Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 2003
Suppression of natural killer cell activity and promotion of tumor metastasis by ketamine, thiopental, and halothane, but not by propofol: mediating mechanisms and prophylactic measures.
Postoperative immunosuppression is partly ascribed to anesthesia and has been suggested to compromise patients' resistance to infection and tumor metastasis. We compared the effects of various anesthetics on natural killer (NK) cell activity and on resistance to experimental metastasis, and studied mediating mechanisms and prophylactic measures. Fischer 344 rats served as controls or were anesthetized for 1 h with ketamine, thiopental, halothane, or propofol. Anesthetized rats were either maintained in normothermia or left to spontaneously reach 33 degrees C-35 degrees C. Rats were then injected IV with MADB106 tumor cells, and 24 h later lung tumor retention was assessed, or 3 wk later, lung metastases were counted. Additionally, the number and activity of circulating NK cells were assessed after anesthesia. All anesthetics, except propofol, significantly reduced NK activity and increased MADB106 lung tumor retention or lung metastases. Hypothermia had no significant effects. Ketamine increased metastasis most potently, and this effect was markedly reduced in rats pretreated with a beta-adrenergic antagonist (nadolol) or with chronic small doses of an immunostimulator (polyriboinosinic:polyribocytidylic acid). Overall, the marked variation in the NK-suppressive effects of anesthetics seems to underlie their differential promotion of MADB106 metastasis. Prophylactic measures may include perioperative immunostimulation and the use of beta-blockers. ⋯ This study in a rat model of pulmonary metastasis demonstrates that some anesthetics, but not others, increase susceptibility to tumor metastasis, apparently by suppressing natural killer cell activity. Ketamine was most deleterious, and its effects were prevented by peripheral blockade of beta-adrenoceptors combined with low levels of immunostimulation.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 2003
An animal model for surgical anesthesia and analgesia: characterization with isoflurane anesthesia and remifentanil analgesia.
With a traditional clamp test alone, quantitative evaluation of the level of surgical anesthesia/analgesia is not easy. We have developed a rabbit model that allows for repeated quantification of the varying level of surgical anesthesia/analgesia using both mechanical and electrical stimulation as simulated surgical stimuli. After tracheostomy and intravascular cannulations under isoflurane anesthesia, eight rabbits were placed on a sling that allowed for free movement of the head and extremities. The inspired isoflurane concentration was reduced from 3% to 1.5% and then to 0%. Remifentanil was then infused at 4 graded infusion rates (0.1-0.8 microg. kg(-1) x min(-1)). At each drug dose, analgesic variables were determined including the number of animals behaviorally unresponsive to clamping the forepaw (nonresponders) and threshold voltage of subcutaneous electrical stimulation (2 Hz, 5 Hz, and 50 Hz) required to evoke the head lift (HLT, pain detection/arousal threshold) and escape movement responses (EMT, pain tolerance threshold). With increasing drug doses, HLTs and EMTs at 5 Hz increased dose-dependently and most proportionately to increases in the number of nonresponders, a standard indicator of the anesthetic/analgesic level. Therefore, using the HLT and EMT at 5 Hz combined with a clamp test, this rabbit model allows for quantitative evaluation of the varying level of surgical anesthesia/analgesia. ⋯ We have developed a rabbit model of surgical anesthesia and analgesia using both mechanical and electrical stimulation as simulated surgical stimuli, which allows for repeated, quantitative, and qualitative evaluation of the varying level of surgical anesthesia and analgesia, differentiation between sedative/hypnotic and analgesic components of drug actions, and simultaneous monitoring of all the clinically relevant physiological variables including cardiovascular and respiratory variables.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 2003
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialSpinal mechanisms contribute to analgesia produced by epidural sufentanil combined with bupivacaine for postoperative analgesia.
When used alone, lipid-soluble epidural opioids are thought to produce analgesia supraspinally via systemic absorption. However, spinal opioids and local anesthetics have been shown to act synergistically at the spinal level in animal studies. We, therefore, tested the hypothesis that sufentanil requirements will be less when given epidurally than IV in patients simultaneously given epidural bupivacaine after major abdominal surgery. Forty patients were anesthetized with isoflurane and epidural bupivacaine for major abdominal surgery. After surgery, each was given a continuous epidural infusion of bupivacaine at a rate of 5 mg/h and sufentanil patient-controlled analgesia (PCA). In a randomized, double-blinded fashion, the sufentanil was given either epidurally or IV. PCA settings were the same in each group. For 60 hrs after surgery, the following variables were measured: pain scores at rest, during mobilization, and during coughing; extension of sensory block; side effects; and sufentanil consumption. Pain scores, extension of sensory block, and the incidence of side effects did not differ between the two groups. Consumption of sufentanil in the epidural group was half that of the IV group (48 h after surgery: 107 +/- 57 microg versus 207 +/- 100 microg for the epidural and IV groups, respectively; P < 0.05). We conclude that spinal mechanisms contribute to the analgesia produced by epidural sufentanil in combination with a local anesthetic. ⋯ When combined with epidural bupivacaine, the sufentanil requirement was 50% less when given epidurally than IV. Epidural sufentanil thus appears to have a spinal mechanism of action.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 2003
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe use of a continuous popliteal sciatic nerve block after surgery involving the foot and ankle: does it improve the quality of recovery?
