Anesthesia and analgesia
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Mar 2003
Clinical TrialInfragluteal-parabiceps sciatic nerve block: an evaluation of a novel approach using a single-injection technique.
Clinical use of the sciatic nerve block (SNB) has been limited by technical difficulties in performing the block using standard approaches, substantial patient discomfort during the procedure, or the need for two injections to block the tibial and peroneal nerves. In this report, we describe a single-injection method for SNB using an infragluteal-parabiceps approach, where the nerve is located along the lateral border of the biceps femoris muscle. SNB was performed in the prone or lateral decubitus position. The needle was positioned (average depth, 56 +/- 15 mm) to the point where plantar flexion (53%) or inversion (45%) of the ipsilateral foot was obtained at < or =0.4 mA. Levobupivacaine 0.625% with epinephrine (1:200:000) was administered at a dose of 0.4 mL/kg. The procedure was completed in 6 +/- 3 min. Discomfort during block placement was treated with fentanyl 50-100 microg in 24% of patients. Complete sensory loss and motor paralysis occurred in 92% of subjects at a median time of 10 (range, 5-25) min after injection. Compared with plantar flexion, foot inversion was associated with a more frequent incidence (86% versus 100%), and shorter latency for both sensory loss and motor paralysis of the peroneal, tibial, and sural nerves. There were no immediate or delayed complications. We conclude that the infragluteal-parabiceps approach to SNB is reliable, efficient, safe, and well tolerated by patients. ⋯ Sciatic nerve block using the infragluteal-parabiceps approach produces sensory loss and motor paralysis after a single 0.4 mL/kg injection of levobupivacaine 0.625% with epinephrine (1:200,000) in >90% of patients. The approach is reliable, uses consistent soft-tissue landmarks, is not typically painful, and does not produce significant complications.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Mar 2003
GABA(A) receptor blockade antagonizes the immobilizing action of propofol but not ketamine or isoflurane in a dose-related manner.
The enhancing action of propofol on gamma-amino-n-butyric acid subtype A (GABA(A)) receptors purportedly underlies its anesthetic effects. However, a recent study found that a GABA(A) antagonist did not alter the capacity of propofol to depress the righting reflex. We examined whether the noncompetitive GABA(A) antagonist picrotoxin and the competitive GABA(A) antagonist gabazine affected a different anesthetic response, immobility in response to a noxious stimulus (a tail clamp in rats), produced by propofol. This effect was compared with that seen with ketamine and isoflurane. Picrotoxin increased the 50% effective dose (ED(50)) for propofol by approximately 379%; gabazine increased it by 362%, and both antagonists acted in a dose-related manner with no apparent ceiling effect (i.e., no limit). Picrotoxin maximally increased the ED(50) for ketamine by approximately 40%-50%, whereas gabazine increased it by 50%-60%. The isoflurane minimum alveolar anesthetic concentration increased by approximately 60% with the picrotoxin and 70% with the gabazine infusion. The ED(50) for propofol was also antagonized by strychnine, a non-GABAergic glycine receptor antagonist and convulsant, to determine whether excitation of the central nervous system by a non-GABAergic mechanism could account for the increases in propofol ED(50) observed. Because strychnine only increased the immobilizing ED(50) of propofol by approximately 50%, GABA(A) receptor antagonism accounted for the results seen with picrotoxin and gabazine. We conclude that GABA(A) antagonism can influence the ED(50) for immobility of propofol and the non-GABAergic anesthetic ketamine, although to a different degree, reflecting physiologic antagonism for ketamine (i.e., an indirect effect via a modulatory effect on the neural circuitry underlying immobility) versus physiologic and pharmacologic antagonism for propofol (i.e., a direct effect by antagonism of propofol's mechanism of action). This study also suggests that the immobilizing action of isoflurane probably does not involve the GABA(A) receptor because antagonism of GABA(A) receptors for animals anesthetized with isoflurane produces results quantitatively and qualitatively similar to ketamine and markedly different from propofol. ⋯ IV picrotoxin and gabazine antagonized the immobilizing action of propofol in a dose-related manner, whereas antagonism of the immobilizing action of ketamine and isoflurane was similar, smaller than for propofol, and not dose-related. These results are consistent with a role for gamma-amino-n-butyric acid subtype A receptors in mediating propofol anesthesia but not ketamine or isoflurane anesthesia.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Mar 2003
Modulation of myofilament Ca2+ densitivity by delta- and kappa-opioid agonists in intact guinea pig hearts.
