts. Nasal morbidity is less common with the silicone tracheal tube. ⋯ The pharyngeal and tracheal placement phases of nasotracheal intubation require fewer attempts with a silicone-based wire-reinforced tracheal tube with a hemispherical bevel than with a polyvinyl chloride-based precurved tracheal tube with a conventional diagonal bevel, but the glottic placement phase requires more attempts. Nasal morbidity is less common with the silicone tracheal tube.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 2003
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialThe effect of intravenous pantoprazole and ranitidine for improving preoperative gastric fluid properties in adults undergoing elective surgery.
We studied pantoprazole, a new potent and fast-acting proton pump inhibitor. Its effects on preoperative gastric fluid volume and pH have not yet been determined. In this randomized, controlled trial, we examined the effects of preoperative IV pantoprazole or ranitidine on gastric pH and volume. Ninety patients (ASA status I and II, scheduled for elective surgery) were studied. One hour before surgery, patients in Group I (n = 30) were given IV saline 5 mL, those in Group II (n = 30) were given 40 mg of pantoprazole IV, and those in Group III (n = 30) were given 50 mg of ranitidine IV. A nasogastric tube was inserted immediately after anesthesia induction. Gastric contents were aspirated, and volume and pH were recorded. The pH values determined in Group I were 3.73 +/- 0.82; in Group II, they were 5.30 +/- 1.84; and in Group III, they were 4.80 +/- 1.40. There was no statistical difference between Groups 2 and 3, but there was a significant difference between Group I and Groups 2 and 3 (P < 0.0005). The volume of the gastric contents was 28.67 +/- 10.98 mL in Group I, 15.20 +/- 15.52 mL in Group II, and 7.77 +/- 11.17 mL in Group III. There was no statistical difference between Groups 2 and 3, but there was a statistically significant difference between Group I and Groups 2 and 3 (P < 0.0005). The proportion of patients considered "at risk" of significant lung injury should aspiration occur was 20% of Group I, 10% of Group II, and 3.3% of Group III. When statistically evaluated, there was no difference among groups. We concluded that the administration of IV pantoprazole and ranitidine 1 h before surgery is effective in reducing gastric pH and volume. ⋯ This randomized, controlled trial examined the effects of preoperative IV pantoprazole or ranitidine on gastric pH and volume. We concluded that IV pantoprazole and ranitidine, given 1 h before surgery, are effective in reducing gastric pH and volume.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 2003
The cardioprotective effect of sevoflurane depends on protein kinase C activation, opening of mitochondrial K(+)(ATP) channels, and the production of reactive oxygen species.
Several studies suggest that the cardioprotective effect of sevoflurane depends on protein kinase C (PKC) activation, mitochondrial K(+)(ATP) channel (mitoK(+)(ATP)) opening, and reactive oxygen species (ROS). However, evidence for their involvement was obtained in separate experimental models. Here, we studied the relative roles of PKC, mitoK(+)(ATP), and ROS in sevoflurane-induced cardioprotection in one model. Rat trabeculae were subjected to simulated ischemia by applying metabolic inhibition (MI) through buffer containing NaCN, followed by 60-min reperfusion. Recovery of active force (F(a)) was assessed as percentage of pre-MI force. In time controls, F(a) amounted 60% +/- 5% at the end of the experiment. The recovery of F(a) after MI was reduced to 28% +/- 5% (P = 0.045 versus time control), whereas sevoflurane reversed the detrimental effect of MI (F(a) recovery, 67% +/- 8%; P = 0.01 versus MI). The PKC inhibitor chelerythrine, the mitoK(+)(ATP) inhibitor 5-hydroxy decanoic, and the ROS scavenger N-(2-mercaptopropionyl)-glycine all completely abolished the protective effect of sevoflurane (recovery of F(a), 31% +/- 8%, 33% +/- 8%, and 24% +/- 9% for chelerythrine, 5-hydroxy decanoic, and N-(2-mercaptopropionyl)-glycine, respectively). In conclusion, PKC activation, mitoK(+)(ATP) channel opening, and ROS production are all essential for sevoflurane-induced cardioprotection. These signaling events are arranged in series within a common signaling pathway, rather than in parallel cascades. Our findings implicate that the perioperative use of sevoflurane preserves cardiac function by preventing ischemia-reperfusion injury. ⋯ Protein kinase C, mitochondrial K(+)(ATP) channels and reactive oxygen species act within one downstream signaling pathway in mediating the cardioprotective effect of sevoflurane.