Popliteal sciatic nerve block is a commonly used technique for surgery involving the foot and ankle. However, pain can be difficult to control as the local anesthetic block wears off. Therefore, we hypothesized that extending the block by using a continuous infusion of bupivacaine (0.25%) would provide improved pain management and might facilitate the recovery process after foot or ankle surgery. In this randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study, 24 consenting patients undergoing foot or ankle surgery with a standardized general anesthetic technique were studied. Before surgery, a popliteal sciatic nerve block was performed in all patients with an 18-gauge Tuohy epidural needle and a peripheral nerve stimulator. After injection of bupivacaine 0.25% 30 mL and placement of a 20-gauge catheter, patients were randomly assigned to receive either 0.9% saline (control) or bupivacaine 0.25% at a constant rate of 5 mL/h for up to 48 h after surgery. An 11-point verbal rating scale (0 = no pain to 10 = worst pain imaginable) was used to assess the severity of pain. Opioid analgesic use was recorded at specific time intervals after surgery. Follow-up evaluations were performed at 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, and 1 week after surgery to assess pain scores, as well as patient satisfaction with their pain management and quality of recovery, by using a 100-point verbal rating scale (1 = highly dissatisfied to 100 = highly satisfied). In the bupivacaine group, there was a statistically significant reduction in the maximal pain scores (>50%) and in opioid use (>60%) during the postoperative period compared with the control group. Patient satisfaction with postoperative pain management (95 +/- 3 versus 77 +/- 13) and quality of recovery (96 +/- 7 versus 83 +/- 14) was significantly improved in the bupivacaine group (versus control). In addition, 40% of the patients in the bupivacaine group (versus none in the control group) were able to be discharged home on the day of surgery (P = 0.087). In conclusion, a continuous infusion of bupivacaine 0.25% decreased postoperative pain and the need for opioid analgesic rescue medication after orthopedic surgery involving the foot and ankle, leading to improved patient satisfaction and quality of recovery. ⋯ A continuous infusion of bupivacaine 0.25% (versus saline) at the popliteal fossa by using a simple elastomeric pump is an effective method of decreasing postoperative pain, reducing the opioid analgesic requirement, and increasing patient satisfaction with pain management after orthopedic surgery involving the foot and ankle. More importantly, the use of the continuous sciatic nerve block in the popliteal fossa facilitated an earlier discharge after lower extremity surgery.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Nov 2003
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialControlled hypotension and minimal inflation pressure: a new approach for pneumatic tourniquet application in upper limb surgery.
Minimal inflation pressures are recommended for limb surgery to eliminate complications attributable to high inflation pressures with the pneumatic tourniquets. We applied controlled hypotension and a minimal inflation pressure (CHAMIP) technique to provide a bloodless surgical field. Thirty-six patients scheduled for upper extremity surgery were randomized equally to receive either normotensive anesthesia and conventional inflation pressures or controlled hypotension (systolic arterial blood pressure of 80-100 mm Hg and mean arterial blood pressure >60 mm Hg) and minimum inflation pressures. Anesthesia was induced with propofol IV bolus and remifentanil IV continuous infusion and maintained with propofol and remifentanil IV continuous infusion. To determine the minimal inflation pressure, the digital plethysmograph was applied to the second finger at the side of the operation and the tourniquet was inflated slowly until the arterial pulsations disappeared on the oscilloscope. A bloodless surgical field was obtained in almost all patients, even though systolic arterial blood pressures (100-138 mm Hg versus 80-100 mm Hg) and applied tourniquet inflation pressures (270 mm Hg versus 110-140 mm Hg) were significantly lower in the hypotensive group. No complications associated with controlled hypotension were encountered. In conclusion, CHAMIP may be a safe and reliable method for upper extremity surgery performed with pneumatic tourniquets. ⋯ Pneumatic tourniquets are associated with adverse effects resulting from high inflation pressures. Therefore, minimal inflation pressures are recommended in extremity surgery. To reach real minimal inflation pressure the patient's blood pressure must be reduced. We used controlled hypotension with remifentanil and propofol to reach minimal inflation pressures.