Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Mar 2003
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialThe effect of spinal bupivacaine in combination with either epidural clonidine and/or 0.5% bupivacaine administered at the incision site on postoperative outcome in patients undergoing lumbar laminectomy.
Spinal anesthesia has numerous advantages over general anesthesia for patients undergoing lumbar laminectomy and microdisk surgery. In this study, we evaluated the addition of epidural clonidine and/or bupivacaine, injected at the incision site, on postoperative outcome variables in patients undergoing lower spine procedures using spinal anesthesia. One hundred twenty patients having lumbar spine surgery received bupivacaine spinal anesthesia supplemented by 150 microg of epidural clonidine with or without incisional bupivacaine, epidural placebo plus incisional bupivacaine, or placebo with incisional saline. Demographic data, intraoperative hemodynamics, blood loss, pain, nausea, urinary retention, hospital discharge, and other variables were compared by using either analysis of variance or chi(2) analysis. Demographics were similar. IV fluids, blood loss, incidence of intraoperative bradycardia, and hypotension were not different among groups. Postanesthesia care unit pain scores were lower and demand for analgesics was less in patients who received both the clonidine and subcutaneous bupivacaine. Patients who received epidural clonidine also had improved postoperative hemodynamics. Hospital discharge, urinary retention, and other variables were not different. We conclude that epidural clonidine as a supplement to spinal anesthesia produced no perioperative complications and improved postoperative pain and hemodynamic stability in patients undergoing lower spine procedures. ⋯ Spinal anesthesia with supplemental epidural clonidine in combination with incision site subcutaneous bupivacaine was evaluated both intra- and postoperatively and compared with spinal anesthesia alone for lower lumbar spine procedures. Both epidural clonidine and subcutaneous incisional bupivacaine, added to spinal anesthesia for lumbar spine surgery, improves pain relief and reduces the need for postoperative opioids with their associated side effects.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Mar 2003
Modulation of myofilament Ca2+ densitivity by delta- and kappa-opioid agonists in intact guinea pig hearts.
We investigated whether delta- and kappa-opioid agonists alter myocardial function, intracellular Ca(2+) concentration ([Ca(2+)](i)), and myofilament Ca(2+) sensitivity in intact guinea pig beating hearts and whether these effects are mediated by an opioid receptor. Intact guinea pig hearts were perfused with modified Krebs Ringer solution containing delta- (TAN-67) and kappa- (ICI-199441) opioid agonists in the absence and presence of delta- (BNTX) and kappa- (nor-BNI) opioid antagonists, respectively, while functional variables and [Ca(2+)](i) were recorded. TAN-67 (1 microM) and ICI-199441 (1 microM) decreased heart rate (P < 0.05). TAN-67 (1 microM) and ICI-199441 (1 micro M) decreased available [Ca(2+)](i) without changing developed left ventricular pressure (LVP) (P < 0.05). TAN-67 (1 microM) and ICI-199441 (1 microM) also caused a leftward shift in the curve of developed LVP as a function of available [Ca(2+)](i) (P < 0.05). ICI-199441 (1 microM) produced a steeper slope in the relation curve compared with baseline (P < 0.05). BNTX (1 microM) and nor-BNI (1 microM) blocked the effects of TAN-67 and ICI-199441, respectively. delta- and kappa-opioid agonists enhance myofilament Ca(2+) sensitivity despite decreasing available [Ca(2+)](i) in intact isolated guinea pig hearts, and these effects are mediated by delta- and kappa-opioid receptor stimulation. ⋯ Our results indicate that delta- and kappa-opioid agonists enhance myofilament Ca(2+) sensitivity despite decreasing available intracellular Ca(2+) concentrations in intact isolated guinea pig beating hearts, and these effects are mediated by delta- and kappa-opioid receptor stimulation.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Mar 2003
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialA comparison of airway responses during desflurane and sevoflurane administration via a laryngeal mask airway for maintenance of anesthesia.
Although sevoflurane is less pungent than desflurane at larger concentrations, neither anesthetic seems to irritate the airway when administered at the smaller concentrations often used during maintenance of anesthesia. Both anesthetics may be delivered effectively via a laryngeal mask airway, with minimal evidence of airway irritation.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Mar 2003
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialSequential use of midazolam and propofol for long-term sedation in postoperative mechanically ventilated patients.
Acute withdrawal syndromes, including agitation and a long weaning time, are common adverse effects after long-term sedation with midazolam. We performed this study to determine whether the sequential use of midazolam and propofol could reduce adverse effects as compared with midazolam alone. We studied 26 patients receiving mechanical ventilation for three or more days after surgery. Patients were randomly assigned to two groups. In Group M, patients were sedated with midazolam alone. In Group M-P, midazolam was switched to propofol approximately 24 h before the expected stopping of sedation. The level of sedation was maintained at 4 or 5 on the Ramsay sedation scale. The sedation agitation scale was evaluated for 24 h after extubation. The recovery time from stopping of sedation to extubation was significantly shorter in Group M-P (1.3 +/- 0.4 h) compared with Group M (4.0 +/- 2.4 h). The incidence of agitation in Group M-P (8%) was significantly less frequent than that in Group M (54%). The results indicate that sequential use of midazolam and propofol for long-term sedation could reduce the incidence of agitation compared with midazolam alone. ⋯ Our study indicates that sequential use of midazolam and propofol could reduce the incidence of agitation compared with midazolam alone.