We investigated whether delta- and kappa-opioid agonists alter myocardial function, intracellular Ca(2+) concentration ([Ca(2+)](i)), and myofilament Ca(2+) sensitivity in intact guinea pig beating hearts and whether these effects are mediated by an opioid receptor. Intact guinea pig hearts were perfused with modified Krebs Ringer solution containing delta- (TAN-67) and kappa- (ICI-199441) opioid agonists in the absence and presence of delta- (BNTX) and kappa- (nor-BNI) opioid antagonists, respectively, while functional variables and [Ca(2+)](i) were recorded. TAN-67 (1 microM) and ICI-199441 (1 microM) decreased heart rate (P < 0.05). TAN-67 (1 microM) and ICI-199441 (1 micro M) decreased available [Ca(2+)](i) without changing developed left ventricular pressure (LVP) (P < 0.05). TAN-67 (1 microM) and ICI-199441 (1 microM) also caused a leftward shift in the curve of developed LVP as a function of available [Ca(2+)](i) (P < 0.05). ICI-199441 (1 microM) produced a steeper slope in the relation curve compared with baseline (P < 0.05). BNTX (1 microM) and nor-BNI (1 microM) blocked the effects of TAN-67 and ICI-199441, respectively. delta- and kappa-opioid agonists enhance myofilament Ca(2+) sensitivity despite decreasing available [Ca(2+)](i) in intact isolated guinea pig hearts, and these effects are mediated by delta- and kappa-opioid receptor stimulation. ⋯ Our results indicate that delta- and kappa-opioid agonists enhance myofilament Ca(2+) sensitivity despite decreasing available intracellular Ca(2+) concentrations in intact isolated guinea pig beating hearts, and these effects are mediated by delta- and kappa-opioid receptor stimulation.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Mar 2003
Inclusion of turnover time does not influence identification of surgical services that over- and underutilize allocated block time.
Allocation of operating room (OR) block time is an ongoing challenge for OR managers. In this study, we sought to determine whether inclusion or exclusion of turnover time in comparisons of block utilization would identify different surgical services as under- or overused. For a 13-mo period, we evaluated data extracted from the OR information system of a large academic medical center. During that time period, 15 surgical services performed 12,245 surgical procedures. Allocated block hours, number of first cases performed, total number of cases, and average case durations were determined. The average turnover time for each service was determined by a manual, case-by-case review of data from 1 mo. Raw utilization (RU; case durations only) and adjusted utilization (AU; case duration plus turnover time) were calculated for each service. Turnover time was credited to the service performing surgery after room turnover. Case du-ration was limited to surgeries performed during resource hours. Two indices of utilization (i.e., the usage rate of the service divided by the overall use of all ORs in the suite) were used to compare services: the RU or AU Index (RUI or AUI). Outliers were services with indices that were >1.15 or <0.85. The RUI identified three services as underutilizers and one service as an overutilizer. Using the AUI, the same outliers were identified, and no new services were identified. Examining the changes in index (between AUI and RUI), the percentage of to-follow cases highly correlated with changes in index (r(2) = 0.60); the average turnover time did not (r(2) = 0.002). Inclusion of turnover time did not change the services that were identified as under- and overutilizer. ⋯ Turnover time is difficult to determine from existing operating room information systems. This study determined the use of block time with and without turnover time for each surgical service in a large academic hospital. Turnover time did not change identification of surgical services that over- (one service) or underused (three services) allocated block time.
-
Anesthesia and analgesia · Mar 2003
Case ReportsAnaphylactoid reaction to hydroxyethylstarch during cesarean delivery in a patient with HELLP syndrome.
This case report describes an allergic reaction attributed to colloid administration before a semi-urgent cesarean delivery. The most challenging part of this event was related to the anesthetic and obstetric treatment options to avoid further compromise of both mother and fetus.